Decolonizing Beauty Markets

Fundamentals

The concept of Decolonizing Beauty Markets beckons us to consider a fundamental shift in how we perceive, produce, and consume beauty products and practices, particularly those related to textured hair. It asks us to look beyond superficial trends and delve into the historical currents that have shaped our understanding of beauty, especially for Black and mixed-race individuals. At its heart, this movement seeks to dismantle the lingering effects of colonial impositions that have long dictated standards of attractiveness, often at the expense of indigenous hair traditions and holistic wellbeing. It is an invitation to reclaim a heritage of hair care that was once vibrant, communal, and deeply connected to ancestral wisdom.

For centuries, the beauty industry, in its dominant Western forms, has often propagated ideals that valorize straight, fine hair, marginalizing and devaluing the rich spectrum of textured hair types. This is not a mere oversight; it is a direct consequence of historical power dynamics rooted in colonialism and its enduring legacy. During the transatlantic slave trade, one of the initial acts of dehumanization involved shaving the heads of enslaved Africans, severing their profound connection to hair as a symbol of identity, status, and spirituality. This deliberate erasure continued with the imposition of Eurocentric beauty standards, which forced many to alter their natural hair to conform to societal expectations, often for survival and perceived social or economic advancement.

The understanding of Decolonizing Beauty Markets begins with recognizing this historical subjugation. It acknowledges that beauty standards are not universal or inherent; instead, they are constructs often designed to uphold existing hierarchies. For textured hair, this meant that coily, kinky, and curly strands were deemed “unruly,” “unprofessional,” or “unbeautiful,” creating a profound psychological burden and an economic market for products designed to “tame” or straighten hair. This dynamic fostered a reliance on chemical treatments and heat styling, frequently at the expense of hair health and ancestral practices that honored natural texture.

Decolonizing Beauty Markets is a profound reclamation of heritage, dismantling imposed beauty standards to celebrate the inherent beauty of textured hair and ancestral wisdom.

The Genesis of a Call ❉ Understanding Decolonization

To truly grasp the meaning of Decolonizing Beauty Markets, one must first appreciate the broader concept of decolonization itself. This is not merely about political independence from colonial rule; it is a far-reaching process of intellectual, cultural, and spiritual liberation. It involves critically examining and dismantling the systems of thought, power, and oppression that continue to shape societies long after formal colonial empires have dissolved. In the realm of beauty, this means questioning the very foundations of what is considered beautiful, who defines it, and whose interests are served by those definitions.

The call to decolonize beauty markets stems from a recognition that the global beauty industry has historically operated as an extension of colonial power. It has dictated aesthetic norms, often through aggressive marketing and the promotion of products that promised assimilation and acceptance. For communities with textured hair, this has meant a continuous struggle against a dominant aesthetic that has historically rendered their natural state as undesirable. The movement seeks to shift this paradigm, moving away from a system that profits from insecurity and towards one that celebrates authentic, diverse beauty.

Understanding this initial framework helps to clarify the multifaceted nature of Decolonizing Beauty Markets. It encompasses a spectrum of actions, from advocating for equitable representation in media to demanding transparency in ingredient sourcing and challenging the very notion of a single, universal beauty ideal. This work is not simply about swapping one product for another; it is about transforming the underlying structures that have historically marginalized particular hair types and the people who wear them.

Hair as a Sacred Map ❉ Textured Hair and Colonial Imposition

For many Indigenous African and diasporic communities, hair has always held a sacred significance, serving as a living map of identity, lineage, and spiritual connection. Pre-colonial African societies utilized intricate hairstyles to convey social status, age, marital standing, tribal affiliation, and even spiritual beliefs. The act of styling hair was often a communal ritual, a moment for intergenerational bonding and the transmission of cultural knowledge. Natural butters, herbs, and powders were integral to these ancestral care practices, ensuring moisture retention and hair health.

