# What Legal Measures Protect Textured Hair in Professional Settings? ❉ Question

**Published:** 2025-06-10
**Author:** Roothea
**Categories:** Question

---

_
![This dramatic portrait honors ancestral heritage through avant-garde Fulani braiding artistry, showcasing the interplay of light and shadow on intricate textured hair forms, the design celebrates Black expressive styling while promoting holistic hair care, reflecting cultural pride in low porosity high-density coils and traditional hair practices.](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/avant-garde-braided-crown-a-celebration-of-black-textured-hair-artistry.jpg)

## Roots

Consider, for a moment, the hair that crowns the head, not as a mere biological filament, but as a living archive, a profound connection to generations past. For people of African descent, particularly Black and mixed-race individuals, hair is not just hair. It is a lineage. It is a symbol of artistry, resilience, and belonging.

Yet, for far too long, the professional world, shaped by narrow, Eurocentric ideals of “neatness” and “professionalism,” has sought to unravel this vital connection, imposing standards that forced individuals to sever ties with their authentic, inherited selves. The very structure of textured hair ❉ its unique growth patterns, its spirals, its coiling strength ❉ became, paradoxically, a point of contention, an unwitting trigger for discrimination in places where competence and skill should reign supreme.

> The legal measures protecting textured hair are a modern response to deeply entrenched historical biases that sought to diminish the cultural value and inherent beauty of Black and mixed-race hair.
The need for legal intervention stems directly from a historical context where ancestral hair patterns and styles were often deemed unacceptable within formal environments. This societal prejudice, rooted in systemic biases, resulted in Black individuals being denied opportunities, disciplined, or even terminated simply for wearing their hair in its natural state or in styles deeply associated with their cultural lineage. It is a historical wound, prompting a contemporary demand for recognition and protection. 

![The monochrome depiction of a woman drawing water highlights the symbolic nature of purity and renewal, mirroring the care practices rooted in traditions of holistic textured hair care for vibrant coils. The act evokes connection to natural elements and ancestral heritage within wellness and expressive styling](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/woman-with-two-toned-locs-draws-water-from-ancient-forest-spring.jpg)

## Hair’s Elemental Ancestry and Societal Scrutiny

The varied textures of hair across African descendants, from the kinky curls of the Mandingos to the looser waves of the Ashanti, each carried distinct meanings and spiritual power in ancestral societies. Hair was a physical expression of identity: marital status, age, religion, ethnic identity, wealth, and communal rank were often conveyed through its styling. This sacred and communicative aspect was starkly disregarded during the transatlantic slave trade, where the forced shaving of heads served as a profound dehumanizing act, a deliberate severing of identity and a connection to home. This act of stripping identity laid a dark foundation for future attitudes toward Black hair. 

Over centuries, this legacy of dehumanization manifested in societal pressures that equated straightened hair with acceptance and opportunity. Madam C.J. Walker’s innovations, while empowering [Black women](/area/black-women/) with self-care tools, simultaneously reflected the pervasive drive to conform to a Eurocentric vision of beauty.

The Black Is Beautiful movement of the 1960s, with icons like Angela Davis sporting the Afro, boldly reclaimed [natural hair](/area/natural-hair/) as a symbol of power and resistance, challenging the enforced aesthetics of conformity. However, this powerful reclamation also brought increased scrutiny and punishment within workplaces and schools, underscoring the persistent need for codified protections.

![Captured in stark monochrome, this portrait celebrates a woman’s style, featuring her textured hair and distinct shaved designs, juxtaposed with her professional attire, echoing themes of identity, heritage, and self-expression through unique natural hair formations in an urban setting, highlighting her holistic commitment.](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/stylish-african-american-woman-with-tapered-haircut-and-professional-attire.jpg)

## What Historical Prejudices Necessitated Legal Action?

The journey to [legal protection](/area/legal-protection/) for [textured hair](/area/textured-hair/) reveals a pattern of persistent discrimination. Before explicit laws like the CROWN Act, individuals often sought recourse under Title VII of the [Civil Rights](/area/civil-rights/) Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race. Yet, the courts’ interpretations were not always clear. Early cases struggled with the distinction between immutable characteristics (like skin color) and mutable characteristics (like hairstyles), sometimes ruling that hair styles were a “choice” and thus not protected as racial discrimination. 

