Crown Act Louisiana

Fundamentals

The Crown Act Louisiana, a significant legislative achievement, serves as a protective shield against discrimination based on hair texture and specific hairstyles. This legal instrument, officially known as the Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair Act, arrived in Louisiana’s legal landscape on June 16, 2022, becoming effective on August 1, 2022. Its core objective is to prohibit the denial of opportunities in crucial areas of life—employment, education, public accommodations, and housing—simply because of one’s natural, protective, or culturally significant hair. The Act’s designation as a law reflects a growing recognition that hair, particularly for individuals of Black and mixed-race heritage, is far more than a mere aesthetic choice; it is a profound expression of identity, a link to ancestral traditions, and a deeply personal aspect of being.

At its foundational level, the Crown Act Louisiana aims to dismantle deeply ingrained biases that have historically marginalized textured hair. It stands as a clear statement that hair, in its natural state or styled in ways that honor cultural practices, should never be a barrier to participation in society. This legislative measure addresses a long-standing grievance where Eurocentric beauty standards often dictated what was deemed “professional” or “acceptable,” leaving individuals with coiled, kinky, or braided hair vulnerable to unfair treatment. The very name, CROWN, encapsulates this spirit, seeking to honor and uplift the diverse beauty of hair that has been historically denigrated.

Historical Echoes of Hair Regulation

To grasp the profound meaning of the Crown Act Louisiana, one must consider the historical context of hair regulation in the state. Louisiana holds a unique, often somber, place in the narrative of hair-based oppression. In 1786, under Spanish colonial rule, Governor Esteban Rodríguez Miró enacted the infamous Tignon Laws . These laws mandated that free Black women in New Orleans, whose elaborate hairstyles and vibrant adornments were seen as challenging racial hierarchies and attracting white men, were compelled to cover their hair with a simple cloth known as a “tignon.” This was a deliberate act of social control, a visual marker intended to diminish their perceived status and align them with enslaved women.

The Tignon Laws, enacted in 1786, serve as a stark historical precedent for the systemic control and denigration of Black hair in Louisiana.

The historical experience of the Tignon Laws offers a poignant backdrop to the contemporary necessity of the Crown Act. While the Tignon Laws sought to erase visibility and impose a visual subservience, the Crown Act Louisiana works to restore the freedom of expression and inherent dignity that such historical mandates sought to suppress. It is a legal affirmation that the rich legacy of textured hair, far from being a subject of regulation, is a cherished aspect of cultural identity deserving of protection. The law’s reach extends beyond mere employment or educational settings; it touches the very fabric of how individuals are perceived and treated within the broader public sphere, reflecting a deep societal shift toward recognizing the intrinsic value of diverse hair heritage.

The legislation lists a range of protected hairstyles, including but not limited to ❉

• Afros ❉ A natural style that allows hair to grow out from the scalp in a rounded shape, a powerful symbol of Black pride and identity during the Civil Rights Movement.
• Dreadlocks (Locs) ❉ Formed by braiding or coiling hair into rope-like strands, carrying deep spiritual and cultural significance for many.
• Twists ❉ A style created by twisting two strands of hair around each other, offering versatility and protective benefits.
• Braids ❉ A traditional technique of interweaving three or more strands of hair, with a history spanning thousands of years in African cultures.
• Cornrow Braids ❉ Tightly braided rows that lie flat against the scalp, often used historically as a means of communication and a symbol of resistance.
• Bantu Knots ❉ A protective style where sections of hair are twisted and coiled into small, tight buns, originating from Southern Africa.
• Curls ❉ Recognizing the natural pattern of textured hair, affirming its inherent beauty without alteration.

This comprehensive listing serves as a guiding light, offering a clear Delineation of what constitutes protected hairstyles, ensuring that individuals can wear their hair in ways that honor their heritage without fear of unfair repercussions.

Intermediate

Moving beyond the fundamental tenets, the Crown Act Louisiana assumes an intermediate Significance as a legislative acknowledgment of the systemic prejudice embedded within societal norms concerning hair. This Act does not merely prohibit overt acts of discrimination; it challenges the subtle, often unspoken, biases that have historically dictated standards of professionalism and beauty, particularly impacting individuals with textured hair. The legislation’s passage in Louisiana, a state with a profound and intricate history of racial dynamics, speaks volumes about the enduring need to address the legacy of hair-based oppression. Its adoption on June 16, 2022, and subsequent effectiveness on August 1, 2022, positions Louisiana as a vital participant in a broader national movement to affirm the dignity of natural hair.

The intermediate Interpretation of the Crown Act Louisiana involves understanding its specific amendments to existing state laws. It revises the Louisiana Employment Discrimination Law (La. R.S. 23:332) and the Louisiana Commission on Human Rights law (La.

R.S. 51:2232), extending protections to encompass “natural, protective, or cultural hairstyles” in employment, education, public accommodations, and housing. This legislative adjustment represents a conscious effort to realign legal frameworks with a more equitable understanding of racial identity and cultural expression. The very act of codifying these protections sends a powerful message ❉ the state recognizes that denying someone an opportunity based on their hair is, at its core, a form of racial bias.

