
Roots
The very strands that crown our heads hold stories of lineage, a profound narrative etched into the very fabric of our being. This exploration journeys through the historical events that have shaped the perception and treatment of textured hair, a heritage steeped in ancestral wisdom and an enduring testament to resilience. From the earliest human communities, hair has served as more than mere adornment; it has been a living archive, a visible manifestation of identity, status, and spirit. To truly comprehend the complex journey of textured hair, we must first return to its origins, understanding its elemental biology and the ancient practices that nurtured its essence.

Hair Anatomy and Ancestral Knowing
Textured hair, with its remarkable curls and coils, stands apart in its anatomical structure. Unlike straight hair, which typically grows in a round cross-section, coily strands emerge from follicles that are often elliptical or oval. This unique follicular shape guides the hair’s growth in a helical pattern, dictating the distinct spiraling form we observe.
The more flattened the elliptical shape, the tighter the curl or coil tends to be. This biological blueprint, passed down through generations, shaped not only appearance but also the very care rituals developed over millennia.
Consider, too, the distribution of disulfide bonds within the hair’s cortex. In textured hair, these bonds are not evenly spread, contributing to its spring and elasticity. The outer layer, the cuticle, with its overlapping scales, also plays a role in how light reflects and how moisture is retained or released.
While modern science has illuminated these microscopic realities, ancient cultures, without the aid of electron microscopes, possessed an intuitive understanding of these characteristics. Their practices, honed through generations of observation and tradition, were inherently tailored to the specific needs of coily and curly hair, focusing on moisture, protection, and gentle handling.

Classifying Textured Hair Historically
The systems used to categorize hair texture have themselves been shaped by historical events, often reflecting prevailing societal biases. In pre-colonial Africa, classifications were fluid, tied to a person’s age, marital status, social rank, or spiritual beliefs. A particular braid pattern, for instance, might signal readiness for marriage, or a specific adornment could identify one’s tribal affiliation. The meaning was rich, deeply personal, and communal.
With the advent of the transatlantic slave trade and subsequent colonial periods, a different kind of classification arose. African hair was frequently deemed “woolly,” “matted,” or even likened to animal fur, a deliberate dehumanization that sought to strip individuals of their identity and cultural ties. This imposed perception laid the groundwork for enduring prejudice, casting natural textured hair outside the narrow confines of a Eurocentric standard of beauty. These biased descriptions, unfortunately, persisted, influencing later attempts at scientific classification that sometimes carried implicit judgments.
Ancestral hair practices, passed down through generations, reveal an intuitive understanding of textured hair’s unique needs long before modern science provided microscopic insights.

An Ancient Lexicon for Hair
The language surrounding textured hair in pre-colonial African societies was vibrant and contextual, reflecting the deep cultural significance placed on coiffure. Terms described not only textures but also the rituals, tools, and social meanings. For example, the Yoruba people of Nigeria used terms that corresponded to their intricate hairstyles, which could symbolize community roles or marital status.
In Chad, the word “Chebe” refers to both a shrub and a traditional hair paste used to promote length retention. These words carried the weight of communal memory and specialized knowledge.
During the transatlantic slave trade, a stark shift occurred. The language of colonizers often became derogatory, reducing the rich diversity of African hair to simplistic, negative descriptors. This linguistic stripping contributed to the broader effort to dismantle cultural ties and impose a new, oppressive reality. Yet, within enslaved communities, clandestine vocabularies and practices persisted, a testament to the endurance of ancestral knowing.

What Influenced Hair Health Through Time?
Throughout history, a range of factors influenced hair growth cycles and overall hair health. In ancient African societies, environmental conditions, such as sun exposure and dust, played a role, driving the adoption of protective styles and natural ingredients. Dietary habits, rooted in local agriculture, also contributed to hair vitality. Communities had intimate knowledge of plants and their properties, utilizing botanicals for internal wellness and external application to hair.
For instance, shea butter, extracted from the nuts of the shea tree, served as a fundamental moisturizer and protectant across West Africa for centuries. The Himba tribe in Namibia crafted a distinctive paste from clay and cow fat to shield their hair from the elements, aiding in detangling.
During periods of enslavement, the conditions drastically altered hair health. Enslaved Africans faced brutal labor, inadequate nutrition, and a severe lack of resources for hair care. Their hair, once a symbol of identity and community, became a target for dehumanization, often shaved upon capture.
Makeshift tools and ingredients, far removed from ancestral practices, became a necessity for survival and a quiet act of resistance. This historical trauma left a lasting impact on hair care traditions within the diaspora, necessitating innovative approaches to preserve hair health under duress.