A powerful historical example of this struggle is the 1981 case of <i>Rogers v. American Airlines_. In this case, a federal district court upheld American Airlines’ grooming policy, which prohibited employees in certain positions from wearing all-braided hairstyles. The court concluded that hairstyles, even those “socioculturally associated with a particular nationality,” were an “artifice” and not a product of “natural hair growth,” thus not protected under federal law.

This ruling granted corporations the right to ban braided hairstyles in the workplace, setting a precedent that disregarded the deep cultural and historical significance of such styles for Black women. This deeply flawed interpretation highlighted the gaping hole in existing civil rights law, leaving millions vulnerable to workplace policies that reinforced a single, narrow standard of beauty and professionalism, a standard often unattainable for Black individuals without chemical or physical alteration of their hair.

This historical backdrop of legally sanctioned discrimination, despite Title VII’s existence, illuminated the clear and pressing need for specific measures that unequivocally state that discrimination based on [hair texture](/area/hair-texture/) and protective styles is, in fact, racial discrimination. It was a direct response to the lingering shadows of colonial aesthetics and the enduring fight for autonomy over one’s own identity. 

_
![The monochrome portrait highlights textured hair](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/striking-portrait-of-woman-adorned-with-intricate-braided-hairstyle-and.jpg)

## Ritual

The act of styling textured hair is often a sacred ritual, a legacy passed down through generations. From the meticulous parting of cornrows to the patient twisting of locs, these are not mere cosmetic choices. They are practices steeped in the heritage of survival, creativity, and communal connection.

Yet, for too long, these ancestral expressions were met with hostility in professional spaces. Legal measures protecting textured hair seek to reframe the understanding of professionalism, creating avenues where these vital rituals of self-expression can exist without penalty.

> The CROWN Act stands as a beacon for cultural reverence, codifying protections for hairstyles with deep ancestral roots.
The CROWN Act, an acronym for “Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair,” directly confronts these historical biases by expanding the definition of race in anti-discrimination laws to include hair texture and protective hairstyles. This legislation acknowledges that [hair discrimination](/area/hair-discrimination/) is a form of racial discrimination, a truth long understood within Black and mixed-race communities but often overlooked by the legal system. It represents a collective breath, a recognition that the beauty of our heritage should not be a barrier to opportunity. 

![Sunlight catches the halo of textured hair as a mother gently tends to her mixed-race child’s hair this nurturing act honors ancestral heritage and a commitment to the specialized care routines vital for strong, healthy, type 3C/4A curl formation, reflecting deep cultural and familial connection.](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/mother-combing-natural-textured-hair-of-mixed-race-child-outdoors-sunlight.jpg)

## How Did Ancestral Practices Shape the Demand for Legal Protection?

Across various African societies, hair styling was a significant aspect of social life, identity, and spirituality. 

- **Cornrows** ❉ Ancient origins, often depicting social status, age, or tribal affiliation. During the transatlantic slave trade, enslaved Africans used cornrows to create maps to freedom or to conceal rice grains for sustenance. This historical ingenuity and deep cultural meaning were later dismissed as “unprofessional” in modern workplaces.

- **Locs** ❉ Symbolizing spiritual connection and a rejection of Eurocentric beauty standards, locs have been worn for millennia across diverse African and Indigenous cultures. Their natural formation, often seen as untamed, became a target for discrimination, forcing individuals to alter their hair to conform.

- **Braids and Twists** ❉ Beyond aesthetics, these styles protected hair from environmental elements and facilitated maintenance, essential for demanding daily life in traditional African communities. They also served as a means of communication, indicating marital status, fertility, or rank. The imposition of “straight hair” policies often meant damaging chemical treatments or time-consuming alterations, hindering the practical and cultural value of these styles.
The constant demand to alter hair for “professional” appearance has imposed significant burdens, both financial and physical, on Black women. It frequently involves harsh chemicals that can cause scalp damage and hair breakage, or repetitive heat styling that weakens the hair strand. These practices are far removed from ancestral care traditions that prioritized the preservation and health of textured hair. The persistent negative perceptions of natural hair in workplaces, even leading to microaggressions or job denials, highlight the urgent call for legal measures that affirm the right to wear one’s hair authentically. 

