# What Historical Policies Suppressed Textured Hair Heritage? ❉ Question

**Published:** 2025-06-08
**Author:** Roothea
**Categories:** Question

---

![This evocative portrait features a woman whose braided hair, adorned with ribbons, and traditional embroidered dress speaks to a deep ancestral heritage. The image is an exploration of textured hair traditions and cultural expression reflecting identity and empowering beauty standards for Black women](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/portrait-of-black-woman-with-braided-hairstyle-and-embroidered-dress.jpg)

![The image celebrates cultural heritage by highlighting a striking woman whose textured hair is framed by an elaborate headwrap, creating a composition of poise. It subtly speaks to the importance of self-expression, tradition, and holistic beauty standards, and evokes contemplation about identity and ancestral connection](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/monochrome-portrait-of-woman-wearing-headwrap-with-intricate-hair-texture.jpg)

## Roots

The origins of [textured hair](/area/textured-hair/) are as ancient as humanity itself, a marvel of biological adaptation unfolding across millennia. Our deepest understanding of textured hair begins with the very structure of the follicle, the tiny well from which each strand emerges. Unlike the largely circular cross-section of straighter hair, afro-textured hair frequently exhibits an elliptical or kidney-bean shape. This unique geometry, coupled with the way the hair grows from a curved follicle, lends itself to the beautiful, tightly coiling patterns that defy simple description.

It is a biological signature, a testament to evolutionary wisdom. Scientists suggest that this particular morphology, these magnificent coils, likely developed as a natural shield against the sun’s intense ultraviolet radiation, particularly for our ancestors on the African continent. This protective canopy also permitted cooling air to circulate close to the scalp, serving as a thermoregulatory adaptation. So, the very texture of hair holds within it the echoes of ancient landscapes, of survival, and of the body’s ingenious capacity for adaptation.

Long before the imposition of external ideals, hair in many African societies was a language in itself, a visual lexicon conveying age, social status, marital standing, tribal affiliation, and even spiritual devotion. Traditional hairstyles were often intricate, demanding skill and communal effort to create. They were not merely adornments; they were profound expressions of self and community, with patterns and embellishments carrying specific meanings passed down through generations.

Consider the rich historical accounts of African hair practices, where communal hair braiding sessions served as significant social gatherings, strengthening bonds and transmitting cultural knowledge from elder to youth. The techniques employed were themselves an art form, often involving natural butters, herbs, and powders for moisture and health, reflecting a deep, intimate knowledge of the land and its gifts.

![This elegant study in monochrome celebrates the inherent beauty of textured hair in full afro form, framed by a minimal aesthetic and conveying the power of cultural identity. Radiant complexion enhances heritage, highlighting beauty standards, and affirming self-expression in the wearer](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/monochrome-profile-of-woman-with-afro-hairstyle-textured-hair-elegance.jpg)

## Suppression’s Earliest Echoes

The earliest overt policies designed to suppress [textured hair heritage](/area/textured-hair-heritage/) emerged with the brutal dawn of the transatlantic slave trade. Upon their arrival in the Americas, one of the first acts of dehumanization inflicted upon enslaved Africans was the forced shaving of their heads. This act severed a vital link to their former identities, their cultural heritage, and their spiritual connection to the world. It was a calculated assault, a deliberate attempt to erase the visible markers of a vibrant past and replace them with a uniform anonymity of subjugation.

The rich symbolism of African hairstyles, once a crown of glory, was stripped away, replaced by the stark reality of bondage. This initial violence against the hair was not arbitrary; it laid a foundation for future controls, signaling that one’s inherent being, including one’s hair, was no longer one’s own.

The colonial powers understood the power of visible identity. In various regions, as populations of African descent grew and some gained a measure of freedom, the need to enforce social hierarchy became a preoccupation. One striking, though certainly not isolated, example is the [Tignon Laws](/area/tignon-laws/) enacted in Louisiana in 1786 by Spanish colonial Governor Don Esteban Miró. These sumptuary laws mandated that Creole women of color, whether free or enslaved, cover their hair with a tignon ❉ a scarf or handkerchief ❉ when in public.

The stated purpose was to diminish “excessive attention to dress” among women of color, but the deeper aim was to visually mark them as belonging to a lower social stratum, regardless of their economic standing or freedom. These women, known for their elaborate and artful hairstyles that often displayed their coils with elegance and pride, were seen as a threat to the rigid racial and social order. The law sought to quell the perceived challenge to white women’s social standing and to reestablish a visible boundary between races.