The Deep Roots of Hair Discrimination

The history of hair discrimination, which the Crown Act Louisiana seeks to redress, is deeply intertwined with the historical subjugation of Black bodies and cultures. From the forced shaving of heads during the transatlantic slave trade—a deliberate act to strip enslaved Africans of their identity and cultural ties—to the “Tignon Laws” of colonial Louisiana, hair has been a site of control and resistance. These historical policies aimed to dehumanize and enforce racial hierarchies by dictating how Black individuals could present themselves. The Crown Act Louisiana, therefore, represents a modern-day counter-narrative, asserting the right to self-expression that has been historically denied.

A 2023 research study highlighted the pervasive nature of this prejudice, revealing that Black Women’s Hair is 2.5 Times as Likely as White Women’s Hair to Be Perceived as “unprofessional.” This statistic underscores the deeply entrenched nature of Eurocentric beauty standards within professional environments, a reality that the Crown Act Louisiana directly confronts. It is a compelling illustration of how subjective perceptions of “neatness” or “professionalism” often serve as veiled conduits for racial bias, compelling many Black women to alter their natural hair textures, often through damaging chemical or heat treatments, to conform to these narrow expectations.

Beyond mere legality, the Crown Act Louisiana seeks to challenge the societal norms that have historically labeled textured hair as unprofessional, thereby fostering a more inclusive understanding of appearance.

The Act’s inclusion of “cultural hairstyles” is particularly noteworthy, recognizing that hair practices are not merely personal choices but often carry profound communal and ancestral meaning. This provision acknowledges the diversity within textured hair experiences, protecting styles that might be specific to certain African or diasporic traditions, further reinforcing the Act’s commitment to heritage. It moves beyond a narrow focus on race to embrace the broader spectrum of cultural expression tied to hair.

The Crown Act Louisiana, in its intermediate understanding, therefore serves as a crucial legal intervention, one that seeks to rectify historical wrongs and create environments where the authenticity of one’s hair is not a liability but a respected aspect of their being. Its practical application requires institutions to re-evaluate their policies and biases, fostering a climate where the rich legacy of textured hair is understood and honored.

Academic

The Crown Act Louisiana, from an academic perspective, represents a profound legislative Delineation against the enduring structures of systemic racism, particularly as they manifest through hair discrimination. This legal instrument, officially enacted as Act No. 529 on August 1, 2022, serves as a critical amendment to the Louisiana Employment Discrimination Law (La. R.S.

23:332) and the Louisiana Commission on Human Rights law (La. R.S. 51:2232), expanding the definition of unlawful discrimination to explicitly include “natural, protective, or cultural hairstyle.” Its Meaning transcends mere legalistic prohibitions; it is a socio-legal intervention challenging deeply internalized Eurocentric beauty standards that have historically relegated textured hair to categories of “unprofessional” or “unruly.”

Scholarly inquiry into the Crown Act Louisiana reveals its intricate connection to the broader discourse on identity politics, cultural equity, and the psychological impact of microaggressions. The Act acknowledges that hair, for individuals of African descent, is not merely a biological attribute but a repository of cultural memory , a tangible link to ancestral practices, and a dynamic expression of selfhood. Discriminatory practices targeting textured hair, therefore, represent an assault on this rich heritage, contributing to what researchers identify as significant psychological distress, including internalized racism, anxiety, and a compromised sense of self-worth.

The Sociological and Psychological Dimensions of Hair Discrimination

The academic Elucidation of hair discrimination often draws upon critical race theory and intersectionality, revealing how biases against textured hair disproportionately affect Black women and girls. A compelling empirical study by Dove and LinkedIn (2023) reported that Black Women’s Hair is 2.5 Times More Likely to Be Perceived as “unprofessional” in the Workplace Than White Women’s Hair. Furthermore, the study indicates that approximately two-thirds (66%) of Black women alter their hair for job interviews, with 41% changing from curly to straight styles. This pervasive societal pressure compels individuals to modify their natural appearance, often at the cost of physical hair damage from heat or chemical treatments, and more significantly, at the expense of their psychological well-being.

The psychological toll of hair discrimination extends beyond surface-level aesthetics, impacting self-esteem and cultural connection.

The academic interpretation of the Crown Act Louisiana, therefore, considers its potential to mitigate these adverse psychological outcomes. By legally validating natural and protective hairstyles, the Act creates a safer space for individuals to express their authentic selves without fear of reprisal. This is particularly salient for younger generations, as research indicates that 66% of Black children in majority-white schools have experienced race-based hair discrimination by the age of 12. Such early experiences of judgment and exclusion can profoundly shape a child’s developing self-image and relationship with their heritage.