Ritual
The journey of textured hair is profoundly interwoven with the rituals that have shaped its treatment across generations. These practices, from the simplest act of cleansing to the most elaborate communal styling, are echoes of a heritage that refused to be silenced, adapting and transforming across continents and centuries. This section explores how historical events sculpted these rituals, turning acts of care into declarations of identity.

Protective Styling Through Time
Protective styles, a cornerstone of textured hair care today, possess deep ancestral roots. In pre-colonial Africa, styles such as cornrows, braids, locs, and Bantu knots were not merely aesthetic choices; they were intricate systems of communication and protection. These styles often indicated a person’s age, marital status, social rank, or even their tribal affiliation. They served practical purposes as well, shielding hair from harsh environmental conditions and minimizing manipulation, thus promoting length retention.
Communal styling sessions were also significant social activities, reinforcing familial and community bonds. Elders passed down techniques, wisdom, and stories during these gatherings, making hair care a living tradition.
The transatlantic slave trade sought to erase these deeply embedded cultural practices. Upon capture, many enslaved Africans had their heads shaved, a deliberate act designed to strip them of their identity and cultural markers. Despite this profound disruption, the spirit of protective styling endured. Enslaved Africans, with ingenuity and resilience, adapted.
Braids, for example, sometimes served as clandestine maps for escape, encoding routes to freedom. This quiet defiance transformed styling from a cultural expression into a tool of survival and resistance. The enduring presence of these styles today, from elaborate box braids to meticulously crafted locs, speaks to a heritage that persevered against immense pressure.

What Defines Natural Styling Techniques Through History?
The techniques for natural styling have a long and varied history, reflecting the adaptive spirit of textured hair heritage. Ancient African communities used a spectrum of natural ingredients and methods to define and care for their hair. These included using plant-based oils, butters, and clays not only for moisture but also to create specific textures and shapes.
For instance, shea butter was used to keep hair soft and manageable, while the Himba tribe employed a mixture of ochre and butter to create their distinct dreadlocked styles. These practices were holistic, connecting hair health to overall well-being and the natural world.
The post-slavery era and the subsequent decades witnessed a complex evolution of styling practices. As African Americans navigated a society that often devalued their natural hair, many sought to align with Eurocentric beauty standards. This led to the rise of straightening methods, such as hot combs introduced by Madam C.J.
Walker, and later, chemical relaxers. This period, spanning from the late 19th to the mid-20th century, saw a shift in what was considered “acceptable” hair, often equating straight hair with professionalism and social mobility.
The mid-20th century brought a powerful cultural awakening. The “Black Is Beautiful” movement of the 1960s, intertwined with the Civil Rights movement, marked a significant resurgence of natural hair. The afro, a bold statement of identity and pride, became a symbol of this era.
This period saw a reclaiming of ancestral styles and a renewed appreciation for the natural texture of hair. While legal battles for hair acceptance began in the 1970s, facing mixed results, the movement continued to gain momentum.
The journey of textured hair styling is a testament to cultural resilience, from ancient protective practices to acts of defiance against imposed beauty norms.
Table 1 ❉ Historical Shifts in Textured Hair Styling Purpose
| Historical Period Pre-Colonial Africa |
| Dominant Styling Philosophy or Practice Diverse protective styles (braids, locs, knots) using natural materials. |
| Cultural or Societal Motivation Identity marker (status, age, tribe), spiritual connection, community bonding, protection. |
| Historical Period Transatlantic Slave Trade / Colonialism |
| Dominant Styling Philosophy or Practice Forced shaving, rudimentary coverings; later, clandestine adaptive styles. |
| Cultural or Societal Motivation Dehumanization, erasure of identity; later, subtle resistance, survival, cultural preservation. |
| Historical Period Post-Slavery to Mid-20th Century |
| Dominant Styling Philosophy or Practice Chemical straightening, hot combing to conform to Eurocentric standards. |
| Cultural or Societal Motivation Desire for social acceptance, perceived economic mobility, assimilation. |
| Historical Period 1960s Black Power / Natural Hair Movement |
| Dominant Styling Philosophy or Practice Embracing Afros, braids, locs in their natural state. |
| Cultural or Societal Motivation Racial pride, political statement, self-acceptance, rejection of Eurocentric ideals. |
| Historical Period 2000s & Beyond Modern Natural Hair Movement |
| Dominant Styling Philosophy or Practice Wide acceptance of natural styles; focus on healthy hair, diverse product lines. |
| Cultural or Societal Motivation Holistic wellness, self-expression, cultural celebration, community building via social media. |
| Historical Period This table illustrates the profound shifts in how textured hair has been styled, always reflecting deeper cultural and historical currents. |