> The Tignon Laws illustrate how policies can operate not just to control appearance, but to diminish social status and cultural heritage by targeting visible markers of identity.
The impact of such laws extended beyond mere aesthetics. They aimed to dismantle the self-definition and inherent dignity tied to hair. The message was clear: your hair, a signifier of your unique heritage, was to be hidden, suppressed, and controlled. This created a profound dissonance, forcing individuals to navigate a world that sought to deny a fundamental part of who they were.

Yet, as history often shows, the human spirit finds ways to resist. These women, in a remarkable act of defiance, transformed the tignon into a fashion statement, using vibrant fabrics and artful wraps that became symbols of resistance, cultural pride, and beauty. Their creativity turned an instrument of subjugation into a canvas for continued self-expression, demonstrating the enduring strength of heritage even under oppression.

The policies of this era, whether through the immediate violence of shaving or the legislative mandates of dress, established a precedent. They instilled a perception that textured hair, in its natural state, was something undesirable, unprofessional, or even unruly. This laid the groundwork for deeply ingrained societal biases that would continue to affect generations, subtly and overtly pushing for conformity to [Eurocentric beauty](/area/eurocentric-beauty/) standards. The very notion of “good hair” versus “bad hair” finds its roots in these historical attempts to devalue textured hair, creating an internalized struggle that persists even today. 

![The monochrome palette emphasizes the sculpted texture of her finger waves hairstyle, offering a nod to vintage glamour and a contemporary celebration of heritage hair artistry. Her elegant presence and poised expression invite contemplation on identity, beauty standards, and the power of self-expression](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/monochrome-portrait-of-elegant-woman-with-sculpted-finger-waves-hairstyle.jpg)

![The black and white portrait showcases the beauty of Afro coiled hair, creating an intimate connection with the viewer. The lighting adds depth to the image, capturing the essence of her texture and heritage, emphasizing the importance of self-expression and natural beauty within beauty standards](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/elegant-portrait-of-a-beautiful-woman-with-natural-afro-hair-style.jpg)

## Ritual

The deliberate suppression of textured [hair heritage](/area/hair-heritage/) extended well beyond initial colonial edicts, evolving into a pervasive system of societal and quasi-legal policies that shaped daily life. The era of Jim Crow in the United States, for instance, witnessed a deep entrenchment of discriminatory practices that, while often not explicitly targeting hair in formal legislation, created a climate where textured hair was systematically demonized. Advertisements of the time frequently depicted African Americans with exaggerated, demeaning features, including “nappy-haired caricatures,” reinforcing a negative perception of natural hair. This societal pressure, cloaked in the guise of “professionalism” or “neatness,” effectively operated as a policy, compelling individuals to alter their hair to fit into Eurocentric beauty standards. 

The popularization of chemical relaxers and hot combs in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, while offering a means for [Black women](/area/black-women/) to achieve a straighter aesthetic, also reflected a complex negotiation with these pervasive societal expectations. Madam C.J. Walker, a pioneering figure, created products that provided a pathway to conformity for many, even as she built economic independence within the [hair care](/area/hair-care/) industry.

This era marks a significant shift in hair care rituals, moving from traditional practices rooted in ancestral wisdom to those driven by a need to assimilate into a society that openly devalued natural textures. The choice to straighten hair, for many, was not simply a stylistic preference; it was often a prerequisite for employment, educational opportunities, or social acceptance.

![The monochrome image highlights the beauty of natural hair and facial contours, emphasizing the strength in understated elegance. This refined portrait invites contemplation on identity and heritage reflected in an individual](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/monochromatic-portraiture-of-a-woman-exhibiting-natural-textured-hair-style.jpg)

## How Did Beauty Standards Become Policy?

The imposition of Eurocentric beauty standards, favoring straight hair, became a de facto policy, deeply influencing perceptions of professionalism and acceptability. This was particularly evident in workplaces and educational institutions. Early court rulings, predating the CROWN Act, often sided with employers who prohibited natural or [protective styles](/area/protective-styles/) like braids and locs, deeming them “unprofessional” or “unusual.” A notable example is the 1981 case of **Rogers v.

American Airlines**, where a Black woman was denied the right to wear braids in the workplace, with the court ruling that hairstyles were not inherently tied to race. This legal interpretation effectively provided a loophole, allowing institutions to enforce racially biased grooming codes under the guise of “race-neutral” policies.

Schools, as microcosms of society, also became battlegrounds for hair freedom. Policies requiring hair to be of “reasonable size” or prohibiting styles deemed “distracting” disproportionately affected Black students. Accounts abound of Black children being sent home from school, suspended, or even denied participation in significant events like graduation ceremonies, simply because their [natural hair](/area/natural-hair/) or protective styles violated arbitrary dress codes.

