
Roots
Consider, for a moment, the quiet wisdom held within each coil, each strand, each carefully braided pattern. These are not merely fibers emerging from the scalp; they are living chronicles, carrying ancestral memory and the indelible imprint of generations. To truly understand textured hair perceptions, one must listen to the deep hum of its heritage, tracing its path from the dawn of human adornment to its resonant presence today.
This is a story woven into the very fabric of identity, a narrative that speaks of resilience, of beauty in the face of imposed standards, and of an enduring connection to the earth and spirit. This journey through time and cultural landscape asks us to re-examine what we think we know about hair, seeing it as a profound keeper of history, a silent orator of belonging, and a sacred vessel of lineage.

The Hair’s Ancient Architecture
The physical blueprint of textured hair, with its remarkable diversity in curl patterns, thickness, and density, holds a biological splendor. Scientifically, the elliptical shape of the hair follicle and the unique distribution of keratin within the strand contribute to its characteristic coiling. This biological reality, however, was rarely viewed in isolation by ancient communities. Instead, the hair was seen as an extension of one’s being, a natural crown, deeply entwined with spiritual and social structures.
The very way hair grew from the head, reaching upwards, connected humanity to the celestial, drawing down wisdom from above. This perspective formed the bedrock of early perceptions, establishing hair not as a mere aesthetic accessory, but as a vital conduit of personal and communal identity.
Textured hair, in its biological essence, is a living record, whispering tales of ancient connections and the unbroken lineage of its caretakers.
Across various ancestral African societies, the hair’s state, length, and style communicated an entire lexicon of personal and collective information. A person’s hairstyle could indicate their age, their marital standing, their social rank, or even their tribal affiliation. In West African societies from the 1400s, one could discern much about an individual by their coiffure. Such styles were not casual choices but deliberate expressions of community and an individual’s place within it.

What Did Hair Symbolize In Ancient African Societies?
Before external influences sought to redefine beauty, hair in Africa was a profound language. It communicated beyond words, serving as a visual marker of belonging and achievement.
- Social Status ❉ Elaborate styles often marked royalty or high-ranking individuals.
- Age and Gender ❉ Specific coiffures might signify a girl’s passage into womanhood or a man’s readiness for war.
- Tribal Identity ❉ Distinct patterns and adornments served as immediate identifiers of one’s ethnic group.
- Spiritual Connection ❉ For many, hair was considered the body’s most elevated part, a link to the divine, spirits, and ancestors.
The care rituals surrounding hair were communal, bonding experiences, often taking hours or even days to complete. These sessions were not simply about grooming; they were moments of shared stories, tradition, and intergenerational wisdom, further solidifying the hair’s sacred and communal place.

Ritual
The perception of textured hair, once rooted in ancestral reverence and deep cultural meaning, began to shift dramatically with the arrival of colonialism and the transatlantic slave trade. This period introduced external gazes and ideologies that sought to strip away the inherent worth of Black and mixed-race hair, replacing it with standards alien to its very nature. The systematic dehumanization of enslaved Africans included the forced shaving of their heads upon arrival in the Americas, an act designed to erase their identity and sever their ties to homeland and heritage. This deliberate cultural dismantling initiated a long, painful journey where natural hair became associated with notions of being “unprofessional,” “unattractive,” or “unclean” in the Western world.

The Imposition of Altered Ideals
The forced adaptation to European beauty standards, often out of necessity for survival, led to the adoption of practices designed to chemically or thermally straighten textured hair. The “good hair” concept, which emerged during the abolition era, equated straighter hair with a higher social standing and greater acceptance. This internal hierarchy, based on proximity to whiteness, permeated communities, making straightened hair a perceived requirement for social and economic mobility. Early chemical relaxers, like those marketed by Garrett Augustus Morgan in the early 20th century, and later widely available products, provided a means to conform, albeit at a cost to hair health and often deeply held self-perception.