![Radiant smiles reflect connection as textured hair is meticulously braided affirming cultural heritage, community and the art of expressive styling. This moment underscores the deep rooted tradition of Black hair care as self care, celebrating identity and skilled artistry in textured hair formation for wellness](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/women-braiding-textured-hair-black-hair-traditions-expressive-styling-portrait.jpg)

## What Specific Hair Styles Are Now Protected?

The CROWN Act, through its various state and municipal adoptions, explicitly extends protection to a range of natural hair textures and culturally significant styles. 

California was the first state to enact the [CROWN Act](/area/crown-act/) in 2019. Since then, over two dozen states and numerous localities have followed suit, recognizing that policies prohibiting these styles disproportionately affect Black individuals. This legal shift signifies a collective movement to dismantle discriminatory appearance policies and to redefine “professionalism” to include, rather than exclude, the natural expressions of Black and mixed-race heritage. It underscores a commitment to fostering environments where one’s cultural identity, as expressed through hair, is a source of strength, not a target for suppression. 

![Elegant in monochrome, the portrait celebrates the beauty and strength embodied within afro textured hair, a coil crown, and classic style. The image is an ode to heritage, resilience, and the power of self-expression through textured hair forms, deeply rooted in Black hair traditions and ancestral pride](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/monochrome-portrait-of-a-woman-with-afro-textured-hair-and-classic-dress.jpg)

![The act of braiding transforms into a resonant moment, weaving together ancestral knowledge, intergenerational bonds, and the meticulous artistry of textured haircare. This tender exchange underscores the beauty of Black hair traditions, affirming cultural pride and holistic wellness through intimate connection](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/mother-braiding-daughters-coiled-hair-sunlight-textured-haircare-bonding.jpg)

## Relay

The legislative journey protecting textured hair in [professional settings](/area/professional-settings/) is a complex relay, passing the baton from the broad strokes of civil rights legislation to the specific, nuanced protections of modern acts. It is a story of legal adaptation, of laws catching up to lived experience, and of a persistent cultural effort to affirm the right to ancestral expression. Understanding what legal measures protect textured hair means delving into the interplay of existing federal statutes and newly enacted state laws, recognizing how each piece contributes to a more complete shield for those who carry the heritage of textured hair. 

> Current legal frameworks for textured hair protection represent a legislative evolution, clarifying that hair discrimination is indeed racial discrimination.
For decades, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 stood as the primary federal safeguard against race-based employment discrimination. While this foundational law prohibits discrimination based on skin color and hair texture, its application to hairstyles, particularly those associated with Black culture, has been a battleground. Courts frequently made a distinction between immutable characteristics, which were protected, and mutable characteristics, like hairstyles, which were often not, leading to inconsistent rulings and leaving many vulnerable. This narrow interpretation created a loophole, allowing employers to enforce appearance policies that disproportionately affected Black employees under the guise of “professionalism”. 

![The image celebrates cultural richness and beauty practices. The woman embodies self-expression through her natural hair texture and adornments](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/striking-portrait-of-a-woman-with-exquisite-crown-of-textured-coils.jpg)

## How Does Federal Law Address Hair Discrimination?

While a federal CROWN Act has passed the House of Representatives multiple times, it has not yet been signed into law at the national level. This means that federal protection specifically prohibiting hair discrimination based on texture or style remains indirect, relying on the broader interpretations of Title VII by courts and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). 

The EEOC, tasked with enforcing federal anti-discrimination laws, has provided some guidance. Its Compliance Manual on Race and Color Discrimination states that discrimination based on physical characteristics associated with race, including hair texture, violates Title VII. However, as the <i>Catastrophe Management Solutions_ case in 2017 showed, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that “banning dreadlocks in the workplace under a race-neutral grooming policy ❉ without more ❉ does not constitute intentional race-based discrimination”. This decision underscored the limitations of existing federal law and highlighted the ongoing struggle for comprehensive protection. 

The push for a federal CROWN Act (H.R. 8191 / S. 4224), reintroduced by Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman and Sen.