This directly impacted their access to education, signaling that their inherent identity was unwelcome within these learning environments. The emotional and psychological toll on these children and their families was immense, forcing them to choose between their education and their cultural expression.

> School policies often acted as proxies for racial discrimination, forcing Black students to choose between education and their natural hair.
The persistent pressure to alter hair had profound implications for physical hair health as well. The constant use of heat and chemical treatments to straighten hair, driven by these societal pressures, led to various forms of hair damage, including burns, scarring, and hair loss. This highlights a tragic irony: policies of suppression not only impacted [cultural heritage](/area/cultural-heritage/) and self-perception but also caused tangible harm to the very strands they sought to control. The journey to reclaim and celebrate textured hair became intertwined with a quest for physical wellness, a return to ancestral practices that prioritized the health of the strand. 

- **Chemical Processing** ❉ The widespread adoption of relaxers and perms, while offering perceived conformity, often caused scalp irritation, breakage, and even permanent hair loss.

- **Heat Styling** ❉ Regular use of hot combs and flat irons, often daily, led to thermal damage, weakening the hair shaft and increasing fragility.

- **Lack of Tailored Products** ❉ A market historically saturated with products designed for straight hair meant textured hair received inadequate moisture and care, compounding dryness and brittleness.
Moreover, the colonial legacy extended beyond formal laws, manifesting in deeply ingrained societal attitudes. In the Caribbean, for instance, British colonialism imposed Eurocentric beauty ideals that favored straight hair, contributing to colourism ❉ a hierarchy where lighter skin and straighter hair were perceived as more desirable. This created a complex interplay of internal and external pressures, where self-worth could become tied to proximity to European aesthetics. The systematic devaluation of natural hair was not merely an aesthetic preference; it was a mechanism of control, subtly perpetuating a racial hierarchy. 

![The delicate placement of a patterned headwrap upon the girl, shows intergenerational care, and respect for Black hair traditions and beauty standards. This visual conveys ancestral strength, and the beauty of cultural heritage, and the importance of shared wellness practices passed down through generations, defining identity](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/young-girl-receiving-traditional-headwrap-a-black-and-white-portrait.jpg)

![The nuanced portrait, highlighting sophisticated Afro-textured style, invites contemplation on identity, heritage, and self-expression. The black and white treatment enriches the textures and emphasizes her features, promoting discussion on beauty standards and textured hair appreciation, showcasing natural hair](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/striking-black-and-white-portrait-of-woman-with-textured-hair-design.jpg)

## Relay

The enduring impact of [historical policies](/area/historical-policies/) suppressing textured hair heritage continues to reverberate, shaping contemporary experiences and fueling persistent acts of resistance. Even after the overt legal frameworks of segregation crumbled, the underlying ideology that devalued textured hair persisted, manifesting in subtle and overt forms of discrimination. This lingering legacy has spurred legislative movements, community organizing, and a profound cultural reckoning, all centered on reclaiming the narrative of textured hair. 

![This portrait evokes Old Hollywood splendor through the lens of contemporary beauty standards. The strategic shaping of her hair emphasizes ancestral heritage and offers a sophisticated take on natural expressive styling](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/monochromatic-portrait-of-a-woman-with-exquisite-finger-wave-hairstyle.jpg)

## How Does Discrimination Persist Today?

Despite decades of civil rights advocacy, [hair discrimination](/area/hair-discrimination/) remained a prevalent issue in the workplace and educational settings. The loophole in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which did not explicitly include protections against discrimination based on phenotypical markers like hair texture, allowed employers and schools to continue discriminatory practices. This meant that while direct [racial discrimination](/area/racial-discrimination/) was outlawed, a Black individual could still be denied a job or educational opportunity due to their natural hair, which was often deemed “unprofessional” or “distracting.” Research from 2023 indicates that Black women’s hair is 2.5 times more likely than white women’s hair to be perceived as “unprofessional.” The same study revealed that nearly two-thirds (66%) of Black women adjust their hair for job interviews, with 41% altering their hair from curly to straight. This statistic powerfully illuminates the tangible, ongoing pressure to conform. 

The psychological and economic burden of this discrimination is immense. For individuals, facing constant scrutiny or being forced to alter one’s natural appearance can lead to feelings of alienation, reduced self-esteem, and chronic stress. Economically, the constant need for chemical treatments, extensions, or elaborate styling to achieve a desired “professional” look can be costly, diverting resources that could otherwise be used for personal or familial advancement. This creates a cycle where historical policies, though no longer explicitly on the books, continue to exact a price in the present. 

