When did bias against textured hair begin?

Roots

For those who carry the legacy of textured hair, the query “When did bias against textured hair begin?” does not arrive as a mere academic exercise. It lands with the quiet weight of lived experience, a question often whispered in moments of reflection or shouted in acts of defiance. It is a query that beckons us to look beyond superficial appearances, to the very origins of our strands, and to the ancestral lands from which our unique hair patterns emerged.

To understand the genesis of this bias, we must first recognize the deep reverence and multifaceted significance textured hair held long before it became a point of contention. It is a journey into the heart of heritage, where hair was not simply an adornment, but a profound cultural archive.

Hair Anatomy and Physiology Specific to Textured Hair

At its elemental core, textured hair, particularly coily and kinky patterns, presents distinct biological characteristics. Unlike straight hair, which typically grows from round follicles, highly coiled hair emerges from elliptical or flattened follicles. This unique follicular shape dictates the hair strand’s curvature, leading to its characteristic spirals, zig-zags, and coils. The hair shaft itself often varies in thickness along its length and possesses more cuticle layers, which can lift at the bends, making it more susceptible to moisture loss and breakage if not tended with understanding.

This inherent structure, a marvel of biological adaptation, was once celebrated for its resilience and unique aesthetic. Evolutionary biologists theorize that tightly coiled hair served as an adaptation in early hominids, providing protection from intense sun exposure and aiding in scalp cooling by allowing air circulation.

Understanding the fundamental biology of textured hair reveals a design suited to specific environments, a testament to nature’s wisdom. The bias that arose later was not rooted in any biological deficiency, but in a systemic reinterpretation of these natural attributes through a lens of subjugation. The physical characteristics that once offered ancestral protection became targets for dehumanization, a stark contrast to their original purpose. The very structure that allowed for intricate styles and communication became a marker for perceived inferiority, a profound shift in perception that would echo through centuries.

Textured Hair Classification Systems and Their Cultural Origins

The contemporary hair typing systems, like the Andre Walker chart (1A-4C), while seemingly benign tools for product recommendations, carry a complex and often troubling lineage. While Walker’s system categorizes hair into straight, wavy, curly, and coily types with subcategories, its historical precursors were far from neutral. The very concept of classifying hair based on its curl pattern has roots in the early 20th century, notably with Eugen Fischer, a German scientist and eugenicist.

Fischer developed a “hair gauge” in 1908 to determine the “proximity to whiteness” of Namibians based on their hair texture. This pseudoscientific endeavor was deeply intertwined with racist ideologies and the subjugation of indigenous populations during a period of genocide in Namibia.

The historical roots of hair classification systems are intertwined with pseudoscientific attempts to justify racial hierarchies.

The “good hair” versus “bad hair” dichotomy, which became prevalent during and after slavery, further cemented this biased classification. “Good hair” often referred to straighter, looser curl patterns, perceived as closer to European hair, while “bad hair” described tightly coiled, kinky textures. This internal division within Black communities, known as texturism, remains a legacy of these imposed standards, where hair textures closer to white are still sometimes viewed as more acceptable.

The Essential Lexicon of Textured Hair

The language used to describe textured hair has often been weaponized, stripping it of its inherent beauty and cultural significance. Terms like “nappy” or “wooly,” once used as racial slurs, served to dehumanize Black individuals and compare their hair to animal fleece. These terms contributed to a pervasive narrative that natural Black hair was unruly, unprofessional, or unclean.

Yet, within the communities themselves, a rich and respectful lexicon existed, rooted in ancestral practices and the nuanced understanding of diverse hair patterns. These were terms of affection, of description, and of cultural belonging, a stark contrast to the derogatory labels imposed from outside.

The reclaiming of terms and the creation of new, affirming language has been a powerful act of resistance, shifting the narrative from one of imposed shame to one of inherited pride. This linguistic reclamation is a vital part of honoring the heritage of textured hair, recognizing that words hold power, shaping both perception and self-worth.

Hair Growth Cycles and Influencing Factors

The growth cycle of textured hair, like all hair, follows distinct phases ❉ anagen (growth), catagen (transition), and telogen (resting). However, the unique structure of coiled hair can sometimes lead to challenges in length retention due to breakage at the fragile bends of the hair shaft. Ancestral practices, developed over millennia, instinctively addressed these concerns. Traditional care often prioritized moisture retention and protective styling, reflecting an intuitive understanding of the hair’s needs long before modern scientific explanations.