Cory Booker, seeks to explicitly classify hair discrimination as illegal under federal law, applying to employment, housing, public accommodations, and federally assisted programs. This proposed legislation aims to provide a clear, unified standard, ensuring that individuals nationwide are protected regardless of their state’s specific laws. The necessity of this federal clarity speaks to the deep, historical context of hair policing that has affected Black Americans for centuries.

_## How Do State Laws Bolster These Protections?

The significant progress in [legal protections](/area/legal-protections/) for textured hair has come through state-level initiatives, primarily through the adoption of various versions of the CROWN Act. California was the first to act in 2019, and as of late 2024, over two dozen states have enacted similar legislation. These [state laws](/area/state-laws/) are crucial because they directly address the “loophole” in earlier interpretations of Title VII. 

These state CROWN Acts typically:

- **Expand the definition of “race”** ❉ They clarify that racial discrimination includes discrimination based on hair texture and hairstyles historically associated with race. This specifically covers styles like **braids**, **locs**, **twists**, **Afros**, and **Bantu knots**.

- **Prohibit discriminatory grooming policies** ❉ They make it illegal for employers and schools to enforce dress codes or grooming policies that disproportionately impact people of color based on their hair.

- **Affirm cultural expression** ❉ They legally validate the right to wear one’s natural hair and traditional styles without facing professional or educational disadvantages, grounding this right in civil rights and cultural heritage.
The legislative momentum behind the CROWN Act reflects a broader societal recognition of hair discrimination as a genuine form of racial injustice. For instance, a 2023 study found that Black women’s hair is 2.5 times as likely as white women’s hair to be perceived as “unprofessional,” and approximately two-thirds of Black women alter their hair for job interviews. Over 20% of Black women between 25 ❉ 34 have even been sent home from their jobs due to their hair.

These stark figures underscore the persistent impact of [Eurocentric beauty standards](/area/eurocentric-beauty-standards/) and the urgent need for comprehensive legal remedies that respect [ancestral practices](/area/ancestral-practices/) and identity. The legal landscape for [textured hair protection](/area/textured-hair-protection/) is thus a powerful testament to the ongoing fight for equity, a relay race where each legislative stride builds upon past struggles, ultimately aiming to ensure that no one’s heritage becomes a barrier to their professional calling.

![This evocative portrait celebrates textured hair through a complex crown braid. It symbolizes cultural artistry, embracing heritage](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/monochrome-portrait-woman-crown-braid-hairstyle-textured-hair-cultural-heritage.jpg)

![Bathed in light and shadow, the woman](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/monochrome-portrait-of-woman-with-braided-coils-and-sunlight-shadows.jpg)

## Reflection

To consider the legal measures protecting textured hair in professional settings is to stand at the confluence of deeply personal heritage and societal justice. It is to acknowledge that the spiral of a single strand, the intricate artistry of a braid, or the liberating expanse of an Afro, carries the weight of history, the whispers of ancestors, and the vibrant pulse of living culture. These legal frameworks, like the CROWN Act, are not simply bureaucratic dictates; they are acknowledgments of a truth long held within communities that hair is more than appearance. It is identity, a connection to the source of being, a continuous thread of shared experience. 

As the world continues to awaken to the breadth of human experience, these protections serve as guideposts, reminding us that true professionalism stems from competence and character, not from a narrow, exclusionary vision of aesthetics. The path forward involves not only the passage of more laws but a collective shift in understanding, a profound appreciation for the diverse ways beauty and self find expression. This movement, rooted in the enduring spirit of textured hair, moves toward a future where every strand, in its natural glory, is celebrated, respected, and free to reach its fullest potential, carrying its ancient wisdom into modern spaces. It is a legacy continuously written, one braid, one coil, one freedom-affirming law at a time. 

![The image conveys a moment of intimate care, as hands apply a rich moisturizer to tightly coiled hair, celebrating the beauty and strength of Black hair traditions and holistic care. This act embodies cultural identity, ancestral connection, and wellness for expressive styling, nourishing the hair](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/nourishing-textured-hair-deep-moisture-treatment-application-black-and-white.jpg)

![The striking black and white portrait emphasizes the elegance of cornrow braids and the power of professional attire, reflecting a fusion of heritage and contemporary poise. The image captures the beauty of textured hair artistry, celebrating ancestral traditions intertwined with modern sophistication and expressive styling](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/elegant-portrait-of-a-black-woman-featuring-cornrow-braids-and-structured-suit.jpg)

## References

- Byrd, Ayana, and Lori Tharps. <i>Hair Story: Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America_. St. Martin’s Press, 2001.