![This evocative portrait of a woman adorned with locs captures the interplay of light and shadow, accentuating both strength and vulnerability. The image honors the heritage of textured hair while inviting viewers to contemplate the complexities of identity, beauty standards, and the ongoing dialogue around hair expression](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/monochromatic-portrait-of-an-african-american-woman-with-locs-and-shadow-play.jpg)

## What Is the CROWN Act’s Role in Reversing Historical Harm?

In response to this persistent discrimination, the CROWN Act, an acronym for “Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair,” emerged as a pivotal piece of legislation. First introduced in California in 2019, it expanded the definition of race in existing statutes to include traits historically associated with race, specifically [hair texture](/area/hair-texture/) and protective styles such as braids, locs, twists, and knots. The Act aims to provide explicit legal protection against discrimination based on hairstyles that are commonly associated with a particular race or national origin.

As of September 2024, twenty-seven states have enacted [CROWN Act](/area/crown-act/) legislation, and the bill has passed the U.S. House of Representatives twice.

> The CROWN Act stands as a legislative effort to dismantle centuries of hair-based discrimination, recognizing textured hair as an integral part of racial identity.
The CROWN Act represents a significant step in reversing centuries of historical harm. It legally affirms that hair texture is not a mutable characteristic to be controlled or altered at will by employers or schools, but rather an intrinsic aspect of racial identity. This shift in legal perspective challenges the very foundation of “color-blind” racism, which often disguised discriminatory practices under supposedly neutral grooming policies. The implementation of the CROWN Act seeks to cultivate environments where individuals of African descent can express their cultural heritage through their hair without fear of punitive consequences. 

- **Legal Redress** ❉ Provides a clear legal pathway for individuals to challenge discrimination based on hair texture or style in workplaces and schools.

- **Cultural Affirmation** ❉ Sends a powerful message of validation, affirming that natural textured hair and traditional protective styles are acceptable and professional.

- **Shifting Norms** ❉ Promotes a broader societal acceptance of diverse hair aesthetics, gradually challenging long-held Eurocentric beauty standards.
However, the passage of laws alone does not automatically dismantle entrenched biases. There is a continuing need for education and cultural understanding to fully implement the spirit of the CROWN Act. Studies show that even with the law in place, many Black women professionals have not received explicit communication from their employers regarding these protections. This highlights the persistent gap between legal mandate and lived experience, underscoring the ongoing work required to foster true equity.

The fight for hair liberation extends beyond legislation, requiring continued advocacy, community engagement, and a deeper societal appreciation for the rich heritage embodied in every strand of textured hair. The conversation now shifts from mere legality to the cultivation of genuine respect and understanding, moving towards a future where textured hair heritage is universally celebrated, free from the shadows of historical suppression.

![The artful chiaroscuro accentuates the woman](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/sophisticated-black-woman-short-natural-hair-portrait-studio-black-and-white.jpg)

![A confident gaze emerges from this monochromatic portrait, where tightly coiled texture and shaved sides meet in artful contrast. The striking hairstyle embodies cultural expression, celebrating identity within diverse communities while inviting reflections on beauty standards](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/monochromatic-portrait-undercut-hairstyle-revealing-confident-mixed-race.jpg)

## Reflection

The journey of textured hair, from its ancient biological wisdom to its current resurgence as a vibrant emblem of cultural heritage, is a profound testament to resilience. Historical policies, both legislated and implicit, relentlessly sought to diminish this beauty, to sever the deep connection between hair and identity. Yet, the helix always finds its way back to its source, reminding us that true heritage can be bent but not broken. The stories of Tignon Laws, of workplace discrimination, and of children excluded from school because of their coils are not simply historical footnotes; they are living narratives, echoing through generations, reminding us of the profound strength required to maintain cultural authenticity in the face of systemic suppression. 

Our understanding now connects the biological marvel of a tightly coiled strand to the ancestral wisdom of care, and then to the social policies that attempted to define its worth. The “Soul of a Strand” indeed pulses with this layered history ❉ the elemental biology that allowed our forebears to thrive, the tender rituals of care passed down through hands that knew intimately the nuances of textured hair, and the unbound helix of identity that continually resists external impositions. The conversation about policies that suppressed textured hair heritage is not one solely of past grievances; it is a vital exploration of how inherited wisdom and innate beauty persist, shaping a collective future where every texture is celebrated as a manifestation of an unbroken lineage. 

![The monochromatic portrait captures the artistry of hair sculpting, celebrating the beauty of texture and symmetrical lines in a contemporary twist. The woman’s poised expression and luminous complexion draw the viewer in, symbolizing confidence and the enduring beauty of self-expression through artful coiffure](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/elegant-black-and-white-portrait-of-a-woman-with-sculpted-bob-hairstyle.jpg)

![This dramatic monochromatic portrait celebrates the striking beauty of an intentional bald style and distinct hair design. The image highlights empowerment, challenging traditional beauty standards and underscoring the impact of textured artistry and individuality in expressing personal identity and cultural narrative](/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/monochrome-portrait-of-a-bald-woman-featuring-a-striking-hair-design.jpg)

## References

- Byrd, Ayana, and Lori Tharps. 2014. Hair Story: Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America. St. Martin’s Griffin.

