
Roots
Imagine a time when the intricate coils and rich textures of hair were not just adornments, but living maps, sacred symbols, and vibrant journals of a people’s collective story. Before the shadows of transatlantic human trafficking stretched across the seas, hair for Black communities held a profound, intrinsic value, communicating lineage, social standing, age, and spiritual connection. It was a crown, tended with reverence, each twist and plait a deliberate act of cultural expression, a whisper of ancestral wisdom.
These traditional practices, born from a deep understanding of unique hair structures and their inherent needs, formed the very bedrock of textured hair heritage. Then, a sharp, disruptive force shattered this delicate balance, initiating actions that systematically sought to dismantle this very heritage, aiming to sever the deeply rooted bonds between Black people and their hair.
The journey into understanding the historical actions that targeted Black hair heritage begins not with oppression, but with an appreciation for what was. In pre-colonial African societies, hair was a language spoken through style. A woman’s braids could signify her marital status, a warrior’s sculpted coils might speak of his valor, and a child’s untouched scalp could herald a new beginning. Communities celebrated the diverse manifestations of textured hair, recognizing its intimate connection to identity, status, and spirit.
It was common practice for elders and skilled artisans to dedicate hours, sometimes days, to styling hair, transforming it into living art. These were not mere cosmetic exercises; they were communal rituals, fostering bonds and passing on knowledge across generations. The unique biology of textured hair, with its elliptical cross-section and helical growth pattern, lent itself to these diverse and often gravity-defying styles, each a testament to communal artistry and scientific understanding of its properties.
Hair in pre-colonial African societies was a profound visual language, communicating identity, status, and spiritual connection.

Ancestral Hair Anatomy and Its Reverence
The inherent qualities of textured hair, from its distinct curl patterns to its structural integrity, were deeply understood within ancestral contexts. Unlike straight hair, which tends to be round in cross-section, textured hair exhibits an elliptical or flat cross-section, causing it to coil and bend. This unique structure, alongside a varying distribution of disulfide bonds, contributes to its remarkable resilience and its capacity to hold complex styles. Ancient communities intuitively understood these biological realities, developing care rituals that respected the hair’s need for moisture and gentle handling.
They used natural oils, butters, and herbs harvested from their environments to nourish and protect, ensuring the hair remained supple and strong against the elements. This scientific understanding, passed down through oral traditions, formed the foundation of their hair care regimens. It was not merely about cleanliness; it was about honoring the hair’s living essence, a practice interwoven with spiritual beliefs that saw the head as a gateway to the divine.
The very terms used to describe hair in these societies reflected this deep reverence. While Western classification systems often reduce hair to a numerical type, pre-colonial African languages described hair with an array of words that spoke to its spiritual significance, its texture, its luster, and its role in communal life. These were not simply descriptors; they were affirmations of beauty and belonging. The respect shown to hair stylists, often high-ranking members of society, underscored the value placed on this aspect of personal and collective identity.

Early Efforts to Erase Heritage
The arrival of European slave traders marked a catastrophic turning point. The initial, brutal action targeting Black hair heritage was the systematic shaving of heads upon capture. This act, often masked under the guise of “sanitary reasons,” served a far more insidious purpose ❉ to strip enslaved Africans of their identity, sever their connection to their ancestral lands, and dismantle their communal bonds. When individuals were forcibly removed from their homes, they also lost access to the traditional tools, nourishing oils, and skilled hands that had always cared for their hair.
Their hair, once a source of pride and a marker of identity, became matted, tangled, and often neglected during the brutal Middle Passage and subsequent enslavement. This deliberate act of dehumanization was a foundational step in attempting to obliterate an entire people’s heritage, beginning with one of its most visible and sacred expressions.
This forced degradation of hair was an initial strategy in the broader project of racial subjugation. By devaluing and denying the inherent beauty and cultural significance of textured hair, enslavers sought to install a new, oppressive aesthetic standard. This imposition laid the groundwork for centuries of struggle, where the very appearance of Black hair became a site of contention, a battleground for identity and acceptance. The subtle and overt ways in which hair was targeted extended beyond the initial shaving, setting a precedent for ongoing discriminatory practices.