- Dabiri, Emma. _Twisted: The Tangled History of Black Hair Culture_. Harper Perennial, 2020.

- Greene, D. Wendy. “Title VII: What’s Hair (and Other Race-Based Characteristics) Got to Do With it?” _George Mason Law Review_ 18, no. 3 (2011): 695-752.

- Greene, D. Wendy. “Splitting Hairs: The Eleventh Circuit’s Take on Workplace Bans Against Black Women’s Natural Hair in EEOC v. Catastrophe Management Solutions.” _University of Miami Law Review_ 71 (2017): 987.

- Onwuachi-Willig, Angela. “Another Hair Piece: Exploring New Strands of Analysis Under Title VII.” _Georgetown Law Journal_ 98 (2010): 1079.

- Duke, Angela, and Katie R. Dover. “The Natural Hair Bias in Job Recruitment.” _Social Psychological and Personality Science_ 12, no. 1 (2020): 120-128.

- Crenshaw, Kimberlé. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” _University of Chicago Legal Forum_ (1989): 139.

- Dove and LinkedIn. “2023 CROWN Research Study: The Economic Impact of Hair Discrimination on Black Women.” 2023.

- Byrd, Marilyn Y. and Chaunda L. Scott. _Diversity in the Workplace: Current Issues and Emerging Trends_. Praeger, 2014.

- Rollins, Kimberly. “Between a Loc and a Hard Place: A Socio-Historical, Legal, and Intersectional Analysis of Hair Discrimination and Title VII.” _University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class_ 21, no. 1 (2021): 215-244.

## Glossary

### [Professional Grooming Standards](https://roothea.co/area/professional-grooming-standards/)

Meaning ❉ Professional Grooming Standards, when applied to textured hair, signify a discerning approach to its inherent characteristics and significant cultural weight.

### [Legal Recognition](https://roothea.co/area/legal-recognition/)

Meaning ❉ Legal Recognition, within the gentle yet precise realm of textured hair understanding, marks the authoritative validation of its unique structural characteristics and the specific care methodologies it genuinely requires.

### [Textured Hair Protection](https://roothea.co/area/textured-hair-protection/)

Meaning ❉ Textured Hair Protection denotes the thoughtful, systematic approach to preserving the inherent structural integrity and moisture balance of coily, kinky, and wavy hair patterns, particularly those common in Black and mixed-race heritage.

### [Professional Settings](https://roothea.co/area/professional-settings/)

Meaning ❉ Professional Settings, within the sphere of textured hair understanding, refers to the deliberate consideration and adaptation of hair presentation for environments where specific decorum or functional requirements guide appearance.

### [Legal Protections](https://roothea.co/area/legal-protections/)

Meaning ❉ Legal protections, within the gentle scope of textured hair understanding, denote the established frameworks that safeguard an individual's choice to present their hair in its natural form or culturally significant styles, free from unwarranted challenge.

### [Professional Hair Bias](https://roothea.co/area/professional-hair-bias/)

Meaning ❉ Professional Hair Bias quietly shapes perceptions within the hair care landscape, particularly impacting the understanding and care of Black and mixed-race hair.

### [Legal Rulings Heritage](https://roothea.co/area/legal-rulings-heritage/)

Meaning ❉ The Legal Rulings Heritage quietly refers to the enduring influence of legal precedents and legislative acts that have shaped the collective perception and practical handling of textured hair, especially concerning Black and mixed-race hair types.

### [Legal Impact](https://roothea.co/area/legal-impact/)

Meaning ❉ Legal Impact, within the tender sphere of textured hair understanding, denotes the discernible consequences that legal frameworks, societal policies, and regulatory provisions exert upon how we perceive, tend to, and adorn our natural coils and curls.

### [Natural Hair](https://roothea.co/area/natural-hair/)

Meaning ❉ Natural Hair describes hair that maintains its original structural configuration, untouched by chemical processes like relaxers, texturizers, or permanent color that alter its natural coil, curl, or wave definition.