The Crown Act Louisiana also compels a re-examination of institutional grooming policies through an anti-racist lens. Policies demanding “neat, smooth, or straight hair” or prohibiting “frizzy, coarse, or kinky” textures can be inherently discriminatory, reflecting a Eurocentric aesthetic bias rather than a genuine concern for hygiene or safety. The Act’s Specification of protected styles—including Afros, Dreadlocks, Twists, Locs, Braids, Cornrow Braids, and Bantu Knots—serves as a clear directive for organizations to revise their codes of conduct, aligning them with principles of equity and cultural sensitivity.

Interconnected Incidences and Long-Term Consequences

The Crown Act Louisiana operates within a broader academic understanding of how seemingly minor instances of discrimination contribute to cumulative disadvantage. For instance, the denial of educational opportunities due to hair policies, as seen in cases like Deandre Arnold, who was prevented from participating in his high school graduation because of his locs, or Ava Russell, a 9-year-old sent home for her curls, illustrates the real-world impact of such biases. These individual experiences aggregate into systemic barriers that can affect academic achievement, career trajectories, and overall life chances. The Act seeks to disrupt this cycle, promoting an environment where an individual’s potential is judged by their capabilities, not their hair.

Moreover, the Act’s academic Significance lies in its potential to influence future policy and research. It provides a legal framework for studying the long-term consequences of hair discrimination on mental health, economic mobility, and cultural preservation. Scholars can now analyze the effectiveness of such legislation in fostering more inclusive environments and challenging deeply ingrained prejudices.

The legislative Designation of hair as a protected characteristic invites further academic exploration into the socio-historical construction of beauty standards and the pathways toward decolonizing aesthetic norms. It prompts questions about how legal mandates can contribute to shifts in societal attitudes, paving the way for a more just and culturally affirming future.

The Crown Act Louisiana, therefore, stands as a testament to the ongoing struggle for racial equity, a legal recognition of the profound cultural Import of textured hair, and a catalyst for continued academic and societal dialogue on the meaning of true inclusion. It is a legislative acknowledgment that the journey toward justice requires addressing not only overt acts of prejudice but also the subtle, yet pervasive, forms of discrimination that impact the very fabric of identity.

Reflection on the Heritage of Crown Act Louisiana

The Crown Act Louisiana stands as a living testament within Roothea’s archives, a profound meditation on the enduring spirit of textured hair and its boundless heritage. Its passage is not merely a legislative milestone; it is a resonant echo of ancestral wisdom, a legal affirmation of the inherent dignity woven into every coil, kink, and braid. For centuries, the hair of Black and mixed-race individuals has been a canvas of communication, a chronicle of lineage, and a sacred vessel of identity.

From the intricate patterns that conveyed social status and tribal affiliation in ancient African societies to the cornrows that secretly mapped paths to freedom during enslavement, hair has always been a language, a defiant act of cultural preservation. The Crown Act Louisiana, in this profound context, is a contemporary ritual of reclamation, inviting us to remember and honor the journey of each strand.

This legislative act gently reminds us that the quest for holistic wellness extends beyond the physical realm, touching the deepest chambers of our self-perception and cultural connection. The very notion of “good hair” versus “bad hair,” a concept deeply rooted in colonial subjugation and Eurocentric beauty ideals, has inflicted generations of psychological burdens. The Act, by protecting natural and cultural hairstyles, creates a fertile ground for healing, allowing individuals to shed the weight of imposed standards and embrace the authentic beauty of their genetic legacy. It is a whispered affirmation from the ancestors, encouraging us to find peace in our natural form, to see our hair not as something to be managed or conformed, but as a crown bestowed by heritage.

The journey of textured hair, from the elemental biology of its unique follicular structure to the living traditions of care passed down through generations, finds its voice in the Crown Act Louisiana. This law encourages a deeper appreciation for the ancestral practices of oiling, braiding, and adorning hair—rituals that were not only about aesthetics but also about communal bonding, spiritual alignment, and practical preservation. It fosters an environment where the wisdom of these traditions can continue to flourish, unburdened by societal judgment. The Act, therefore, is more than a legal document; it is a declaration of reverence for the intricate, resilient, and deeply meaningful history of Black and mixed-race hair, ensuring that its unbound helix can continue to shape futures with pride and authenticity.

References

• Byrd, A. & Tharps, L. (2001). Hair Story ❉ Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America. St. Martin’s Press.
• Dabiri, E. (2020). Twisted ❉ The Tangled History of Black Hair Culture. Harper Perennial.
• DeGruy, J. (2005). Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome ❉ America’s Legacy of Enduring Injury and Healing. Joy DeGruy Publications.
• Duke University & Michigan State University. (2020). The Natural Hair Bias in Job Recruitment .
• Mbilishaka, A. M. (2024). Don’t Get It Twisted ❉ Untangling the Psychology of Hair Discrimination Within Black Communities. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry .
• Rooks, N. (1996). Hair Raising ❉ Beauty, Culture, and African American Women. Rutgers University Press.
• The CROWN Coalition. (2023). 2023 Workplace Research Study .
• The CROWN Coalition. (2021). 2021 CROWN Research Study for Girls .