The arrival of colonialism violently disrupted these traditions. Enslavement imposed conditions that made traditional hair care impossible, stripping individuals of their tools, time, and access to indigenous ingredients. The subsequent propagation of Eurocentric beauty standards created a deep-seated devaluation of textured hair.

This historical trauma left a lasting mark, fostering internalized biases and a market that catered to altering hair texture rather than nurturing it. The straight hair ideal became intertwined with notions of respectability, professionalism, and social mobility, creating a powerful incentive for conformity.

This colonial imposition was not subtle; it was a deliberate and systemic effort to control and reshape identity. Hair became a visible marker of difference, and conforming to European aesthetics was often presented as a path to acceptance, however conditional. The legacy of these impositions continues to influence perceptions and choices within the beauty industry today, making the task of decolonization a vital undertaking for collective healing and cultural affirmation.

Early Whispers of Reclamation ❉ Resisting the Erasure

Even amidst the most oppressive periods, the spirit of reclamation persisted. Enslaved Africans, despite immense hardship, found ways to preserve fragments of their hair heritage. They braided seeds and grains into their hair, a quiet act of resistance and survival, a literal carrying of their homeland within their strands. This early ingenuity laid the groundwork for future generations who would continue to defy imposed norms.

The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw the rise of Black entrepreneurs who recognized the unmet needs of their communities. Figures like Madam C.J. Walker, a pioneer in the African-American beauty industry, developed specialized products for textured hair, creating economic opportunities and challenging mainstream beauty standards.

Her work, and that of others, provided alternatives to the harsh, often damaging, practices promoted by the dominant market. These efforts, though often operating within the confines of a Eurocentric beauty landscape, represented crucial steps towards self-determination and the valuing of Black hair.

The “Black is Beautiful” movement of the 1960s and 1970s marked a significant cultural renaissance, actively rejecting Eurocentric beauty ideals and promoting the embrace of natural features, including the Afro. This period witnessed a collective shift towards Afrocentric beauty standards, with natural hair becoming a powerful symbol of pride, resistance, and self-acceptance. While not explicitly framed as “decolonizing beauty markets” at the time, these movements laid the ideological groundwork for the current discourse, demonstrating the enduring power of hair as a site of both oppression and liberation. The desire for products that honored natural texture, rather than altered it, began to gain momentum, even if the industry was slow to respond.

Intermediate

Moving beyond the foundational understanding, the intermediate examination of Decolonizing Beauty Markets reveals a dynamic process that reshapes not only consumer choices but also the very infrastructure of the beauty industry. This phase of understanding delves into the practicalities of challenging established norms, emphasizing the intricate relationship between product, community, and the deep wellspring of ancestral knowledge. It is a recognition that the path to decolonization is multifaceted, requiring conscious engagement at every level of the beauty ecosystem.

The concept of Decolonizing Beauty Markets means more than simply offering products for textured hair; it implies a systemic re-evaluation of how beauty is conceived, marketed, and consumed. It challenges the historical exclusion of Black and mixed-race hair experiences from mainstream narratives, demanding a seat at the table not just for representation, but for genuine co-creation and ownership. This shift involves a critical look at everything from ingredient sourcing and formulation to advertising imagery and the economic models that underpin the industry.

This perspective acknowledges that the beauty industry, like many global systems, has been shaped by a colonial mindset that often extracts resources and knowledge from marginalized communities without equitable return. Decolonizing this space requires a conscious effort to reverse these historical patterns, fostering true reciprocity and respect for the origins of ingredients, practices, and aesthetic inspirations. It is a call for accountability and for the rebuilding of trust between consumers and brands, grounded in authenticity and shared values.

The intermediate phase of decolonizing beauty markets involves actively dismantling exploitative structures, fostering equitable relationships, and celebrating diverse hair expressions rooted in community wisdom.

Reclaiming the Supply Chain ❉ From Source to Strand

A significant aspect of Decolonizing Beauty Markets involves scrutinizing and transforming the supply chains that bring beauty products to consumers. Historically, colonial enterprises often relied on the exploitation of natural resources and labor from colonized lands, with little benefit returning to the indigenous communities. This pattern regrettably persisted in the beauty industry, where valuable ingredients native to Africa, such as shea butter, argan oil, and various botanical extracts, were often sourced without fair compensation or respect for traditional custodians of the land and its knowledge.