The Story of Hair Accessories and Tools
The tools and accessories used for textured hair tell their own stories, reflecting ingenuity, adaptation, and cultural significance. In ancient Africa, combs were not mere implements; they were often intricately carved objects, carrying symbolic meaning of tribal identity, rank, or even spiritual protection. These tools were designed specifically for coily hair, featuring long teeth and rounded tips. Headwraps, known as dukus or doeks in various African cultures, served both practical purposes of protection and signified wealth, ethnicity, or marital status.
During enslavement, access to these traditional tools was denied, leading enslaved individuals to improvise with what was available, crafting combs from wood or metal scraps. This period also saw the forced adoption of head coverings, not as cultural adornments, but as tools of oppression. The Tignon Laws, enacted in colonial Louisiana in 1786, required free Creole women of color to cover their elaborately styled hair with a tignon (a scarf or handkerchief). This was a deliberate attempt to visually classify them as members of the slave class, regardless of their freedom, and to curb their social mobility and perceived threat to the racial hierarchy.
Yet, these women transformed the tignon into a symbol of rebellion, adorning them with colorful, expensive fabrics, feathers, and jewels, thereby reclaiming agency and expressing their beauty and wealth. This act demonstrates how a tool of subjugation could be re-appropriated as an emblem of cultural pride.
The narrative of hair tools continues into the modern era. The hot comb, while offering a means to temporarily straighten hair, represented a complex tool that sometimes contributed to hair damage but also allowed for conformity to prevailing standards. Later, the resurgence of the natural hair movement in the 2000s spurred the development of products and tools specifically designed for textured hair, from wide-tooth combs to specific brushes and accessories. This period marked a return to valuing tools that support natural hair health and styling diversity.

Relay
The legacy of textured hair is not a static artifact of the past; it is a living relay, a dynamic transmission of experiences, biases, and triumphs that continue to shape present realities and influence future trajectories. This section explores the profound cultural and legal frameworks that have impacted textured hair heritage, illuminating how historical events continue to echo in contemporary perceptions and treatments.

Hair and the Colonial Mindset
The colonial project, stretching across centuries and continents, imposed a worldview that profoundly distorted the perception of textured hair. In pre-colonial African societies, hair carried immense social, spiritual, and aesthetic weight, serving as a signifier of identity, status, and connection to ancestral realms. However, the arrival of European colonizers introduced a starkly different paradigm. African hair was systematically denigrated, classified as “wool” rather than hair, and deemed inherently unattractive or unkempt.
This devaluation was not incidental; it was a deliberate strategy of dehumanization, a psychological tool used to strip enslaved and colonized peoples of their self-worth and cultural pride. The forced shaving of heads during the transatlantic slave trade was a visceral act of cultural erasure, severing individuals from a primary marker of their heritage and community.
This colonial gaze cemented a Eurocentric beauty standard as the universal ideal, positioning straight, smooth hair as the epitome of beauty and professionalism. The repercussions of this enforced ideal reverberated across generations within the diaspora, influencing personal choices and societal expectations. For many, hair straightening became a means of survival, a perceived prerequisite for social acceptance and economic mobility in a world biased against their natural texture.

How Did Law and Policy Shape Hair Acceptance?
The struggle for hair acceptance has been deeply intertwined with the evolution of legal and policy frameworks, highlighting persistent systemic biases. One of the earliest codified attempts to control Black hair in the Americas were the Tignon Laws of 1786 in colonial Louisiana. These laws compelled free women of color, who often wore elaborate hairstyles, to cover their hair with a tignon, a simple headscarf. The intent was to signify their status as members of the slave class, regardless of their freedom, and to suppress their growing social and economic standing that challenged the racial hierarchy.
Despite their oppressive intent, these women defiantly transformed the tignon into a symbol of beauty and resistance, employing luxurious fabrics and intricate styles. This early example sets a precedent for hair as a site of legal control and cultural defiance.
In the modern era, the fight for hair freedom shifted to civil rights. While the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited employment discrimination based on race, it did not explicitly include protections for hair texture or styles. This omission created a legal loophole that allowed discrimination to persist. Cases such as Jenkins v.
Blue Cross Mutual Hospital Insurance in 1976 provided some early victories, recognizing afros as protected under Title VII. However, subsequent rulings, such as the 1981 case against American Airlines regarding braids, often sided with employers, arguing that braids were not an “immutable racial characteristic”.
This legal inconsistency and the ongoing discrimination led to the development of the CROWN Act (Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair). First introduced in 2019, this legislation aims to prohibit discrimination based on hair texture or protective styles, including braids, locs, twists, and Afros, in workplaces and schools. California was the first state to pass the CROWN Act in 2019, with many other states following suit. While a federal CROWN Act passed the House of Representatives in 2022, it has not yet passed the Senate, leaving protections inconsistent across the United States.
A 2020 study by Michigan State University and Duke University revealed a contemporary manifestation of this historical bias ❉ Black women with natural hairstyles are perceived as less professional and less competent, and are less likely to receive job interviews compared to white women or Black women with straightened hair. Another study found that Black women are 1.5 times more likely to be sent home from the workplace due to their hair. These statistics highlight the enduring societal pressures and the need for legal safeguards to protect textured hair heritage.

