
Roots
The very air we breathe carries whispers of heritage, echoes of journeys long past, and for many, the story of their hair. Why, then, in spaces meant to honor artistry and personal expression—our beauty programs—does the vibrant, complex narrative of textured hair often stand muted, relegated to the margins or simply unheard? This omission speaks volumes, telling tales far beyond mere curriculum oversight.
It hints at a historical dis-ease, a systemic amnesia that has long preferred uniformity to the rich diversity of human crowning glories. The absence of comprehensive textured hair training in mainstream cosmetology education is not a simple gap in knowledge; it is a profound silence, a dismissal of ancestral practices, scientific peculiarities, and cultural significance that has shaped identities across generations.
Consider the deep origins of human hair itself. While all hair emerges from follicles, the journey of textured hair through evolutionary time has led to structures profoundly distinct from straight strands. The intricate helical shape, the density of follicles, the very way light interacts with a coil—these are not mere variations but adaptations, perhaps to offer enhanced thermoregulation and protection from solar radiation, as biological anthropologist Tina Lasisi’s research suggests.
This foundational understanding, rooted in our elemental biology, sets the stage for appreciating why care methods must vary. When we acknowledge these biophysical truths, we also recognize the enduring wisdom of those who first understood how to nurture these unique strands, long before microscopes revealed their inner workings.

What Ancestral Hair Knowledges Inform Modern Understanding?
In pre-colonial Africa, hair was far more than an adornment; it served as a living lexicon, a visual marker of one’s standing, spiritual beliefs, geographic origin, marital status, age, and ethnic identity. The Yoruba people of Nigeria, for instance, held hair as the most elevated part of the body, believing intricate braided styles could convey messages to the gods. These communal rituals, often spanning hours or even days, involved not just styling but washing, oiling, and decorating with materials like shells, beads, or cloth, serving as profound opportunities for social bonding and the transmission of cultural knowledge from elders to younger generations. Such practices were not casual acts of grooming; they were codified, specific to ethnic groups, and deeply interwoven with societal structures.
The historical marginalization of textured hair in beauty education is a profound dismissal of ancestral practices and the scientific distinctiveness of coily and curly strands.
The systematic disregard of textured hair in professional beauty education often stems from a historical lens that prioritizes Eurocentric beauty standards. During the transatlantic slave trade, enslavers often shaved the heads of captured Africans upon arrival in the Americas, a dehumanizing act designed to strip them of their cultural identity and sever visible links to their heritage. This act of cultural erasure, coupled with the harsh realities of forced labor, meant that ancestral hair practices had to adapt, becoming covert acts of resistance and survival.
The concept of “good hair” began to emerge, categorizing straighter textures as superior and reinforcing discriminatory ideals that persist to this day. This historical context is not merely background; it is the very fabric upon which modern beauty curricula were, and largely remain, draped.

How Does Historical Bias Shape Textured Hair Lexicon?
The very language used within the beauty industry to describe textured hair often carries the weight of this historical bias. Terms like “nappy,” once a derogatory label, have been reclaimed by African descendants, evolving to signify natural and happy in some Francophone contexts. However, the broader professional lexicon has been slow to adopt a nuanced and respectful vocabulary for the diverse spectrum of textured hair, from loose waves to the tightest coils.
Understanding the specific characteristics of various curl patterns—often categorized using systems like Andre Walker’s or the widely recognized Type 1-4 system (with sub-types A-C)—is foundational for proper care. Yet, beauty schools historically provided only brief overviews of relaxers when addressing highly textured hair, overlooking the vast array of natural textures and their unique needs.
| Aspect of Understanding Hair Function |
| Ancestral Perspectives (Pre-Colonial Africa) Symbol of identity, status, spirituality, communication. |
| Modern Cosmetology (Dominant Historical Curriculum) Aesthetic feature, subject to styling and chemical alteration. |
| Aspect of Understanding Care Rituals |
| Ancestral Perspectives (Pre-Colonial Africa) Communal, spiritual, time-intensive acts of bonding and knowledge transmission. |
| Modern Cosmetology (Dominant Historical Curriculum) Individualized service, often focused on chemical straightening or heat application. |
| Aspect of Understanding Classification |
| Ancestral Perspectives (Pre-Colonial Africa) Varied by tribal affiliation, social rank, age, marital status. |
| Modern Cosmetology (Dominant Historical Curriculum) Primarily based on straightness, with minimal focus on diverse curl patterns. |
| Aspect of Understanding Hair Health Goal |
| Ancestral Perspectives (Pre-Colonial Africa) Maintaining vitality through natural ingredients and protective styles. |
| Modern Cosmetology (Dominant Historical Curriculum) Achieving a straightened or uniform appearance, sometimes at hair's expense. |
| Aspect of Understanding The enduring wisdom of ancestral practices offers a critical counterpoint to the historically narrow scope of mainstream beauty education. |
The lexicon of textured hair extends beyond mere curl pattern descriptions to include terms that signify specific historical experiences and care techniques. Words like Cornrows, Locs, Braids, and Afro themselves carry cultural and historical weight, often linked to movements of resistance and pride. Understanding the etymology and cultural context behind these terms offers a deeper appreciation for the heritage embedded within textured hair care, moving beyond superficial aesthetics to grasp the identity and resilience they represent. The oversight of this rich linguistic landscape in beauty programs reflects a broader failing to honor the heritage connected to these hair types.

