
Roots
The strands that crown our heads, particularly those with the rich, coiled textures inherited across generations, hold far more than mere biological composition. They are living archives, whispering stories of ancient lands, enduring resilience, and cultural legacy. For centuries, across continents, hair has been a potent symbol, a canvas for identity, status, and spiritual connection. To truly appreciate the journey of textured hair, and indeed, the significance of modern legislation such as the CROWN Act, we must reach back into the deep well of ancestral practices that shaped its meaning long before the contemporary world sought to define it.

Textured Hair as a Historical Record
Consider the earliest expressions of humanity’s relationship with hair, particularly within African societies. Far from simple adornment, hair styles served as an eloquent, nonverbal language. They could declare one’s marital status, age, ethnic affiliation, or even one’s standing within a community.
In ancient Egypt, hairstyles indicated social standing and religious belief, with wigs and braids signifying wealth and devotion. Archaeological evidence, such as intricate beadwork found at sites like Kerma in Sudan, points to a long history of hair serving as a medium for artistic expression.
In many pre-colonial African societies, hair was considered the body’s most elevated part, literally the closest point to the heavens, a conduit for spiritual interaction and a source of power. This reverence meant that hair care rituals were deeply communal and often held spiritual significance. The act of tending to hair, whether washing, oiling, braiding, or twisting, frequently involved familial bonds, passed down from mothers to daughters, reinforcing social cohesion. These practices instilled a collective understanding of hair as a sacred aspect of self, intrinsically tied to one’s spiritual well-being and ancestral lineage.
Hair, across various ancestral cultures, served as a profound nonverbal language, communicating identity, social standing, and spiritual connection.

The Anatomy of Heritage
From a scientific perspective, textured hair possesses unique structural characteristics that differentiate it from straighter hair types. The elliptical shape of the hair follicle, a hallmark of coily and curly hair, contributes to its natural inclination to curl and coil. This inherent characteristic, shaped over millennia within diverse populations, has always been part of its heritage. The tightly coiled nature can make it more prone to dryness and breakage, a reality that ancestral care practices intuitively addressed through the consistent use of natural oils and butters.
Understanding the biological foundations of textured hair allows us to appreciate the ingenuity of these historical care methods. The very architecture of a single strand, with its outermost cuticle layer, acts as a shield. Traditional ingredients, often locally sourced, were not chosen arbitrarily; they were selected for their ability to seal moisture, provide nourishment, and protect this delicate structure, ensuring hair health and resilience in various climates.
| Historical Cultural Markers Tribal Affiliation ❉ Specific braid patterns indicated belonging to a particular community or ethnic group. |
| Contemporary Hair Classification (Example) Hair Type System ❉ A numerical and letter-based system (e.g. 4C, 3B) categorizes curl patterns for product recommendations. |
| Historical Cultural Markers Social Standing ❉ Elaborate styles often denoted wealth or a higher place in society. |
| Contemporary Hair Classification (Example) Porosity Level ❉ Scientific measurement of how well hair absorbs and retains moisture. |
| Historical Cultural Markers Marital Status/Age ❉ Certain styles marked readiness for marriage or life stages. |
| Contemporary Hair Classification (Example) Density ❉ Measures the number of individual hair strands on the scalp. |
| Historical Cultural Markers The ancient wisdom of cultural hair identification finds a parallel in modern attempts to understand hair's unique characteristics. |

The Lexicon of Black Hair History
The language we use to speak of textured hair is also steeped in heritage. Terms like Cornrows, Locs, Bantu Knots, and Afros are not merely descriptions of styles; they are names that carry the weight of centuries of cultural expression, resilience, and even resistance. These terms represent distinct ancestral practices, each with its own lineage and significance. Cornrows, dating back to 3000 BCE in Africa, were often used to communicate tribal affiliation and status.
Dreadlocks, or locs, have a long history in Africa, with evidence of their presence as early as 500 BCE among Ethiopian Coptic Orthodox Church priests. Bantu knots can be traced to the 2nd millennium BCE, originating from the Bantu-speaking communities of Southern West Africa. These names, originating from African traditions, are woven into the very fabric of Black hair identity.
The connection between these ancestral practices and the CROWN Act becomes clearer when we consider the historical suppression of these very styles. As Africans were forcibly displaced during the transatlantic slave trade, their hair became a site of profound dehumanization and cultural stripping. Slave traders often shaved heads, erasing visual markers of identity and connection to homeland. Later, in the diaspora, efforts to police Black hair continued, culminating in laws such as the Tignon Laws of 1786 in Spanish colonial Louisiana.
These laws compelled free women of color, whose elaborate hairstyles often drew admiration and challenged social hierarchies, to cover their hair with headscarves, or tignons. The CROWN Act, passed by many states and cities, directly counters this historical pattern of hair-based discrimination by legally protecting the right to wear these ancestrally linked styles.