- Gould, Virginia M. 1996. “The Free Women of Color of New Orleans: Race, Status, Class, and Sexuality in the French and Spanish Periods.” In The Devil’s Lane: Sex and Race in the Early South, edited by Catherine Clinton and Michele Gillespie, pp. 207-227. Oxford University Press.

- Greene, D. Wendy. 2021. “Rewritten Opinion of Rogers v. American Airlines, Inc.” University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class, Vol. 21, Issue 2, Article 8.

- Hamilton, Alfonzo. 2021. “Untangling Discrimination: The CROWN Act and Protecting Black Hair.” University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 89, Issue 3, Article 11.

- Jones, Ashley. 2022. “Can I Touch Your Hair?: Business Diversity, Slavery, Disparate Outcomes, and the Crown Act.” Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & Law, Vol. 14, Issue 1, Article 8.

- Kempf, Jennifer A. et al. 2024. “Hair Discrimination and the Racialization of Black Young People’s Bodies: A Critical Analysis of Racism in U.K. School Settings.” Oxford Academic.

- Mercier, Caitlin M. Jaylen Bychowski, and Wan-Ju Yang. 2025. “Skin Deep: A Relational-Cultural Approach to Colorism for Black Women in Psychotherapy.” Article.

- Omotos, Adetutu. 2018. “The Significance of African Hair in Ancient African Civilizations.” Journal of Pan African Studies.

- Tolliver, Starling, et al. 2025. “Historical Perspectives on Hair Care and Common Styling Practices in Black Women.” Cutis, Vol. 115, Issue 3, pp. 95-98.

- Wong, Nikita, et al. 2025. “Historical Perspectives on Hair Care and Common Styling Practices in Black Women.” Cutis, Vol. 115, Issue 3.

## Glossary

### [Natural Hair Policies](https://roothea.co/area/natural-hair-policies/)

Meaning ❉ Natural Hair Policies denote the structured precepts or implicit expectations governing the presentation and acceptance of textured hair, particularly for individuals with Black or mixed heritage, across various organizational and social settings.

### [Cultural Policies](https://roothea.co/area/cultural-policies/)

Meaning ❉ Cultural Policies, within the tender context of textured hair understanding, signify the guiding, often unstated, societal principles that influence how communities and individuals approach Black and mixed-race hair.

### [Natural Hair](https://roothea.co/area/natural-hair/)

Meaning ❉ Natural Hair describes hair that maintains its original structural configuration, untouched by chemical processes like relaxers, texturizers, or permanent color that alter its natural coil, curl, or wave definition.

### [Carceral Hair Policies](https://roothea.co/area/carceral-hair-policies/)

Meaning ❉ Carceral Hair Policies refer to institutional regulations, often found in settings like schools, workplaces, or correctional facilities, that impose restrictions or mandates on hair appearance, particularly impacting individuals with textured hair.

### [Post-Slavery Policies](https://roothea.co/area/post-slavery-policies/)

Meaning ❉ Post-Slavery Policies refer to the enduring societal frameworks and systemic measures enacted following the formal abolition of slavery, which subtly shaped the landscape of textured hair understanding, care systematization, and practical application for Black and mixed-race individuals.

### [Hair Discrimination](https://roothea.co/area/hair-discrimination/)

Meaning ❉ Hair Discrimination, a subtle yet impactful bias, refers to the differential and often unfavorable treatment of individuals based on the natural characteristics or chosen styles of their hair, especially those textures and forms historically worn by Black and mixed-race persons.

### [School Appearance Policies](https://roothea.co/area/school-appearance-policies/)

Meaning ❉ School Appearance Policies refer to the formal guidelines established by educational institutions concerning student presentation, often extending to hair.

### [Textured Hair](https://roothea.co/area/textured-hair/)

Meaning ❉ Textured hair describes the natural hair structure characterized by its unique curl patterns, ranging from expansive waves to closely wound coils, a common trait across individuals of Black and mixed heritage.

### [Ancestral Hair Practices](https://roothea.co/area/ancestral-hair-practices/)

Meaning ❉ Ancestral Hair Practices signify the accumulated knowledge and customary techniques passed down through generations within Black and mixed-race communities, specifically concerning the well-being and styling of textured hair.