Ritual
The historical actions targeting Black hair heritage did not cease with the initial trauma of enslavement; they evolved into systemic pressures, legal mandates, and social norms that continually sought to suppress and redefine textured hair rituals. The forced migration disrupted established practices, yet the inherent human need for expression and connection ensured that ancestral knowledge, though fractured, persisted. Black people, with remarkable resilience, adapted and transformed their hair care rituals, often as acts of defiance and survival. These adaptations, sometimes born of necessity, sometimes of outright resistance, speak volumes about the deep-seated significance of hair within Black and mixed-race experiences.
In the aftermath of forced displacement, resources for traditional hair care were scarce. Enslaved individuals, without access to indigenous oils, combs, or the communal time for styling, had to improvise. They used what was available, sometimes rudimentary tools, and ingredients never intended for hair, such as animal fat or kerosene, to condition and attempt to manage their coils. This period also witnessed the emergence of new, hidden rituals.
For instance, cornrows, a style with roots in antiquity (dating back to 3500 BCE in Namibia), became a clandestine communication tool. Enslaved Africans braided maps to freedom into their hair, or concealed rice and seeds within their patterns, vital for survival if escape was achieved. These hidden practices were not merely about hygiene or aesthetics; they were life-sustaining rituals, testament to an unbreakable spirit.
Forced to adapt, enslaved communities turned hair rituals into clandestine acts of survival, braiding maps and seeds into their protective styles.

Legislated Control and Social Policing
As communities of color began to establish pockets of freedom, even minimal expressions of Black hair heritage were met with legislative backlash. A poignant illustration stands in the 18th-century Tignon Laws of Louisiana. Enacted in 1786, these laws required Black women, free or enslaved, to cover their hair with a tignon – a scarf or headdress – in public. The purported aim was to diminish the visibility and allure of Black women, whose elaborate and artful hairstyles, often adorned with jewels and feathers, were perceived as a challenge to the social hierarchy and a threat to white women’s status.
This legal mandate directly targeted a cultural practice, aiming to strip Black women of their public expression of self and heritage. However, the defiance was swift and creative ❉ Black women transformed the tignon itself into a statement, tying luxurious fabrics in sophisticated, eye-catching ways, turning an instrument of oppression into a symbol of pride and sartorial resistance.
Beyond legal statutes, society enforced unspoken rules. Post-slavery, European beauty standards became entrenched, equating straight hair and lighter skin with “civility” and “respectability”. This social policing led to internal shifts within Black communities, where the pursuit of “good hair” – hair that mimicked Eurocentric textures – became a perceived necessity for social acceptance and economic advancement.
The invention of the hot comb in the late 19th century and chemical relaxers in the early 20th century provided tools to achieve this desired straightness, creating a multi-billion dollar industry that capitalized on these imposed beauty norms. The weekly “press and curl” or relaxer application became a ritual for many Black women, often accompanied by physical discomfort and scalp damage, yet considered a gateway to opportunity.