Reclaiming the supply chain means prioritizing ethical sourcing practices that ensure fair trade, equitable partnerships, and sustainable harvesting. It demands transparency regarding where ingredients come from, how they are cultivated, and who benefits from their trade. This extends to acknowledging and compensating the ancestral knowledge that identified these ingredients’ properties and traditional uses. For instance, the deep understanding of shea butter’s emollient and protective qualities for textured hair is not a recent discovery; it is a legacy of generations of African women who have cultivated and utilized it for centuries.

Furthermore, this reclamation extends to the formulation of products themselves. Decolonized beauty products for textured hair often prioritize natural, nourishing ingredients that align with ancestral care practices, moving away from harsh chemicals that historically dominated the market. This includes a return to botanical oils, butters, and herbs known for their restorative properties, fostering hair health rather than forcing it into unnatural states. The scientific validation of these ancient practices, which once seemed “unscientific” through a Eurocentric lens, now supports a shift towards more gentle and effective formulations.

The Echo of Community ❉ Collective Care and Shared Wisdom

The journey of Decolonizing Beauty Markets is inherently communal, reflecting the collective spirit that has long characterized hair care traditions in Black and mixed-race communities. In many ancestral cultures, hair styling was not an individual act but a shared experience, a time for storytelling, bonding, and the transmission of intergenerational wisdom. This communal aspect provides a powerful counter-narrative to the individualized, often isolating, consumerism promoted by mainstream beauty industries.

The resurgence of the natural hair movement, which gained significant momentum in the early 2000s, stands as a powerful testament to this communal spirit. It was a grassroots movement, fueled by online communities, forums, and social gatherings where individuals shared tips, celebrated their natural textures, and offered mutual support in navigating a world still largely unaccustomed to diverse hair expressions. This collective awakening fostered a sense of belonging and solidarity, enabling many to shed the pressures of conformity and embrace their authentic selves.

Decolonizing beauty markets means recognizing and amplifying these community voices. It involves creating spaces, both physical and digital, where knowledge can be exchanged freely, where traditional practices are honored, and where individuals feel seen and affirmed in their hair journeys. This communal aspect is not merely about sharing product recommendations; it is about rebuilding cultural connections that were fractured by colonial impositions, fostering a shared sense of pride and resilience.

• Oral Histories ❉ Preserving and sharing the stories of hair care passed down through families and communities, ensuring that ancestral practices are not lost.
• Community Workshops ❉ Organizing gatherings where traditional styling techniques, ingredient preparation, and holistic hair health principles are taught and practiced collectively.
• Digital Platforms ❉ Utilizing online spaces to connect individuals across the diaspora, facilitating the exchange of knowledge and fostering a global community of textured hair enthusiasts.

Beyond the Bottle ❉ Identity and Self-Acceptance

The work of Decolonizing Beauty Markets extends far beyond the products themselves; it reaches into the deeply personal realms of identity and self-acceptance. For generations, the pressure to conform to Eurocentric beauty standards created a pervasive sense of inadequacy and self-rejection among many Black and mixed-race individuals. Straightening hair was often perceived as a prerequisite for professional success, social acceptance, and even personal beauty, creating a profound disconnect from one’s natural self.

Decolonizing beauty, then, becomes an act of profound self-love and cultural affirmation. It involves consciously choosing to celebrate the inherent beauty of textured hair in all its variations, recognizing it as a direct link to ancestral heritage and a symbol of resilience. This internal shift is as crucial as any external market transformation, as it addresses the psychological scars left by colonial beauty ideals.