### [Hair Care](https://roothea.co/area/hair-care/)

Meaning ❉ Hair Care, when understood through the lens of textured hair, signifies a mindful discipline for preserving the vigor of coily, kinky, and wavy strands.

## Explore Your Heritage

### [Which Historical Examples Demonstrate Traditional Butters' Importance in Textured Hair Heritage?](https://roothea.co/question/which-historical-examples-demonstrate-traditional-butters-importance-in-textured-hair-heritage/)
![This black and white portrait embodies ancestral heritage with its intricate braided updo, a timeless styling of textured hair which speaks volumes of cultural identity and the enduring artistry within Black hair traditions each braid reflecting meticulous detail in the pursuit of beauty and wellness.](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/elegant-black-woman-braided-hairstyle-updo-regal-profile-black-and-white.jpg)

### [What Is the Historical Link between Plant Use and Textured Hair Heritage?](https://roothea.co/question/what-is-the-historical-link-between-plant-use-and-textured-hair-heritage/)
![This evocative portrait celebrates the beauty and complexity of natural Afro-textured hair, emphasizing coiled structures while highlighting the intrinsic link between hair and heritage. The nuanced monochromatic tones amplify the child](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/monochrome-portrait-of-a-young-person-with-afro-textured-curly-coiled-hair.jpg)

### [Which Historical African Plants Contributed to Healthy Textured Hair Heritage?](https://roothea.co/question/which-historical-african-plants-contributed-to-healthy-textured-hair-heritage/)
![The monochrome image captures a nightly self-care ritual, securing a silk bonnet to protect textured hair and preserve moisture, reflecting ancestral heritage and Black hair traditions rooted in maintaining healthy, well-hydrated coils, promoting wellness and embracing the natural beauty of coiled formations.](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/woman-securing-silk-bonnet-overnight-hair-protection-black-and-white-photo.jpg)

### [In What Ways Does Hair Typing Reflect Historical Biases against Textured Hair Heritage?](https://roothea.co/question/in-what-ways-does-hair-typing-reflect-historical-biases-against-textured-hair-heritage/)
![Resilient hands, embodying ancestral heritage, pass down the art of fiber work, reflecting shared wisdom through textured hair kinship. The monochrome palette accentuates depth, emphasizing holistic connection and the transference of cultural identity woven into each fiber, highlighting timeless Black hair traditions.](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/intergenerational-kinship-weaving-wisdom-textured-hair-legacy-in-black-and-white.jpg)

### [What Historical Plant Uses Highlight Textured Hair Heritage?](https://roothea.co/question/what-historical-plant-uses-highlight-textured-hair-heritage/)
![Eloquent advocacy meets natural hair excellence in this monochrome study, showcasing defined coils, high-density hair, and cultural heritage. The subject](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/woman-speaks-out-natural-coily-hair-with-low-porosity-definition.jpg)

### [Can the Historical Resilience of Textured Hair Heritage Offer Guidance for Contemporary Care?](https://roothea.co/question/can-the-historical-resilience-of-textured-hair-heritage-offer-guidance-for-contemporary-care/)
![The monochrome portrait evokes timeless grace, showcasing the beauty of natural coiled texture and the artistry of a traditional headwrap. This image serves as an intimate exploration of self-expression, honoring ancestral heritage and the enduring power of cultural adornment, reflective of holistic self-care.](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/elegant-portrait-of-woman-with-textured-hair-wrapped-in-patterned-headwrap.jpg)

### [In What Ways Did Colonial Policies Impact the Heritage of Textured Hair Care?](https://roothea.co/question/in-what-ways-did-colonial-policies-impact-the-heritage-of-textured-hair-care/)
![This black and white portrait captures the serene dignity of a Bolivian woman, showcasing her traditional dress and expertly braided textured hair, a potent symbol of cultural identity and ancestral heritage. The aguayo shawl and bowler hat frame her expressive features, conveying depth and inner strength.](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/bolivian-woman-wearing-traditional-aguayo-shawl-and-hat-black-and-white-portrait.jpg)

### [What Historical Events Shaped the Perception and Treatment of Textured Hair Heritage?](https://roothea.co/question/what-historical-events-shaped-the-perception-and-treatment-of-textured-hair-heritage/)
![The monochromatic image conveys a sense of timeless ritual, highlighting the intentionality behind crafting herbal hair treatments rooted in cultural heritage, a deeply connected practice for textured hair health and reverence for ancestral hair care knowledge and holistic self care practices.](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/hands-preparing-herbal-hair-treatment-infusion-black-and-white-photography.jpg)