Ritual
The journey of textured hair is steeped in ritual, a testament to generations of ingenuity and connection. Yet, the absence of comprehensive textured hair training in many beauty programs creates a disjunction, severing aspiring stylists from a profound legacy of artistry and science. This void is not merely a lack of technical skill; it signifies a missed opportunity to honor and perpetuate an ancient art form that has long been integral to the identity and well-being of Black and mixed-race communities. Traditional styling techniques, honed over centuries, represent a sophisticated understanding of hair mechanics, protective principles, and aesthetic expression.

How Do Ancient Styles Echo in Modern Protective Practices?
The practice of protective styling, so vital for textured hair, finds its genesis in ancestral wisdom. African hair braiding, for instance, has roots stretching back thousands of years, with evidence dating to 3500 BCE in rock paintings depicting cornrows. These intricate patterns were not simply decorative; they communicated social status, age, tribal affiliation, and even religious beliefs. During the brutal era of the transatlantic slave trade, braiding became a subversive act of resistance.
Enslaved Africans cleverly incorporated seeds into their braids for survival and wove secret maps into their cornrows, guiding escape routes along the Underground Railroad. This powerful historical example showcases hair styling as a tool of liberation, a far cry from a mere beauty trend. The exclusion of this heritage from modern curricula diminishes the profundity of these practices.
The techniques employed in these ancient styles demonstrate a deep understanding of preserving hair health. Styles like Bantu Knots, with roots in the Zulu tribe of South Africa, and African Hair Threading, known as “Irun Kiko” among the Yoruba people of Nigeria, were not only aesthetic but served to stretch hair and protect it from breakage. This protective philosophy contrasts sharply with some modern practices promoted in mainstream beauty schools, which historically centered on chemical straightening and heat styling, often to the detriment of textured hair’s structural integrity. The focus on altering natural texture, rather than nurturing it, has been a significant barrier to inclusive education.
The historical emphasis on altering textured hair, rather than nurturing its natural state, underscores a legacy of exclusion in beauty education.

What Tools and Transformations Carry Ancestral Narratives?
The tools of textured hair care, both ancient and contemporary, tell their own story. While early implements might have been fashioned from natural materials, the intent remained consistent ❉ to cleanse, detangle, and shape. The communal aspect of hair care, where families and communities gathered to braid and tend to one another’s hair, fostered social bonds and passed down techniques orally from one generation to the next.
This rich tradition contrasts with the often solitary, clinical environment of modern beauty schools, where such historical and cultural contexts are rarely explored. The lack of hands-on practice with textured hair, beyond a brief mention of relaxers, leaves stylists ill-equipped to serve a diverse clientele.
The advent of technologies like the hot comb in the late 1800s and chemical relaxers in the early 20th century transformed Black hair care, driven in part by societal pressures to conform to Eurocentric beauty standards. Pioneering Black entrepreneurs like Madam C.J. Walker and Annie Malone created empires by developing products tailored for Black women, even establishing their own beauty schools like Madam C.J. Walker’s Lelia College and Malone’s Poro College.
These institutions, born out of necessity in a segregated industry, provided training and employment for thousands of Black women, demonstrating a self-sufficiency and innovation that predates many mainstream beauty education reforms. Their efforts highlight that specialized training for textured hair has a deep, albeit often overlooked, heritage within the Black community.
The “Black Is Beautiful” movement of the 1960s and the subsequent natural hair movement in the 2000s marked profound cultural shifts, reclaiming natural textures like the Afro as symbols of pride and resistance against oppressive beauty norms. These movements challenged the assimilationist pressures that had long dictated Black hair choices. Despite this cultural resurgence, cosmetology education systems have been slow to adapt, with many schools still not providing adequate instruction on diverse hair types.
This lag perpetuates a cycle where stylists graduate unprepared, leaving many clients with textured hair feeling marginalized and underserved. The ritual of hair care, so deeply intertwined with identity and heritage, deserves a place of honor in all beauty programs.