This process also entails challenging the insidious messaging that continues to equate straight hair with “neatness” or “professionalism.” It means advocating for policies like the CROWN Act, which protects against discrimination based on race-based hairstyles, acknowledging that hair discrimination is a manifestation of systemic racism. By dismantling these discriminatory practices, the beauty market can truly become a space of liberation, where individuals are free to express their identity without fear of prejudice or economic disadvantage. The journey of self-acceptance, often supported by community and a deeper understanding of hair science, becomes a powerful force for change within the broader beauty landscape.

Academic

The academic understanding of Decolonizing Beauty Markets requires a rigorous, multi-disciplinary lens, drawing from cultural studies, economic sociology, public health, and critical race theory. It is a complex theoretical construct that interrogates the systemic manifestations of colonial power within the global beauty industry, particularly as they pertain to textured hair and its historical and contemporary commodification. This interpretation moves beyond surface-level critiques to examine the deep structural biases, economic exploitations, and epistemic violences that have shaped beauty standards and consumption patterns across the African diaspora.

The scholarly delineation of Decolonizing Beauty Markets involves a critical analysis of how Eurocentric aesthetic paradigms became globally hegemonic, often through the coercive mechanisms of colonialism and post-colonial economic structures. This hegemonic influence did not merely suggest a preference for certain hair textures; it actively devalued and stigmatized Afro-textured hair, creating a pervasive cultural and economic imperative for its alteration. The implication of this historical trajectory is a beauty market that, for centuries, has operated as a tool of cultural assimilation, generating substantial profits from the insecurities fostered by imposed ideals.

Furthermore, this academic perspective clarifies the interconnected incidences across fields, demonstrating how the beauty industry’s colonial legacy intersects with public health disparities, environmental justice concerns, and broader questions of economic equity. It is a statement that beauty is not apolitical; rather, it is a site where historical power imbalances are continually reproduced and, critically, where resistance and liberation can be actualized. The meaning of Decolonizing Beauty Markets, in this context, extends to a call for epistemological shifts, re-centering indigenous knowledge systems and ancestral practices as legitimate and valuable sources of wisdom for hair care and holistic wellbeing.

Defining the Unbound Helix ❉ A Scholarly Lens

Decolonizing Beauty Markets, from an academic vantage point, signifies a comprehensive theoretical and practical framework aimed at dismantling the colonial, racial, and gendered hierarchies embedded within the global beauty industry. Its primary intention is to redress the historical and ongoing marginalization of non-Eurocentric beauty ideals, particularly those pertaining to Afro-textured hair. This framework involves not merely diversifying product lines or marketing imagery, but fundamentally re-evaluating the underlying economic structures, scientific epistemologies, and cultural narratives that have historically privileged certain aesthetics while devaluing others. It is an elucidation of the mechanisms through which beauty has been weaponized as a tool of social control and economic extraction.

The designation “Decolonizing Beauty Markets” signifies a deliberate move towards self-determination and cultural sovereignty within the beauty sphere. It encompasses several key dimensions ❉

1. Epistemic Re-Centering ❉ This involves validating and elevating ancestral knowledge systems and traditional practices concerning hair care, which were often dismissed as unscientific or primitive under colonial rule. It acknowledges that communities held sophisticated understandings of botany, chemistry, and hair biology long before Western scientific validation.
2. Economic Restructuring ❉ This dimension addresses the historical exploitation of labor and resources from formerly colonized regions, advocating for fair trade, equitable ownership, and community-led enterprises that ensure wealth circulates within the communities whose heritage inspires the products.
3. Narrative Reclamation ❉ This aspect focuses on challenging and transforming dominant beauty narratives that perpetuate Eurocentric ideals, replacing them with authentic, affirming representations of diverse hair textures and skin tones, thereby fostering self-acceptance and pride.
4. Policy Advocacy ❉ This includes advocating for legislative changes, such as anti-discrimination laws related to hair (e.g. the CROWN Act), and stricter regulations on harmful chemicals disproportionately found in products marketed to Black women, addressing systemic barriers to equitable beauty practices.