### [Legal Reform](https://roothea.co/area/legal-reform/)

Meaning ❉ "Legal Reform," within the gentle sphere of textured hair understanding, refers not to formal statutes, but to a significant, thoughtful recalibration of societal norms and personal approaches concerning Black and mixed-race hair.

## Explore Your Heritage

### [What Defines a Protective Hairstyle in the Context of Heritage and Legal Protection?](https://roothea.co/question/what-defines-a-protective-hairstyle-in-the-context-of-heritage-and-legal-protection/)
![The monochrome aesthetic highlights the inherent beauty and geometric design of the carefully crafted locs hairstyle, creating a powerful statement of personal expression and cultural identity. With precise makeup and a sharp eye, the image captures her unique look, embodying both strength and elegance.](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/elegant-woman-with-short-locs-hairstyle-and-defined-facial-features.jpg)

### [Do Current Legal Protections Truly Reflect the Cultural Value of Textured Hair?](https://roothea.co/question/do-current-legal-protections-truly-reflect-the-cultural-value-of-textured-hair/)
![Against a backdrop of tempestuous skies, the subject](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/monochrome-portrait-of-young-woman-with-dynamically-styled-textured-hair.jpg)

### [Can Traditional Hair Care Rituals Protect Modern Textured Hair?](https://roothea.co/question/can-traditional-hair-care-rituals-protect-modern-textured-hair/)
![Captured in monochrome, the hands carefully manage the child](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/gentle-hands-combing-through-childs-naturally-coiled-blonde-textured-hair.jpg)

### [How Have Legal Frameworks Aimed to Protect Textured Hair Heritage?](https://roothea.co/question/how-have-legal-frameworks-aimed-to-protect-textured-hair-heritage/)
![Illuminated by stark contrast, the portrait highlights the beauty of coiled texture. Her unwavering gaze, combined with the visual contrast, speaks to cultural narratives, empowerment and the celebration of ancestral black hair traditions while embracing mixed-race hair narratives and styles.](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/striking-black-and-white-portrait-revealing-strength-resilience-and-textured.jpg)

### [Can Ancient Hair Practices Inform Contemporary Legal Standards for Textured Hair?](https://roothea.co/question/can-ancient-hair-practices-inform-contemporary-legal-standards-for-textured-hair/)
![The intricate arrangement of textured citrus becomes a visual ode to the natural ingredients celebrated in ancestral hair rituals, reflecting a deep connection between the earth](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/textured-citrus-pattern-symbolic-of-natural-hair-health-and-heritage.jpg)

### [What Legal Changes Protect Textured Hair Heritage in Schools and Workplaces?](https://roothea.co/question/what-legal-changes-protect-textured-hair-heritage-in-schools-and-workplaces/)
![The act of braiding transforms into a resonant moment, weaving together ancestral knowledge, intergenerational bonds, and the meticulous artistry of textured haircare. This tender exchange underscores the beauty of Black hair traditions, affirming cultural pride and holistic wellness through intimate connection.](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/mother-braiding-daughters-coiled-hair-sunlight-textured-haircare-bonding.jpg)

### [Why Did Textured Hair Become a Legal Battlefield?](https://roothea.co/question/why-did-textured-hair-become-a-legal-battlefield/)
![The black and white treatment amplifies the subject’s strong features and distinctive coiled textured hair, celebrating Black hair traditions and modern self-expression through styling. Light and shadow define her gaze, inviting a connection and deeper contemplation on beauty and identity.](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/striking-black-and-white-portrait-of-woman-with-coiled-textured-hair.jpg)

### [Legal Rights](https://roothea.co/term/legal-rights/)
![Striking portrait captures the quiet beauty of a woman showcasing a stylish textured bob with braid accentuating the hairline. Through careful contrast of light and shadow, the image invokes feelings of contemplative grace, celebrating individual expression and textured hair as a medium for self discovery.](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/portrait-of-an-elegant-woman-with-braided-detail-textured-hair-bob.jpg)