### [How Do Historical Styling Methods Safeguard Textured Hair Heritage?](https://roothea.co/question/how-do-historical-styling-methods-safeguard-textured-hair-heritage/)
![Embracing the ancestral heritage of holistic hair care, clear water enriches fenugreek seeds, releasing their potent benefits. This ancient ingredient nourishes Black hair traditions and mixed-race hair narratives, promoting expressive styling and resilient formations for generations.](https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/fenugreek-seeds-being-dosed-with-water-drops-close-up-black-and-white.jpg)

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://roothea.co/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://roothea.co/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "What Historical Policies Suppressed Textured Hair Heritage?",
            "item": "https://roothea.co/question/what-historical-policies-suppressed-textured-hair-heritage/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://roothea.co/question/what-historical-policies-suppressed-textured-hair-heritage/"
    },
    "headline": "What Historical Policies Suppressed Textured Hair Heritage? ❉ Question",
    "description": "Historical policies suppressed textured hair heritage by enforcing Eurocentric beauty standards, denying identity, and restricting cultural expression. ❉ Question",
    "url": "https://roothea.co/question/what-historical-policies-suppressed-textured-hair-heritage/",
    "author": {
        "@type": "Person",
        "name": "Roothea",
        "url": "https://roothea.co/author/roothea/"
    },
    "datePublished": "2025-06-08T22:27:12+08:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-06-08T22:27:12+08:00",
    "publisher": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Roothea"
    },
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://roothea.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/black-woman-portrait-artistic-braided-hairstyle-textured-hair-expressions.jpg",
        "caption": "The braided hairstyle, a celebration of textured hair's artistic potential, reflects cultural legacy and personal expression. This captivating portrait invites contemplation on ancestral heritage, beauty standards and wellness while conveying an authentic narrative of identity through artful styling."
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How did beauty standards become policy?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "\nThe imposition of Eurocentric beauty standards, favoring straight hair, became a de facto policy, deeply influencing perceptions of professionalism and acceptability. This was particularly evident in workplaces and educational institutions. Early court rulings, predating the CROWN Act, often sided with employers who prohibited natural or protective styles like braids and locs, deeming them \"unprofessional\" or \"unusual.\" A notable example is the 1981 case of Rogers v. American Airlines, where a Black woman was denied the right to wear braids in the workplace, with the court ruling that hairstyles were not inherently tied to race. This legal interpretation effectively provided a loophole, allowing institutions to enforce racially biased grooming codes under the guise of \"race-neutral\" policies.\n"
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How does discrimination persist today?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "\nDespite decades of civil rights advocacy, hair discrimination remained a prevalent issue in the workplace and educational settings. The loophole in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which did not explicitly include protections against discrimination based on phenotypical markers like hair texture, allowed employers and schools to continue discriminatory practices. This meant that while direct racial discrimination was outlawed, a Black individual could still be denied a job or educational opportunity due to their natural hair, which was often deemed \"unprofessional\" or \"distracting.\" Research from 2023 indicates that Black women's hair is 2.5 times more likely than white women's hair to be perceived as \"unprofessional.\" The same study revealed that nearly two-thirds (66%) of Black women adjust their hair for job interviews, with 41% altering their hair from curly to straight. This statistic powerfully illuminates the tangible, ongoing pressure to conform.\n"
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What is the CROWN Act's role in reversing historical harm?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "\nIn response to this persistent discrimination, the CROWN Act, an acronym for \"Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair,\" emerged as a pivotal piece of legislation. First introduced in California in 2019, it expanded the definition of race in existing statutes to include traits historically associated with race, specifically hair texture and protective styles such as braids, locs, twists, and knots. The Act aims to provide explicit legal protection against discrimination based on hairstyles that are commonly associated with a particular race or national origin. As of September 2024, twenty-seven states have enacted CROWN Act legislation, and the bill has passed the U.S. House of Representatives twice.\n"
            }
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebPage",
    "@id": "https://roothea.co/question/what-historical-policies-suppressed-textured-hair-heritage/",
    "mentions": [
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/textured-hair/",
            "name": "Textured Hair",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/textured-hair/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Textured hair describes the natural hair structure characterized by its unique curl patterns, ranging from expansive waves to closely wound coils, a common trait across individuals of Black and mixed heritage."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/textured-hair-heritage/",
            "name": "Textured Hair Heritage",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/textured-hair-heritage/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ \"Textured Hair Heritage\" denotes the deep-seated, historically transmitted understanding and practices specific to hair exhibiting coil, kink, and wave patterns, particularly within Black and mixed-race ancestries."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/tignon-laws/",
            "name": "Tignon Laws",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/tignon-laws/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ The Tignon Laws, enacted in late 18th-century colonial Louisiana, were decrees requiring free and enslaved Black women to cover their hair with a tignon or headscarf when in public spaces."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/eurocentric-beauty/",
            "name": "Eurocentric Beauty",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/eurocentric-beauty/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Eurocentric Beauty describes an aesthetic framework that historically positions features and hair textures common in European populations as the prevailing ideal."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/hair-heritage/",
            "name": "Hair Heritage",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/hair-heritage/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Hair Heritage denotes the ancestral continuum of knowledge, customary practices, and genetic characteristics that shape the distinct nature of Black and mixed-race hair."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/black-women/",