Ritual
The rituals surrounding textured hair care are not merely a sequence of steps; they are a living testament to ancestral wisdom, passed down through generations. These practices, honed over centuries, represent a deep understanding of hair’s unique characteristics and a profound respect for its place in individual and communal identity. The CROWN Act, in its legislative reach, now guards the right to practice these rituals freely, without fear of professional or academic reprisal, thus honoring a long-standing heritage.

The Protective Veil of Styling Heritage
Protective styles, such as braids, twists, and locs, represent more than aesthetic choices. They are ancient techniques, born from a deep connection to the environment and a need to preserve hair health, particularly in challenging climates. These styles, prevalent throughout Africa, served practical purposes ❉ safeguarding hair from sun, dust, and breakage, while also acting as cultural identifiers. The ingenuity of these styles lies in their ability to minimize manipulation of the hair strand, allowing it to rest and retain moisture.
The process of creating these styles often involved communal gatherings, reinforcing social bonds. For instance, the act of braiding was, and continues to be, a deeply intimate and social experience, fostering connections among family and friends. These sessions frequently served as spaces for storytelling, sharing wisdom, and passing down cultural knowledge, making the styling process a vital part of cultural transmission. This communal aspect of hair care speaks to a collective heritage of support and shared identity.
Ancestral hair rituals are living archives of cultural knowledge and communal connection, sustained through generations.

Woven Stories and Modern Echoes
The historical presence of wigs and hair extensions also has a rich, though sometimes complex, heritage. In ancient Egypt, elaborate wigs, often made from human hair or plant fibers, were symbols of status and religious devotion. These adornments were not merely superficial; they played a role in ceremonies and conveyed societal standing. The concept of adding to or altering one’s hair for various purposes has deep roots.
Today, wigs and extensions continue to be a significant part of textured hair styling, offering versatility and protective benefits. They serve as a modern manifestation of an ancient practice of hair adornment and transformation. However, the context has shifted.
While historically used to signify status or for ritualistic purposes, in the diaspora, they sometimes became a means to conform to Eurocentric beauty standards, especially during periods when natural hair was stigmatized. The CROWN Act, by protecting natural styles, provides a choice, allowing individuals to choose styling options rooted in heritage or personal preference without facing discrimination.
| Ancestral Styling Techniques Braiding and Plaiting ❉ Used for identification, status, spiritual connection, and hair preservation. |
| Contemporary Relevance (Post-CROWN Act Context) Protective Styling ❉ Continues to protect hair and serve as a cultural expression, now legally protected in many jurisdictions. |
| Ancestral Styling Techniques Threading/Wrapping ❉ Techniques like 'Irun Kiko' (Yoruba) used for intricate styles and signifying life stages. |
| Contemporary Relevance (Post-CROWN Act Context) Low-Manipulation Styling ❉ Valued for minimizing breakage and promoting length retention. |
| Ancestral Styling Techniques Oiling and Adorning ❉ Use of natural butters, herbs, and powders for moisture and decoration with beads, shells. |
| Contemporary Relevance (Post-CROWN Act Context) Focus on Scalp Health ❉ Emphasis on nourishing scalp and strands with natural oils and butters for overall hair wellness. |
| Ancestral Styling Techniques The enduring legacy of ancestral styling practices reinforces their continued importance in textured hair care and identity today. |

Heat and the Historical Imperative
The history of textured hair also includes the use of heat for straightening, a practice that gained prominence in the diaspora, especially during the 19th and 20th centuries. The invention of the hot comb and later chemical relaxers offered methods to achieve straight hair, often driven by societal pressures to conform to Eurocentric beauty standards. This period reflects a painful chapter in hair history, where the inherent texture of Black hair was often deemed “unprofessional” or “unkempt”. The psychological impact of these external pressures, and the physical toll on hair from chemical treatments, highlights the deep-seated biases that necessitated the CROWN Act.
The CROWN Act acknowledges this historical struggle by defining racial discrimination to include traits historically associated with race, including hair texture and styles such as braids, locs, twists, and Afros. This legal framework allows individuals to choose their styling methods, whether traditionally rooted or modern, without facing the burden of discrimination, thereby reclaiming agency over their hair and identity. The movement towards natural hair, spurred by the “Black Is Beautiful” movement of the 1960s and its second wave in the 2000s, directly challenged these imposed beauty standards, asserting the inherent beauty and acceptability of textured hair in its natural state.