Historical environmental and nutritional factors also played a part, with diets rich in essential nutrients supporting robust hair growth. The wisdom embedded in these practices speaks to a deep connection with the body and the environment, a holistic approach to wellness that extended to hair care.

Ritual

Stepping into the realm of ritual, we begin to comprehend how the bias against textured hair did not simply appear, but rather solidified through the erosion of established cultural practices and the imposition of foreign ideals. It is here, in the tender care and communal bonds woven around hair, that we witness the deliberate dismantling of a heritage, forcing a shift in how Black and mixed-race individuals related to their strands. The story of bias is not just one of outward judgment, but of an internal struggle born from the systematic disruption of ancestral wisdom.

Protective Styling Encyclopedia and Its Ancestral Roots

Protective styling, a cornerstone of textured hair care today, holds a profound ancestral lineage. Styles such as Braids, Cornrows, and Locs were not merely aesthetic choices in pre-colonial African societies; they were intricate forms of communication, identity markers, and even tools for survival. Hairstyles conveyed a person’s age, marital status, tribal affiliation, social rank, wealth, and spiritual beliefs. For example, the Yoruba people of Nigeria crafted elaborate styles to symbolize community roles, and Maasai people in East Africa held specific beliefs about hair and spiritual energy.

During the transatlantic slave trade, these traditions were violently suppressed. Slave owners often shaved the heads of enslaved Africans in an attempt to erase their cultural identity and sever their connection to their homeland. Despite this brutal dehumanization, some practices persisted as quiet acts of resistance.

Enslaved African women, particularly rice farmers, braided rice seeds into their hair for survival. Cornrows were also used to create maps for escape, demonstrating hair’s enduring role as a medium of communication and resistance.

Protective styles, deeply rooted in African heritage, transformed from markers of identity into symbols of resistance under oppression.

The bias against textured hair began, in part, with this deliberate erasure of its cultural significance. When ancestral practices were deemed “savage” or “unclean” by colonizers, the very act of wearing one’s hair in its natural state became a political statement, rather than a natural expression of heritage.

• Cornrows ❉ Tracing back 5000 years to 3500 BC in African culture, these intricate braids close to the scalp served as communication mediums among various African societies.
• Locs ❉ Ancient Egyptian royalty, regardless of gender, wore dreadlocks or wigs with braids and elaborate coiffures, signifying status and spirituality.
• Hair Wraps ❉ In African villages, different prints and colors of hair wraps symbolized a person’s tribe or social status, also offering protection.

Natural Styling and Definition Techniques

Before the widespread imposition of Eurocentric beauty standards, natural styling techniques were diverse and varied across African communities. These methods, passed down through generations, focused on enhancing the hair’s inherent qualities, often utilizing natural ingredients readily available in the environment. The emphasis was on health, communal bonding, and the expression of identity. The idea that textured hair needed to be “tamed” or “straightened” is a construct that arose from a colonial mindset, which viewed African features as inferior.

This historical context reveals that the desire for “definition” in textured hair, as understood today, has been shaped by both internal cultural preferences and external pressures to conform to ideals that did not originate within Black communities. The techniques of shaping coils and curls were always present, but their perceived “acceptability” shifted dramatically with the advent of racialized beauty standards.

Wigs and Hair Extensions Mastery

The use of wigs and hair extensions also possesses a deep and complex history within textured hair heritage, far predating modern fashion trends. In ancient Egypt, both men and women of the elite class wore elaborate wigs made from human hair, wool, and plant fibers, often adorned with gold and beads, symbolizing wealth and religious devotion. This historical context contrasts sharply with the later motivations for using extensions, which, during and after slavery, often shifted towards emulating European hairstyles as a means of assimilation or to avoid discrimination.

The journey of wigs and extensions, from symbols of power and spiritual connection to tools of conformity, highlights a profound cultural transformation influenced by external pressures. This shift reflects a period where the authentic expression of textured hair was penalized, leading to adaptive practices for survival and social acceptance.