The specification of this concept acknowledges that the beauty industry has historically profited from the insecurity and forced assimilation of marginalized populations. Its substance is therefore inherently liberatory, seeking to restore dignity, agency, and health to individuals and communities whose beauty traditions have been systematically suppressed or appropriated. The academic inquiry into Decolonizing Beauty Markets scrutinizes the historical conditioning that led to the widespread adoption of practices detrimental to the health and cultural integrity of textured hair, such as chemical straightening.

The Economic Tapestry of Imposition ❉ A Case Study in Health Disparity

To grasp the full weight of Decolonizing Beauty Markets, one must examine the tangible, often devastating, consequences of historically imposed beauty standards. A particularly stark example resides in the widespread adoption of chemical hair relaxers within Black communities, a phenomenon deeply intertwined with the desire for social acceptance and economic opportunity in a society that valued straight hair. This historical preference, cultivated through centuries of systemic oppression, created a massive market for products designed to chemically alter the natural structure of Afro-textured hair.

The economic landscape of the mid-20th century saw the rapid expansion of the chemical relaxer industry, with companies like Johnson Products becoming pioneers in a burgeoning market. These products, often containing harsh lye (sodium hydroxide) or other strong alkaline agents, promised a pathway to conformity, a means to navigate professional and social spaces where natural Black hair was often deemed “unprofessional” or “unruly”. While Black entrepreneurs initially led some of these ventures, larger, often white-owned, corporations quickly entered the lucrative market, capitalizing on the deeply ingrained societal pressures.

The hidden cost of this market dominance, however, was a significant public health burden. Research has increasingly illuminated the alarming connections between the frequent and long-term use of chemical hair relaxers and various adverse health outcomes, disproportionately affecting Black women. A compelling study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute (Chang et al. 2022) revealed a statistically significant association between the use of chemical hair straightening products and an increased risk of uterine cancer.

Specifically, women who reported using hair straightening products more than four times a year were found to have a higher risk of developing uterine cancer. Further, studies from the Black Women’s Health Study (BWHS) at Boston University have shown that postmenopausal Black women who used hair relaxers more than twice a year or for more than five years experienced a greater than 50% increased risk of uterine cancer. These findings are supported by a body of research linking relaxer use to other gynecological conditions, including uterine fibroids and ovarian cancer, due to the presence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals like phthalates and parabens in these products.

The historical reliance on chemical relaxers, driven by Eurocentric beauty ideals, has been linked to significant health disparities, including a greater than 50% increased risk of uterine cancer for frequent users among postmenopausal Black women.

This specific historical example powerfully illuminates the profound connection between Decolonizing Beauty Markets and textured hair heritage. The market for relaxers was not a neutral development; it was a direct consequence of a colonial beauty standard that systematically devalued natural Black hair. The subsequent health consequences underscore the deep harm inflicted when an industry prioritizes imposed aesthetics over the wellbeing of its consumers. The economic gains of these companies were, in many instances, built upon the physical and psychological toll on Black women.

The recent decline in relaxer sales, with a 38% drop between 2012 and 2017, and a 26% decrease from 2010 to 2015, reflects a conscious shift away from these harmful practices, propelled by the natural hair movement and increased awareness of health risks. This movement is a clear demonstration of market decolonization in action, as consumers reclaim their natural textures and demand safer, more affirming products.

Re-Centering Indigenous Knowledge ❉ Epistemological Shifts

A core tenet of Decolonizing Beauty Markets involves a fundamental epistemological shift, moving away from the sole authority of Western scientific frameworks and re-centering the validity of indigenous knowledge systems. For millennia, various African and diasporic communities developed sophisticated hair care practices rooted in a deep understanding of natural ingredients, environmental rhythms, and the specific needs of textured hair. This knowledge, often transmitted orally and through communal practice, was systematically devalued or ignored under colonial regimes.