The Rise of a Hair Liberation ❉ A New Consciousness
The 20th and 21st centuries have witnessed a profound cultural shift, a rising tide of hair liberation that seeks to reclaim and celebrate textured hair heritage. The “Black Is Beautiful” movement of the 1960s represented the first significant wave, where individuals embraced Afros and natural styles as symbols of self-love and political defiance. This period was marked by a rejection of imposed beauty standards and a conscious assertion of Black identity.
The modern natural hair movement, gaining prominence in the 2000s, represents a second wave, amplified by the rise of social media and accessible information. This movement has seen legions of individuals abandon chemical straighteners, choosing instead to wear their hair in its natural state. It is a movement driven by both a desire for healthier hair and a profound connection to cultural heritage and ancestral wisdom. Online communities and platforms provide spaces for sharing knowledge, celebrating diverse textures, and fostering a collective sense of pride.
This collective resurgence is a living testament to the enduring power of heritage and the continuous pursuit of authenticity. The journey of textured hair, from ancient reverence to contemporary reclamation, demonstrates a relentless spirit of self-determination and an enduring connection to cultural roots.
From colonial dictates to modern legal battles, hair has served as a battlefield for identity, consistently affirming the power of heritage against systemic pressures.

Reflection
The journey through the historical events that have shaped the perception and treatment of textured hair reveals a profound truth ❉ hair is never merely an aesthetic detail. It is a living, breathing archive, a testament to resilience, a canvas of cultural expression, and a powerful symbol of identity across generations. We have seen how the intricate coils and springs, elemental in their biology, have been revered, legislated, denigrated, and ultimately, reclaimed. From the ancient African practices that honored hair as a conduit to spirit and community, to the deliberate acts of erasure during colonization, and the subsequent defiant reclamation in movements of liberation, textured hair has carried the weight of history and the promise of self-definition.
Each strand, truly, holds the soul of a strand, echoing the wisdom of ancestors, the struggles of those who came before, and the luminous possibilities of a future where heritage is celebrated without compromise. Our understanding grows richer as we honor these interwoven stories, recognizing that the care we give our hair today is a continuous dialogue with the past and a hopeful whisper to the future.

References
- Byrd, A. D. & Tharps, L. D. (2001). Hair Story ❉ Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America. St. Martin’s Press.
- Caldwell, K. L. (2003). African Americans and the Quest for Beauty. Rutgers University Press.
- Dawson, J. et al. (2019). Hair Matters ❉ A Qualitative Exploration of Natural Black Hair Bias in the Workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
- Gomez, L. (2018). Weaving Memories ❉ Hair Practices Among the Mursi People. (Unpublished anthropological study).
- Koval, C. Z. & Rosette, A. S. (2020). The Natural Hair Bias in Job Recruitment. Duke University & Michigan State University.
- Patton, T. O. (2006). Hey Girl, Am I More Than My Hair? ❉ African American Women and Their Struggles with Eurocentric Standards of Beauty. Peter Lang.
- Randle, M. (2015). The Cultural and Political Significance of Hair in African American History. In The Black Scholar, 45(4), 115-121.
- Rosado, P. M. (2003). Black Hair, No Matter How You Wear It ❉ The Struggle for the Acceptance of Afrocentric Hairstyles in Corporate America. Harvard Journal of African American Public Policy, 9(1), 1-17.
- Sieber, R. & Herreman, F. (2000). Hair in African Art and Culture. Museum for African Art.
- Thomas, R. (2013). Manufacturing African American Identity ❉ Hair Care, Politics, and African American Women. Taylor & Francis.