            "name": "Black Women",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/black-women/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Black women, as central figures in textured hair understanding, gently guide the comprehension of coily and kinky strands."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/hair-care/",
            "name": "Hair Care",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/hair-care/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Hair Care, when understood through the lens of textured hair, signifies a mindful discipline for preserving the vigor of coily, kinky, and wavy strands."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/protective-styles/",
            "name": "Protective Styles",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/protective-styles/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Protective Styles denote a thoughtful strategy in textured hair care, meticulously crafted to shield the hair's more vulnerable lengths from routine manipulation and environmental exposure."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/natural-hair/",
            "name": "Natural Hair",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/natural-hair/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Natural Hair describes hair that maintains its original structural configuration, untouched by chemical processes like relaxers, texturizers, or permanent color that alter its natural coil, curl, or wave definition."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/cultural-heritage/",
            "name": "Cultural Heritage",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/cultural-heritage/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Cultural Heritage, within the context of textured hair, represents the accumulated wisdom, practices, and perspectives passed through generations within Black and mixed-race communities concerning hair health, appearance, and social significance."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/historical-policies/",
            "name": "Historical Policies",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/historical-policies/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Historical Policies refer to the foundational directives, societal arrangements, and established norms from earlier periods that shaped the lived realities of individuals with Black and mixed-race heritage, notably influencing their hair experiences."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/racial-discrimination/",
            "name": "Racial Discrimination",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/racial-discrimination/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Racial discrimination, when considered through the lens of textured hair, describes the unfair treatment or prejudicial disadvantage experienced by individuals due to their hair's natural form, particularly those with coils, kinks, or waves."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/hair-discrimination/",
            "name": "Hair Discrimination",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/hair-discrimination/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Hair Discrimination, a subtle yet impactful bias, refers to the differential and often unfavorable treatment of individuals based on the natural characteristics or chosen styles of their hair, especially those textures and forms historically worn by Black and mixed-race persons."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/hair-texture/",
            "name": "Hair Texture",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/hair-texture/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Hair Texture identifies the inherent physical configuration of individual hair strands, from gentle waves to tightly coiled patterns, a fundamental characteristic for those with Black and mixed heritage hair."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/crown-act/",
            "name": "CROWN Act",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/crown-act/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ The CROWN Act establishes legal protections against discrimination based on hair texture and styles frequently worn by individuals of Black or mixed heritage."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/natural-hair-policies/",
            "name": "Natural Hair Policies",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/natural-hair-policies/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Natural Hair Policies denote the structured precepts or implicit expectations governing the presentation and acceptance of textured hair, particularly for individuals with Black or mixed heritage, across various organizational and social settings."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/cultural-policies/",
            "name": "Cultural Policies",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/cultural-policies/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Cultural Policies, within the tender context of textured hair understanding, signify the guiding, often unstated, societal principles that influence how communities and individuals approach Black and mixed-race hair."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/carceral-hair-policies/",
            "name": "Carceral Hair Policies",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/carceral-hair-policies/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Carceral Hair Policies refer to institutional regulations, often found in settings like schools, workplaces, or correctional facilities, that impose restrictions or mandates on hair appearance, particularly impacting individuals with textured hair."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/post-slavery-policies/",
            "name": "Post-Slavery Policies",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/post-slavery-policies/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Post-Slavery Policies refer to the enduring societal frameworks and systemic measures enacted following the formal abolition of slavery, which subtly shaped the landscape of textured hair understanding, care systematization, and practical application for Black and mixed-race individuals."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/school-appearance-policies/",
            "name": "School Appearance Policies",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/school-appearance-policies/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ School Appearance Policies refer to the formal guidelines established by educational institutions concerning student presentation, often extending to hair."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://roothea.co/area/ancestral-hair-practices/",
            "name": "Ancestral Hair Practices",
            "url": "https://roothea.co/area/ancestral-hair-practices/",
            "description": "Meaning ❉ Ancestral Hair Practices signify the accumulated knowledge and customary techniques passed down through generations within Black and mixed-race communities, specifically concerning the well-being and styling of textured hair."
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://roothea.co/question/what-historical-policies-suppressed-textured-hair-heritage/