The meaning of decolonization, in this context, is a recognition that these ancestral practices are not merely anecdotal or folkloric; they represent a rich repository of empirical observation, trial-and-error, and holistic wisdom. The use of natural butters, plant extracts, and specific oils for moisture, strength, and scalp health, long practiced in African traditions, now finds validation in modern cosmetic science. For instance, the use of shea butter, derived from the African shea tree, has been a cornerstone of West African hair care for its emollient and protective qualities, a traditional application now recognized globally for its efficacy in moisturizing and sealing textured strands.

This re-centering demands that beauty research and product development move beyond a Eurocentric lens, actively seeking out and collaborating with communities who hold this ancestral knowledge. It involves an ethical responsibility to compensate and credit these communities, ensuring that the benefits of this knowledge are shared equitably. The shift is from a model of extraction and appropriation to one of reciprocity and mutual respect, where traditional wisdom is seen as a legitimate and powerful source of innovation in the beauty sphere. This also encourages a move towards formulations that are in harmony with the body and the environment, echoing ancient principles of balance and sustainability.

The Legal and Social Architectures of Liberation

The Decolonizing Beauty Markets movement also manifests through tangible legal and social architectures designed to protect and affirm textured hair. The persistent discrimination faced by individuals with Afro-textured hair in schools, workplaces, and public spaces is a direct consequence of colonial beauty standards that deemed natural Black hair as unprofessional or unkempt. This discrimination is not merely social; it has significant economic and psychological ramifications, limiting opportunities and fostering internalized biases.

The development and adoption of legislation like the CROWN Act (Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair) in various U.S. states represent a critical step in this decolonization process. This act, which prohibits discrimination based on hair texture and protective hairstyles associated with race, directly challenges the systemic bias that has historically penalized individuals for wearing their hair in its natural state. Its existence underscores the reality that beauty standards have been legally enforced mechanisms of control, and their dismantling requires legal intervention.

Furthermore, social movements and advocacy groups play a pivotal role in shifting public perception and challenging the underlying colonial narratives. Through education, media representation, and community organizing, these groups work to normalize and celebrate the diversity of textured hair, fostering a collective sense of pride and challenging the pervasive influence of Eurocentric ideals. This includes pushing for greater transparency in product labeling, advocating for the removal of harmful chemicals, and demanding that the beauty industry truly serve the needs of all consumers, not just a privileged few. The sustained pressure from these movements ensures that the discourse around Decolonizing Beauty Markets remains active and impactful, moving beyond theoretical discussions to tangible societal change.

Reflection on the Heritage of Decolonizing Beauty Markets

As we contemplate the meaning of Decolonizing Beauty Markets, we recognize it as an ongoing, living process, much like the growth of a strand of hair itself – a continuous unfolding from root to tip, deeply connected to its ancestral source. This movement is not a fleeting trend; it represents a profound return, a homecoming to the inherent wisdom and dignity that has always resided within textured hair. It is the very ‘Soul of a Strand’ speaking, whispering stories of resilience, creativity, and self-possession that span generations and continents.

The journey of decolonization in beauty is one of deep listening – to the echoes from ancient practices, to the tender threads of communal care, and to the unbound helix of individual and collective identity. It is about understanding that the science of our hair is not separate from its history or its spirit. The meticulous crafting of ancestral remedies, the communal rituals of styling, and the very structure of each curl and coil tell a story of ingenuity and survival. This story is now being re-written, not with a pen of imposed ideals, but with the loving hands of those who honor their heritage.

This enduring significance lies in its capacity to heal. By dismantling the remnants of colonial beauty standards, we mend fractured relationships – with our hair, with our bodies, and with our ancestral past. It is a powerful affirmation that true beauty blossoms when authenticity is celebrated, when diversity is revered, and when the care we extend to our hair is an extension of the deep reverence we hold for our entire being. The work continues, strand by strand, heart by heart, weaving a future where every textured crown is recognized as a masterpiece of heritage and an expression of boundless freedom.