The Tools of Imposed Beauty
The hot comb, a metal comb heated on a stove, allowed for temporary straightening, while chemical relaxers offered a more lasting alteration of the hair’s curl pattern. These products, though offering a perceived solution to societal pressures, often brought unintended consequences for hair health. The use of harsh chemicals, particularly lye-based relaxers, could lead to scalp burns, hair breakage, and even long-term damage to the hair follicle.
| Tool/Method Indigenous Oils and Butters |
| Historical Context/Purpose Pre-colonial African societies ❉ Used for nourishment, protection, and styling, reflecting a deep understanding of natural hair needs. |
| Impact on Hair Heritage Preserved hair health and traditional styling; largely lost access during enslavement. |
| Tool/Method Cornrows (as maps/storage) |
| Historical Context/Purpose Slavery era ❉ Secretly used to store seeds or map escape routes, leveraging a traditional style for survival. |
| Impact on Hair Heritage Act of cultural and personal resistance; transformed a cultural ritual into a tool for freedom. |
| Tool/Method Tignon Laws |
| Historical Context/Purpose 18th-century Louisiana ❉ Legal mandate requiring Black women to cover their hair in public. |
| Impact on Hair Heritage Attempted to suppress Black women's public expression and social status, but met with creative resistance. |
| Tool/Method Hot Comb |
| Historical Context/Purpose Late 19th/early 20th century ❉ Introduced to temporarily straighten textured hair. |
| Impact on Hair Heritage Offered a means to conform to Eurocentric beauty standards for perceived social and economic gain, despite potential damage. |
| Tool/Method Chemical Relaxers |
| Historical Context/Purpose Early 20th century onward ❉ Provided more permanent hair straightening. |
| Impact on Hair Heritage Further solidified Eurocentric beauty norms, often leading to hair and scalp health issues, while becoming a widely adopted beauty ritual. |
| Tool/Method These tools and mandates reveal a historical tension between ancestral heritage and imposed beauty ideals, shaping Black hair practices. |

Relay
The journey of Black hair heritage, scarred by historical actions, continues through a relay of systemic barriers and enduring resilience. The forces that sought to diminish textured hair did not simply vanish with the abolition of slavery or the repeal of specific laws. Instead, they adapted, manifesting in subtle biases and pervasive societal norms that persist even today. This continued struggle for acceptance, the fight for the right to wear one’s hair in its natural, inherited state, represents a profound connection to ancestral practices and a powerful statement of identity.
Consider the persistent narrative that equates textured hair with “unprofessionalism”. This belief, deeply rooted in the historical devaluing of Black physicality during slavery, has had concrete implications in education and employment. Black individuals have faced disciplinary actions in schools, been denied job opportunities, or even been sent home from work, simply for wearing natural hairstyles like afros, braids, twists, or locs. For example, a 2023 study found that Black Women’s Hair was 2.5 Times as Likely as White Women’s Hair to Be Perceived as “unprofessional”.
This same study revealed that 66% of Black women altered their hair for job interviews, with 41% straightening their curls. Such statistics paint a vivid picture of the continued pressure to conform, even at the cost of personal comfort and cultural authenticity.
Despite legislative strides, pervasive societal bias continues to associate textured hair with “unprofessionalism,” creating ongoing challenges for Black individuals.

Legal Landscapes of Hair Discrimination
For a long time, legal frameworks offered scant protection against hair discrimination. While the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited race-based discrimination, courts often interpreted this narrowly, failing to include protections against discrimination based on phenotypical traits like hair texture. This loophole meant that employers and schools could, in effect, engage in racial discrimination without direct legal consequence, often citing vague “grooming policies”.
The struggle for legal recognition gained momentum with high-profile cases. In 2010, Chastity Jones had a job offer rescinded because she refused to cut her locs, a case that garnered significant attention. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a lawsuit on her behalf, arguing that the company’s action stemmed from discriminatory stereotypes about Black hair.
Though her case was ultimately dismissed on appeal, it highlighted the urgent need for clearer legal protections. These legal battles paved the way for broader movements demanding change.
- Chastity Jones Case ❉ Job offer rescinded due to locs, sparking a legal battle over hair discrimination.
- Andrew Johnson Incident ❉ A high school wrestler forced to cut his locs to compete, drawing national outrage.
- Lara Odoffin Experience ❉ Job offer withdrawn due to braids in the UK, highlighting international reach of discrimination.