How Did Headwraps Become a Symbol?
In colonial contexts, even seemingly simple garments like headwraps took on layers of meaning. In 1786, Louisiana’s governor, Esteban Rodríguez Miró, enacted the Tignon Laws, compelling free Black women to cover their elaborately styled hair with a tignon or headscarf. This law aimed to diminish their social standing and prevent them from drawing attention from white men, asserting a visual social marker that placed them closer to enslaved women.
Yet, in a powerful act of defiance, these women transformed the tignon into a statement of their own, creating colorful and ornate headwraps, thereby reclaiming a symbol of subjugation as one of cultural expression and resilience. This ability to repurpose and reframe oppressive symbols stands as a testament to an enduring spirit.
The historical imposition of foreign beauty standards compelled a complex relationship with textured hair, often balancing survival with expressions of defiance.
The introduction of tools like the hot comb by Madam C.J. Walker further normalized hair straightening as a pathway to perceived societal acceptance. While these tools offered a semblance of control and conformity, they also entrenched the idea that natural coils were somehow “unmanaged” or “undone,” contributing to a collective conditioning that spanned generations. This period saw the systematic devaluing of indigenous hair practices, pushing them into the shadows of a dominant aesthetic.

Relay
The legacy of historical influences on textured hair perceptions extends far beyond the era of slavery and colonization, continuing to shape experiences in contemporary society. The echoes of past injustices, particularly those rooted in Eurocentric beauty ideals, reverberate in institutions and daily interactions, creating tangible barriers for individuals with textured hair. This systemic issue is often referred to as hair discrimination, and it targets hair that is tightly coiled or styles commonly worn by Black individuals, including afros, locs, twists, and braids.

Legacies of Policing Hair Texture in Society
One particularly poignant historical example of this policing is the “Pencil Test,” utilized during the Apartheid era in South Africa. Authorities would place a pencil in a person’s hair; if it remained lodged due to the hair’s tight curls, that individual was classified as “Native” (Black) or “Colored” on identity documents, leading to segregation and severe exploitation. This practice vividly demonstrates how hair texture was weaponized to enforce racial hierarchies, underscoring that perceptions of hair were not merely aesthetic judgments but instruments of sociopolitical control.
Similarly, in the post-slavery United States, “The Comb Test” was sometimes employed, where organizations would hang a fine-tooth comb outside their doors, indicating that visitors whose hair could not be easily combed were unwelcome. These tests, though seemingly simplistic, functioned as powerful gatekeepers, denying access to opportunities and reinforcing the notion that only hair conforming to European standards was acceptable.
These discriminatory practices are not confined to the past. Modern studies reveal the persistent impact of these historical perceptions. For instance, a 2019 study published by Dove, a personal care company, revealed that Black Women are 1.5 Times More Likely Than Other Women to Be Sent Home from Work or Know of a Woman Sent Home Due to Her Hairstyle (Dove, 2019, as cited in SHRM).
This alarming statistic speaks to the ongoing economic and professional consequences of hair discrimination, directly linked to centuries of enforced beauty standards. The fight for acceptance is thus an enduring one, compelling legislative action.
| Era / Context Pre-Colonial Africa |
| Mechanism of Control Cultural norms, spiritual beliefs |
| Impact on Textured Hair Signifier of identity, status, spirituality, beauty within community |
| Era / Context Slavery / Colonialism |
| Mechanism of Control Forced shaving, Tignon Laws, "wool" classification |
| Impact on Textured Hair Dehumanization, erasure of identity, suppression of culture |
| Era / Context Post-Slavery / Jim Crow |
| Mechanism of Control "Comb Test," "Pencil Test," "Good Hair" ideology |
| Impact on Textured Hair Barriers to employment, education, social mobility; psychological harm |
| Era / Context Modern Day |
| Mechanism of Control Implicit bias, dress codes, lack of legal protection |
| Impact on Textured Hair Continued workplace and school discrimination; mental and physical health effects |
| Era / Context Understanding these historical mechanisms illuminates the persistent need for protective legislation and cultural shifts that honor textured hair heritage. |