Heat Styling and Thermal Reconditioning

The introduction of heat styling and chemical relaxers marks a significant turning point in the history of textured hair care and the pervasive nature of bias. While early methods of temporary straightening, such as hot combs popularized by Madam C.J. Walker in the 19th century, offered a way to align with societal beauty standards, they also represented a departure from traditional, chemical-free practices. The rise of chemical relaxers in the 20th century provided longer-lasting results but often at the cost of scalp damage and hair breakage.

This widespread adoption of straightening methods was a direct consequence of Eurocentric beauty standards, which deemed natural textured hair unprofessional or unkempt in schools and workplaces. The pressure to conform was immense, leading many Black women to chemically alter their hair to secure economic opportunities and social acceptance. This period clearly illustrates how bias became deeply embedded in daily practices, influencing not only aesthetic choices but also health outcomes and economic mobility.

The Complete Textured Hair Toolkit

The tools used for textured hair care have evolved from ancestral implements to modern innovations, each reflecting the prevailing understanding and treatment of these unique strands. In ancient Africa, intricate hair styling involved not only washing and oiling but also the use of specialized combs, often crafted from wood or bone, and adornments like beads, shells, and ivory. These tools were part of a communal ritual, a social opportunity to bond with family and friends.

The absence of these traditional tools and methods during slavery forced enslaved Africans to improvise, using rudimentary items like livestock combs and substances like butter or kerosene to care for their hair. This period marked a profound disconnect from ancestral practices and a reliance on whatever was available, highlighting the ingenuity born from adversity. Today’s toolkit, while incorporating modern advancements, can also draw inspiration from these historical roots, recognizing the enduring wisdom in tools designed to respect the hair’s natural structure.

Relay

How does the historical echo of bias continue to shape the very fiber of textured hair experiences, influencing not just our outward appearance, but our inner sense of self and our collective ancestral memory? This section seeks to unravel the complex interplay of biological realities, societal pressures, and enduring heritage that informs our understanding of textured hair today, moving beyond surface-level observations to a deeper comprehension of its profound cultural and historical weight.

Building Personalized Textured Hair Regimens

The creation of a personalized textured hair regimen today, while often guided by modern science, can draw deeply from ancestral wisdom. Historically, hair care routines in African communities were rooted in natural ingredients like shea butter, coconut oil, and aloe vera, prioritizing moisture and scalp health. These traditional remedies, passed down through generations, demonstrate an intuitive understanding of the hair’s needs for hydration and nourishment. The concept of “greasing” the hair, a tradition of applying natural products to the scalp and strands, has been sustained across Black families, reflecting a continuous lineage of care.

The bias against textured hair, however, disrupted these established practices. The notion that textured hair was inherently “unmanageable” or “difficult” led to a reliance on harsh chemicals and products designed to alter its natural state, often causing damage. A personalized regimen today, therefore, becomes an act of reclaiming autonomy and aligning with a heritage of holistic care, choosing practices that honor the hair’s natural structure and ancestral needs.

• Shea Butter ❉ Widely used in traditional African hair care for its moisturizing and protective qualities, passed down through generations.
• Coconut Oil ❉ An essential oil recognized in ancestral practices and modern understanding for its high moisture content and ability to combat physiological stress.
• Aloe Vera ❉ Employed traditionally for scalp health and soothing properties, reflecting a long-standing knowledge of natural remedies.

The Nighttime Sanctuary ❉ Essential Sleep Protection and Bonnet Wisdom

The practice of protecting textured hair during sleep, particularly with bonnets or wraps, is not merely a modern convenience; it is a continuation of practices deeply rooted in ancestral wisdom. Hair wrapping, a tradition passed down in certain African communities, served not only to symbolize tribe or status but also to keep hair healthy and avoid damage. This understanding of hair as a precious, delicate aspect of the self, requiring deliberate protection, stands in stark contrast to the devaluation of textured hair that emerged with colonial influence.

The widespread adoption of bonnets and silk scarves today reflects a collective re-engagement with this ancestral knowledge, recognizing the importance of preserving moisture and preventing friction-induced breakage. This seemingly simple ritual speaks volumes about the enduring heritage of care and the collective effort to counteract centuries of bias that sought to diminish the intrinsic value of textured hair.