The Crown Act and Its Implications
A significant counter-movement against this historical targeting has been the CROWN Act (Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair). Initiated by a coalition including Dove and the Legislative Black Caucus, this legislation seeks to prohibit discrimination based on hair texture and protective styles commonly associated with race. California led the way in 2019, becoming the first state to sign the CROWN Act into law, with New York following soon after. The legislation specifically acknowledges that the nation’s history is “riddled with laws and societal norms that equated ‘blackness,’ and the associated physical traits, for example, dark skin, kinky and curly hair to a badge of inferiority”.
The CROWN Act represents a crucial step in dismantling centuries of prejudice. It affirms that the way Black people wear their hair is culturally meaningful and has no bearing on their professionalism or capability. As of late, while many states have adopted versions of the CROWN Act, a federal law remains elusive, meaning protections can vary by location. This ongoing legislative effort reflects the deep-seated nature of hair discrimination and the persistent fight to reclaim a heritage that was systematically undermined.
It signals a move towards a future where ancestral styles are not merely tolerated, but respected and celebrated in all spaces, a direct validation of the intrinsic beauty and cultural significance of textured hair. This legal progress, while incomplete, builds upon the foundational resistance demonstrated by those who defied the Tignon Laws centuries ago, proving that the relay of resilience continues.

Reflection
The chronicle of historical actions targeting Black hair heritage paints a complex picture, one of enduring struggle, but also of profound resilience. From the violent shearing of ancestral connections upon arrival on new, hostile shores, through the stifling mandates of tignon laws and the subtle, yet insidious, pressures of Eurocentric beauty standards, textured hair has stood as a silent, powerful witness. Each attempt to control, diminish, or redefine Black hair was, at its heart, an attempt to sever a living link to cultural memory, to selfhood, and to ancestral wisdom.
Yet, the very act of targeting this heritage only served to underscore its irreplaceable value. For within every coil and every curl, a history resides, a strength that defied erasure.
Roothea’s ethos, “Soul of a Strand,” truly finds its voice in this historical dialogue. It reminds us that understanding the past is not simply an academic pursuit; it is a vital act of self-care and communal healing. The knowledge of how hair was revered in pre-colonial societies, how it became a tool for clandestine communication during enslavement, and how it transformed into a symbol of Black Power and resistance in later eras, provides context for the contemporary journey of textured hair. Our modern care rituals, our celebrations of natural beauty, and our advocacy for hair freedom are all echoes of this continuous relay, a testament to those who, against immense odds, safeguarded the essence of Black hair heritage.
The path ahead involves recognizing that the remnants of these historical actions still cast long shadows, influencing perceptions and sometimes even internalizing biases. Yet, with each embracing of a natural curl, each confident display of a protective style, and each legal victory for hair freedom, we honor the fortitude of our forebears. The wisdom passed down through generations, the resilience coded within each strand, guides us toward a future where textured hair is universally recognized for its inherent beauty, its scientific marvel, and its sacred place in the collective consciousness. It is a living, breathing archive, perpetually reminding us of where we have been, and, more importantly, where we are going, unbound and radiant.

References
- Byrd, A. & Tharps, L. L. (2014). Hair Story ❉ Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America. St. Martin’s Griffin.
- Banks, I. (2000). Hair Matters ❉ Beauty, Power, and Black Women’s Consciousness. New York University Press.
- Hooks, b. (1995). Art, Bell Hooks on. Art on my Mind ❉ Visual Politics. The New Press.
- Powell, C. (2018). Bias, Employment Discrimination, and Black Women’s Hair ❉ Another Way Forward. BYU Law Review, 2018(3).
- Johnson, G. S. & Bankhead, C. L. (2014). From Nappy to Happy ❉ A History of Black Hair, Identity, and Culture. Journal of Black Studies, 45(4).
- Patton, T. O. (2006). African American Women and Hair ❉ Is It More Than Just Hair? National Social Science Journal, 26(1).
- Thompson, C. O. (2008). Black Women and Identity ❉ A Literary and Cultural Study. Routledge.
- Onwuachi-Willig, A. (2017). The CROWN Act ❉ Protecting Black Women’s Hair. Yale Law & Policy Review, 36(1).