Relay
The journey of textured hair, from ancient communal rituals to modern self-expression, has been a profound relay of knowledge, resilience, and identity. Its absence from mainstream beauty programs today represents a systemic failure, one deeply rooted in historical biases that prioritized Eurocentric beauty ideals and consequently devalued the rich heritage of Black and mixed-race hair. This oversight is not merely about technical skills; it is about acknowledging a vast body of ancestral wisdom, a unique biological composition, and the enduring cultural significance that textured hair holds for millions. The implications stretch far beyond the salon chair, touching upon issues of economic opportunity, psychological well-being, and cultural equity.

What Historical Foundations Explain the Absence of Textured Hair Training?
The foundational issue resides in the historical structuring of cosmetology education itself, which largely developed with a focus on fine, straight hair. As early as the 19th and early 20th centuries, as the beauty industry formalized, its standards were largely shaped by the dominant European aesthetic. This created a beauty ecosystem where hair types outside of this norm were either ignored or seen as problems to be “corrected” through chemical processing, primarily relaxers. The pioneering efforts of Black women like Annie Malone and Madam C.J.
Walker, who built vast empires and established their own beauty schools to cater specifically to Black hair needs, underscore this historical segregation. They created alternative pathways to education and empowerment precisely because mainstream avenues were exclusionary. Madam C.J. Walker, for instance, established Lelia College in 1908 and trained thousands of “hair culturists” through her network, effectively creating an parallel educational system to address the unmet needs of Black women.
The legacy of these segregated systems continues to manifest in contemporary curricula. Cosmetology schools have not evolved rapidly enough to account for changing demographics and the resurgence of natural hair. A significant example of this systemic neglect is highlighted by a 2020 Duke University study, which found that Black women with natural hairstyles were perceived as less professional and less competent, and were less likely to be recommended for job interviews compared to candidates with straight hair.
This perception directly impacts how textured hair is viewed in professional settings, including beauty education, perpetuating the idea that it is somehow less “manageable” or “professional,” despite the reality that styling Afro-textured hair requires skill and specific techniques. This prejudice translates into a curriculum that continues to be inadequate, often dedicating only a brief overview of relaxers instead of comprehensive training on cutting, coloring, and styling diverse curl patterns.

How Does Legal Evolution Influence Educational Inclusion?
The ongoing struggle for recognition and respect for textured hair has also played out in the legal arena. The CROWN Act, standing for “Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair,” was first introduced in 2019 to protect against discrimination based on race-based hairstyles or hair texture. As of September 2024, 27 states and Washington D.C. have passed CROWN laws, marking a significant step towards addressing systemic racism in appearance policies.
New York State, for example, enacted Bill S6528A in late 2023, mandating that cosmetology schools include textured hair education in their general curriculum. Louisiana also became the first state to require textured hair cutting on licensing exams in 2022. These legislative actions are direct responses to the long-standing educational deficiencies and the marginalization faced by Black clients and stylists alike. They represent a societal acknowledgment that beauty professionals must be competent across all hair types, not just those aligned with Eurocentric standards.
The CROWN Act stands as a legislative attempt to dismantle discriminatory beauty standards, pressing cosmetology education towards necessary inclusivity.
The shift towards mandating textured hair training is a critical step, but its implementation requires a deeper understanding of hair science and cultural context. Modern computational methods, such as those being developed by Yale computer scientists to visualize Afro-textured hair, highlight the complexity of these hair structures. Theodore Kim, a lead researcher, notes that prior to their work, the problem of hair rendering in computer graphics was considered “solved,” primarily based on straight hair models, revealing a broader tendency in science to ignore underrepresented populations. This mirrors the beauty industry’s historical approach, where a “solved” problem of hair care often meant solutions for straight hair, leaving textured hair outside the scope of innovation and formal study.