### [How Do Legal Protections Support Textured Hair Heritage?](https://roothea.co/question/how-do-legal-protections-support-textured-hair-heritage/)
![The portrait captures the strength and grace of a Black woman, her distinct hair crafted into a culturally rich style of braided locs, enhanced by a simple hairpin her textured hair serves as a connection to identity, heritage, and expressive styling.](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/black-and-white-portrait-of-woman-with-braided-locs-and-hairpin.jpg)

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://roothea.co/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://roothea.co/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Legal Measures Protect Textured Hair in Professional Settings?",
            "item": "https://roothea.co/question/what-legal-measures-protect-textured-hair-in-professional-settings/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://roothea.co/question/what-legal-measures-protect-textured-hair-in-professional-settings/"
    },
    "headline": "What Legal Measures Protect Textured Hair in Professional Settings? ❉ Question",
    "description": "Legal measures, particularly the CROWN Act, protect textured hair in professional settings by affirming its intrinsic connection to racial and cultural identity. ❉ Question",
    "url": "https://roothea.co/question/what-legal-measures-protect-textured-hair-in-professional-settings/",
    "author": {
        "@type": "Person",
        "name": "Roothea",
        "url": "https://roothea.co/author/roothea/"
    },
    "datePublished": "2025-06-10T09:11:33+08:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-06-10T09:11:34+08:00",
    "publisher": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Roothea"
    },
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/elegant-portrait-of-a-black-woman-featuring-cornrow-braids-and-structured-suit.jpg",
        "caption": "The striking black and white portrait emphasizes the elegance of cornrow braids and the power of professional attire, reflecting a fusion of heritage and contemporary poise. The image captures the beauty of textured hair artistry, celebrating ancestral traditions intertwined with modern sophistication and expressive styling."
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Historical Prejudices Necessitated Legal Action?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "\nThe journey to legal protection for textured hair reveals a pattern of persistent discrimination. Before explicit laws like the CROWN Act, individuals often sought recourse under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race. Yet, the courts' interpretations were not always clear. Early cases struggled with the distinction between immutable characteristics (like skin color) and mutable characteristics (like hairstyles), sometimes ruling that hair styles were a \"choice\" and thus not protected as racial discrimination.\n"
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Did Ancestral Practices Shape the Demand for Legal Protection?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "\nAcross various African societies, hair styling was a significant aspect of social life, identity, and spirituality.\n"
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Specific Hair Styles Are Now Protected?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "\nThe CROWN Act, through its various state and municipal adoptions, explicitly extends protection to a range of natural hair textures and culturally significant styles.\n"
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Does Federal Law Address Hair Discrimination?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "\nWhile a federal CROWN Act has passed the House of Representatives multiple times, it has not yet been signed into law at the national level. This means that federal protection specifically prohibiting hair discrimination based on texture or style remains indirect, relying on the broader interpretations of Title VII by courts and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).\n"
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Do State Laws Bolster These Protections?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "\nThe significant progress in legal protections for textured hair has come through state-level initiatives, primarily through the adoption of various versions of the CROWN Act. California was the first to act in 2019, and as of late 2024, over two dozen states have enacted similar legislation. These state laws are crucial because they directly address the \"loophole\" in earlier interpretations of Title VII.\n"
            }
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebPage",
    "@id": "https://roothea.co/question/what-legal-measures-protect-textured-hair-in-professional-settings/",
    "mentions": [
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/black-women/",
            "name": "Black Women",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/black-women/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Black women, as central figures in textured hair understanding, gently guide the comprehension of coily and kinky strands."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/natural-hair/",
            "name": "Natural Hair",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/natural-hair/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Natural Hair describes hair that maintains its original structural configuration, untouched by chemical processes like relaxers, texturizers, or permanent color that alter its natural coil, curl, or wave definition."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/legal-protection/",
            "name": "Legal Protection",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/legal-protection/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Legal Protection, within the context of textured hair understanding, refers to the established frameworks that safeguard the cultural significance, historical practices, and personal autonomy surrounding Black and mixed-race hair."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/textured-hair/",
            "name": "Textured Hair",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/textured-hair/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Textured hair describes the natural hair structure characterized by its unique curl patterns, ranging from expansive waves to closely wound coils, a common trait across individuals of Black and mixed heritage."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/civil-rights/",
            "name": "Civil Rights",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/civil-rights/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Civil Rights, within the gentle landscape of textured hair understanding, points to the fundamental freedom and equal access allowing individuals with Black and mixed-race hair to define, care for, and present their unique hair identity without prejudice."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/hair-texture/",