Ingredient Deep Dives for Textured Hair Needs

The effectiveness of traditional ingredients in textured hair care, long understood through ancestral knowledge, is increasingly validated by modern scientific inquiry. While some contemporary discussions about raw oils and butters have arisen, many African communities have used such ingredients for thousands of years with optimal results. The Himba tribe of Namibia, for example, coats their hair in red clay, and the Basara Tribe of T’Chad uses an herb-infused oil and animal fat mixture (Chebe) for length retention.

The bias against textured hair often dismissed these traditional practices as unsophisticated or unscientific, favoring chemically-laden products designed to straighten or alter the hair. This disregard for ancestral wisdom not only perpetuated harmful narratives but also overlooked effective, natural solutions. A deeper understanding of these ingredients, from both a heritage and scientific perspective, reveals a continuity of knowledge that transcends colonial interruptions.

Textured Hair Problem Solving Compendium

Addressing challenges related to textured hair today necessitates a dual lens, integrating modern dermatological understanding with the wisdom gleaned from ancestral practices. Historically, certain hair and scalp disorders disproportionately affect Black women, a reality often exacerbated by the use of harsh chemical treatments in an attempt to conform to Eurocentric beauty standards. The “good hair” narrative, which favored straighter textures, pushed many towards damaging practices that ultimately compromised hair health.

The bias against textured hair, therefore, did not only manifest as social discrimination but also contributed to physical harm. Solutions to common textured hair problems, such as dryness or breakage, are often found in returning to the moisture-retaining practices and natural ingredients that were central to ancestral care. This holistic approach to problem-solving acknowledges the historical context of hair health and seeks to repair the damage inflicted by centuries of imposed beauty ideals.

Holistic Influences on Hair Health

The holistic approach to hair health, deeply embedded in ancestral wellness philosophies, extends beyond topical treatments to encompass overall well-being. In many ancient African cultures, hair was seen as a sacred part of the body, connected to spiritual energy and the divine. This belief meant that hair care was not just a physical act but a communal and spiritual ritual, a time for bonding and connection.

The bias against textured hair, by attacking this sacred aspect of identity, disrupted not only physical care practices but also the spiritual and communal dimensions of hair. The act of maintaining healthy textured hair today, therefore, becomes a reaffirmation of this holistic heritage, recognizing the interconnectedness of physical, mental, and spiritual well-being. The enduring legacy of this bias is the ongoing need to consciously reconnect with these ancestral philosophies, restoring hair care to its rightful place as a vital aspect of holistic self-care and cultural affirmation.

A study conducted by Dove in the UK found that half of Black and mixed women with afro textured hair have faced discrimination because of their hair. This statistic powerfully illuminates the enduring impact of historical bias, demonstrating that the perception of textured hair as “unprofessional” or “unattractive” continues to affect Black and mixed-race individuals in contemporary society. The bias, therefore, is not a relic of the past but a living reality that shapes experiences in schools, workplaces, and daily interactions.

Reflection

The journey to understand when bias against textured hair began is not a linear path, but a winding river, its currents shaped by centuries of cultural exchange, power dynamics, and the enduring spirit of heritage. It reveals that the devaluation of textured hair was not an inherent truth, but a constructed narrative, born from colonial agendas and perpetuated through systems of oppression. Yet, within this history of struggle lies a profound resilience, a continuous thread of ancestral wisdom that reminds us that our hair is a living archive, holding stories of identity, community, and unyielding beauty. To care for textured hair today is to honor this legacy, to consciously choose reverence over judgment, and to allow each strand to speak its own truth, unbound and celebrated.

References

• Byrd, A. & Tharps, L. L. (2001). Hair Story ❉ Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America. St. Martin’s Press.
• Collins, P. H. (2004). Black Sexual Politics ❉ African Americans and the New Racism in the Twenty-First Century. Routledge.
• Fischer, E. (1908). Rassenanatomie der Namas. Gustav Fischer.
• Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural Violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291-305.
• Hrdy, D. (1973). Quantitative analysis of the shape of hair curl. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 39(1), 7-14.
• Oyedemi, T. (2016). ‘Beautiful’ hair and the cultural violence of identity erasure. African Identities, 14(3), 227-241.
• Robinson, C. (2011). Hair Story ❉ Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America. St. Martin’s Press.
• White, C. (1799). An Account of the Regular Gradation in Man, and in Different Animals and Vegetables; and from the Former to the Latter. C. Dilly.