What Holistic Care Philosophies Inform Textured Hair Wellness?
The holistic care of textured hair extends beyond superficial treatments to encompass profound wellness philosophies rooted in ancestral practices. For instance, the traditional use of ingredients sourced directly from the earth, such as the Chébé Powder from Chad’s Bassara/Baggara Arab tribe, demonstrates an ancient understanding of moisture retention and hair vitality. These practices, often passed down intergenerationally, view hair as a sacred part of the self, deserving of meticulous and mindful care. The absence of training on these traditional ingredients and methods in many beauty programs signifies a missed opportunity to learn from diverse knowledge systems and offer a truly holistic approach to hair health.
- Shear Wisdom ❉ The profound skill required for precise cutting and shaping of textured hair, honoring its natural curl pattern and density.
- Moisture Memory ❉ The inherited understanding of how textured hair retains and loses moisture, leading to centuries-old practices of oiling and sealing.
- Pattern Recognition ❉ The intuitive ability to identify and respond to the unique coiling and spiraling patterns that dictate styling and care for textured hair.
Nighttime rituals also hold significant historical and practical importance for textured hair. The use of head wraps and bonnets, beyond their aesthetic appeal, served and continue to serve as vital protective measures against friction and moisture loss. In African villages, hair wrapping symbolized tribe and social status, evolving into a fashion statement and a practical method for preserving styles and hair health in the diaspora. The neglect of such fundamental practices within cosmetology education leaves future stylists unprepared for the realities of textured hair care, undermining their ability to connect with and serve a diverse clientele effectively.
This lack of preparedness not only limits professional opportunities but also perpetuates a sense of marginalization for individuals with textured hair. The relay of knowledge, from ancient wisdom to contemporary science, must become inclusive, recognizing the inherent value and beauty of all hair textures.

Reflection
The journey through the nuanced landscape of textured hair, its heritage, and its historical marginalization within beauty programs calls for a moment of quiet contemplation. The silence, once a stark absence in classrooms and curricula, begins to resonate with the echoes of ancestral drumbeats and the gentle whispers of mothers braiding their children’s hair under an ancient sun. This is not merely a technical oversight; it is a profound cultural severance, a turning away from centuries of accumulated wisdom, artistic expression, and lived experience that tether textured hair to identity and resilience.
To truly honor the Soul of a Strand, we must recognize that every coil, every curl, holds a lineage, a story of survival, artistry, and self-possession. The evolving landscape, marked by legislative changes and a rising tide of collective consciousness, signals a gentle turning. It suggests a recognition that the past, with its biases and exclusions, cannot dictate the entirety of our present or shape the promise of our future. The work of pioneers, the resilience of communities, and the inherent beauty of diverse textures all converge now, demanding a fuller, more truthful account of hair in all its forms.
This awakening calls for a renewed commitment to comprehensive, heritage-informed education, ensuring that no strand is ever left unheard, and every artist is equipped to serve the full spectrum of human crowning glory. The living library of hair traditions, vibrant and ever-unfolding, awaits its rightful place in every salon, every school, and every heart that understands beauty beyond narrow confines.

References
- Byrd, A. & Tharps, L. (2014). Hair Story ❉ Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America. St. Martin’s Press.
- Mbilishaka, A. (2018a). PsychoHairapy ❉ The psychology of Black hair and mental health in hair care settings. Journal of Black Psychology.
- Rosado, R. (2003). The grammar of hair ❉ Hair as communication in the African diaspora. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida.
- Rooks, N. M. (1996). Hair Raising ❉ Beauty, Culture, and African American Women. Rutgers University Press.
- Sherrow, V. (2006). Encyclopedia of Hair ❉ A Cultural History. Greenwood Press.
- Jacobs-Huey, L. (2006). From the kitchen to the salon ❉ Transnationalism and the “natural hair” movement. American Anthropologist.
- Mercer, K. (1994). Welcome to the jungle ❉ Identity and difference in the postmodern politics of race. Routledge.
- Mangum, D. & Woods, D. (2011). Black hair ❉ The politics and psychology of hair. Journal of Counseling Psychology.
- Byrd, A. & Tharps, L. (2001). Hair story ❉ Untangling the roots of black hair in America. St. Martin’s Press.
- Patton, T. O. (2006). Hey girl, am I more than my hair? African American women and their struggles with beauty, body image, and hair. In Communication and cultural identity. Routledge.