The CROWN Act Movement and Hair Science
In response to this pervasive discrimination, legislative efforts like the CROWN Act (Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair) have emerged in the United States. This legislation, which prohibits discrimination based on an individual’s hair texture or hairstyle, seeks to dismantle race-based hair bias in federally assisted programs, housing, public accommodations, and employment. California passed the first CROWN Act in 2019, and as of June 2023, twenty-three states have followed suit.
The federal CROWN Act has passed the House of Representatives multiple times but has faced obstacles in the Senate. These legal battles underscore the deep-seated nature of hair discrimination, demonstrating that ingrained perceptions require broad, systemic interventions.
The understanding of hair texture itself has also been subject to historical biases. Early 20th-century hair typing systems, such as the “hair gauge” invented by Eugen Fischer, a German Nazi “scientist,” were used to determine individuals’ “proximity to whiteness” based on their hair texture. These systems were instruments of racial categorization, aiming to support racist ideologies.
While contemporary hair typing charts, like the Andre Walker system, offer useful descriptive frameworks for hair care, their historical precursors reveal how scientific classification can be co-opted to perpetuate hierarchies and prejudice. This history compels a mindful approach to modern hair science, ensuring it serves to celebrate diversity, not to reinforce outdated biases.
The path toward honoring textured hair involves not only acknowledging historical wrongs but actively constructing pathways for its rightful place in all spaces.
The widespread use of chemical relaxers, a direct consequence of historical pressure to conform, also carries significant health implications. Recent studies have highlighted links between frequent use of certain hair relaxers and increased health risks, including a 50% increase in uterine cancer risk for Black women who used relaxers more than twice a year or for over five years, as reported by a Boston University study. This health dimension adds another layer of gravity to the historical influences on textured hair perceptions, showing that external pressures have exacted a physical toll on Black women and their ancestral care practices.

Do Hair Classifications Aid Understanding or Perpetuate Bias?
Hair classification systems, while offering a language to discuss hair types, have a complex and sometimes troubling history.
- Early Systems ❉ These were often designed to classify individuals based on perceived racial hierarchies, linking hair texture to “proximity to whiteness”.
- Modern Typologies ❉ Contemporary systems offer descriptive categories for hair care, but some still face criticism for implicitly favoring looser curls, contributing to “texturism,” which is discrimination based on hair texture, where looser curls are seen as more desirable.
- Decolonizing Perception ❉ A critical awareness of these historical biases allows for a decolonization of perception, enabling a celebration of all hair textures for their inherent beauty and unique qualities.
The ongoing journey involves a commitment to education and advocacy, challenging societal norms that devalue textured hair, and celebrating the deep historical roots and cultural significance of each strand.

Reflection
The whispers of the past, carried on the breeze of historical currents, continue to shape our perceptions of textured hair. Each coil, each twist, each loc carries the weight of ancient reverence, the scars of forced assimilation, and the enduring spirit of reclamation. This history is not a distant echo; it is a living narrative within every strand, a testament to the profound resilience of Black and mixed-race communities.
Recognizing these deep ancestral rhythms allows us to see beyond superficial judgments, moving towards a world where every hair texture is met with intrinsic appreciation and understanding. The Soul of a Strand truly resides in this continuous unfolding, a vibrant, vital archive that breathes life into forgotten histories and celebrates the enduring beauty of our collective hair heritage, a heritage that stands strong and luminous against the test of time.

References
- Byrd, Ayana D. and Lori L. Tharps. Hair Story ❉ Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America. St. Martin’s Publishing, 2001.
- Johnson, Elizabeth. Resistance and Empowerment in Black Women’s Hair Styling. Routledge, 2016.
- Rooks, Noliwe M. Hair Raising ❉ Beauty, Culture, and African American Women. Rutgers University Press, 1996.
- Wilcox, Amanda. “Femininity, Hair Relaxers, and the Impact of Beauty Standards on Black Women’s Health.” Journal of Women’s Health, 2017.
- Gordon, Mark. “The Cultural Significance of Hair in Ancient African Civilizations.” Journal of Pan African Studies, 2018.
- Aghili, Mohammad. “The Impact of Colonialism on African Identity.” Journal of African Studies, 2013.
- Shepherd, Nicole. “Texturism ❉ The Discrimination of Afro-textured Hair in Favor of Looser Curl Patterns.” Hair and Society Review, 2018.
- Mbilishaka, Omaira, et al. “The Roots of Hair Politics ❉ A Review of Hair Discrimination and its Impact on Black Women’s Well-being.” Journal of Black Psychology, 2020.
- Robinson, Carla L. “Hair as Race ❉ Why ‘Good Hair’ May Be Bad for Black Women.” Duke Journal of Gender, Law & Policy, 2011.
- Patton, Tracey O. “African-American Women and Hair ❉ Is Hair Just Hair?” Women’s Studies Quarterly, 2006.