            "name": "Hair Texture",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/hair-texture/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Hair Texture identifies the inherent physical configuration of individual hair strands, from gentle waves to tightly coiled patterns, a fundamental characteristic for those with Black and mixed heritage hair."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/hair-discrimination/",
            "name": "Hair Discrimination",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/hair-discrimination/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Hair Discrimination, a subtle yet impactful bias, refers to the differential and often unfavorable treatment of individuals based on the natural characteristics or chosen styles of their hair, especially those textures and forms historically worn by Black and mixed-race persons."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/crown-act/",
            "name": "CROWN Act",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/crown-act/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ The CROWN Act establishes legal protections against discrimination based on hair texture and styles frequently worn by individuals of Black or mixed heritage."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/professional-settings/",
            "name": "Professional Settings",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/professional-settings/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Professional Settings, within the sphere of textured hair understanding, refers to the deliberate consideration and adaptation of hair presentation for environments where specific decorum or functional requirements guide appearance."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/legal-protections/",
            "name": "Legal Protections",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/legal-protections/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Legal protections, within the gentle scope of textured hair understanding, denote the established frameworks that safeguard an individual's choice to present their hair in its natural form or culturally significant styles, free from unwarranted challenge."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/state-laws/",
            "name": "State Laws",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/state-laws/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ State Laws, within the delicate understanding of textured hair, refer not to formal decrees but to the gentle, consistent principles guiding our unique coils, kinks, and waves."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/eurocentric-beauty-standards/",
            "name": "Eurocentric Beauty Standards",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/eurocentric-beauty-standards/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Eurocentric beauty standards denote a historical leaning towards hair characteristics commonly found within European lineages, such as straightness, fineness, or gentle waves, alongside particular color and density ideals."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/textured-hair-protection/",
            "name": "Textured Hair Protection",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/textured-hair-protection/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Textured Hair Protection denotes the thoughtful, systematic approach to preserving the inherent structural integrity and moisture balance of coily, kinky, and wavy hair patterns, particularly those common in Black and mixed-race heritage."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/ancestral-practices/",
            "name": "Ancestral Practices",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/ancestral-practices/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Ancestral Practices, within the context of textured hair understanding, describe the enduring wisdom and gentle techniques passed down through generations, forming a foundational knowledge for nurturing Black and mixed-race hair."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/professional-grooming-standards/",
            "name": "Professional Grooming Standards",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/professional-grooming-standards/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Professional Grooming Standards, when applied to textured hair, signify a discerning approach to its inherent characteristics and significant cultural weight."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/legal-recognition/",
            "name": "Legal Recognition",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/legal-recognition/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Legal Recognition, within the gentle yet precise realm of textured hair understanding, marks the authoritative validation of its unique structural characteristics and the specific care methodologies it genuinely requires."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/professional-hair-bias/",
            "name": "Professional Hair Bias",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/professional-hair-bias/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Professional Hair Bias quietly shapes perceptions within the hair care landscape, particularly impacting the understanding and care of Black and mixed-race hair."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/legal-rulings-heritage/",
            "name": "Legal Rulings Heritage",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/legal-rulings-heritage/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ The Legal Rulings Heritage quietly refers to the enduring influence of legal precedents and legislative acts that have shaped the collective perception and practical handling of textured hair, especially concerning Black and mixed-race hair types."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/legal-impact/",
            "name": "Legal Impact",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/legal-impact/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Legal Impact, within the tender sphere of textured hair understanding, denotes the discernible consequences that legal frameworks, societal policies, and regulatory provisions exert upon how we perceive, tend to, and adorn our natural coils and curls."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/legal-reform/",
            "name": "Legal Reform",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/legal-reform/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ \"Legal Reform,\" within the gentle sphere of textured hair understanding, refers not to formal statutes, but to a significant, thoughtful recalibration of societal norms and personal approaches concerning Black and mixed-race hair."
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://roothea.co/question/what-legal-measures-protect-textured-hair-in-professional-settings/