References

• Coogan, P. F. et al. (2015). Hair relaxer use and risk of uterine leiomyomata in the Black Women’s Health Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 182(2), 164-173.
• James-Todd, T. M. et al. (2020). Hair product use and fibroid risk in a cohort of African American women. Environmental Health Perspectives, 128(10), 107001.
• Bertrand, K. A. et al. (2023). Hair relaxer use and risk of uterine cancer in the Black Women’s Health Study. Environmental Research, 239(Pt 1), 117228.
• Thejembe. (2023). The Evolution of Natural Hair Products for Black Women. Thejembe.com .
• TSPA Battle Creek. (2024). The Enduring Influence of Black Culture on the Cosmetology Industry. TSPA Battle Creek Blog .
• NewYork-Presbyterian. (2024). What to Know About the Connection Between Hair Relaxers and Uterine Cancer. Health Matters .
• Consumer Safety Group. (2024). Hair Relaxers and Health ❉ Unveiling the Hidden Risks of Chemical Hair Straighteners. ConsumerSafety.org .
• Makoe, T. (2024). Black hair ❉ our past, present and future. Cape Times .
• Black Women’s Health Study. (2023). Press Release ❉ First Large Study of Hair Relaxers Among Black Women Finds Increased Risk of Uterine Cancer. Boston University .
• Fox, T. (2023). What Every Dermatologist Must Know About the History of Black Hair. Dermatology Times .
• Bridgewater, S. (2011). The oppressive roots of hair relaxer. The Commonwealth Times .
• Council, J. (2022). Black Women Going Natural Push Entire Industry To The Brink Of Extinction. Forbes .
• Fabulive. (2023). Rediscovering Historical Hair Care Practices. Fabulive.com .
• Byrd, A. & Tharps, L. L. (2001). Hair Story ❉ Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America. St. Martin’s Press. (General knowledge, not specific citation for text content, but foundational for the topic).
• Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History. (2017). Black Women and Beauty Culture in 20th-Century America. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History .
• NativeMag. (2020). Examining the history and value of African hair. NativeMag.com .
• African American Museum of Iowa. (n.d.). History of Hair. African American Museum of Iowa .
• Duru, M. E. & Duru, L. (2025). Historical Perspectives on Hair Care and Common Styling Practices in Black Women. Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology .
• IOL. (2024). Black hair ❉ our past, present and future. IOL.co.za .
• Fox, T. (2021). The Evolution of Black Hair for Beauty & Resistance. Thrifts & Tangles .
• Simon, A. (2024). Relaxers, A Retrospective. BlackBeautyPop .
• Sargent, M. A. et al. (2022). Chemical/Straightening and Other Hair Product Usage during Childhood, Adolescence, and Adulthood among African-American Women ❉ Potential Implications for Health. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2022, 1-10.
• Moore, N. (2024). Thousands of Black women are suing chemical relaxer makers over cancer risks. NPR .
• TIME. (1980). Business ❉ Black Beauty. TIME Magazine .
• Omondi, P. et al. (2025). Chemicals of concern in select packaged hair relaxers available on the Kenyan market ❉ an examination of ingredient labels and measurement of pH. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1373575.
• Patient.info. (2023). What’s the link between hair relaxers and fibroids?. Patient.info .
• Coplan + Crane. (2023). Is there a Link Between Hair Relaxers and Fibroids?. Coplan + Crane .
• Upson, K. et al. (2025). Hair Straightener Use in Relation to Prevalent and Incident Fibroids in the Sister Study with a Focus on Black Women. Environmental Health Perspectives, 133(1), 017004.
• Capital B News. (2024). As Many Black Women in U.S. Abandon Hair Relaxers Linked to Cancer, Sales Climb in African Countries. Capital B News .
• Ganesan, K. et al. (2024). A systematic review of association between use of hair products and benign and malignant gynecological conditions. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 60, e23249.
• Reynolds, E. et al. (2024). From Knowledge to Advocacy ❉ Bridging the gap between research and action. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 2024(62), 160-164.
• Centro Sur. (2021). Organizational and economic structures of ancestral communes. Centro Sur .
• Times of India. (2021). Hair care ❉ 5 Natural practices for better hair. Times of India .