Relay
The journey of textured hair identity, from ancient reverence to contemporary legal protection, embodies a powerful relay of heritage. Each generation has carried the torch of cultural memory, adapting ancestral practices and pushing back against oppressive norms, ultimately culminating in the CROWN Act’s assertion of dignity and acceptance. This legislative measure, while modern, is deeply rooted in the historical struggle for the right to self-expression and cultural affirmation.

The Living Library of Regimens and Rituals
Ancestral care regimens for textured hair were a holistic endeavor, integrating physical care with spiritual and communal well-being. These practices were not isolated; they were interwoven with daily life, seasonal changes, and significant life events. Communities utilized ingredients sourced from their immediate environment, such as shea butter, palm oil, and various herbs, understanding their properties through generations of empirical observation. The consistent application of these natural elements speaks to an intuitive, scientific understanding of moisture retention and hair health that predates modern chemistry.
Consider the practices of the Himba tribe in Namibia, who traditionally use a red ochre paste called Otjize, a blend of butterfat and ochre, to coat their hair. This practice is not only a cultural symbol but also provides practical protection against the harsh sun and insects, showcasing a sophisticated, ancestrally informed approach to hair care in specific environmental contexts. Similarly, the meticulous and time-consuming processes of braiding, often taking hours or days, served to impart not only a style but also deep care and communal bonding.
The CROWN Act stands as a vital legal recognition, protecting the cultural legacy of textured hair and challenging centuries of discrimination.

Nighttime Sanctuaries and Bonnet Wisdom?
The emphasis on nighttime protection for textured hair has a long, if perhaps less documented, lineage within ancestral care. While the modern bonnet may be a relatively recent invention, the concept of preserving hairstyles and hair health during sleep likely existed in various forms, perhaps through specific wrapping techniques or materials. The vulnerability of textured hair to tangling and dryness, especially during sleep, would have been understood implicitly by those who tended to it daily.
The modern bonnet, headscarf, or silk pillowcase extends this ancestral wisdom into contemporary practice. These accessories protect delicate strands from friction and moisture loss, preserving style and promoting health. The wisdom embedded in these nightly rituals speaks to a continuity of care, where ancient understanding of hair’s fragility informs present-day protection. This unbroken chain of knowledge connects the earliest wrapping traditions to the modern-day bonnet, highlighting a persistent dedication to maintaining textured hair’s vitality.
A powerful historical example that illuminates the connection between ancestral practices, textured hair heritage, and the necessity of the CROWN Act is the Tignon Laws of 1786 in Spanish Colonial Louisiana. This legislation mandated that free women of color, known for their elaborate and distinctive hairstyles adorned with jewels and feathers, cover their hair with a tignon or headscarf when in public. The law’s purpose was to visibly distinguish these women from white women and to suppress their perceived influence and attractiveness, thereby reinforcing racial and social hierarchies. This historical instance clearly demonstrates a deliberate attempt to police and diminish Black women’s identity through the regulation of their hair.
The resilience of these women, who responded by transforming the mandated tignons into elaborate, colorful, and ornate headwraps, turning a symbol of oppression into one of distinction and resistance, speaks volumes about the enduring spirit of self-expression within the heritage of Black hair. The CROWN Act, by protecting styles like braids, locs, and twists, directly counters this historical precedent, asserting the legal right to wear culturally significant hairstyles without facing discrimination, and thereby validates the centuries-long fight for hair autonomy.

The Interplay of Identity and Legislation ❉ What does the CROWN Act Truly Protect?
The CROWN Act, an acronym for “Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair,” was first introduced in California in 2019 and has since been adopted by many states and cities across the United States. Its core purpose is to prohibit discrimination based on hair texture and protective hairstyles commonly associated with race, such as braids, locs, twists, and Bantu knots, in educational and employment settings. The legislation addresses a historical and ongoing issue ❉ discrimination against Black individuals based on their hair, often rooted in Eurocentric beauty standards that deem natural Black hair as “unprofessional”.
A 2023 CROWN Workplace Research Study found that Black women’s hair is 2.5 times as likely as white women’s hair to be perceived as “unprofessional”. This same study revealed that approximately two-thirds (66%) of Black women change their hair for a job interview, with 41% changing from curly to straight. Over 20% of Black women aged 25-34 have been sent home from their jobs due to their hair.
These statistics underscore the pervasive and systemic nature of hair discrimination and its direct impact on Black women’s economic opportunities and well-being. The CROWN Act directly challenges these discriminatory practices by legally affirming that hair texture and protective styles are inextricably linked to racial identity and therefore deserve protection under civil rights laws.
The Act’s significance extends beyond legal protection; it serves as a powerful statement of cultural affirmation. It legitimizes ancestral hair practices that have long been marginalized, recognizing them not as mere trends but as intrinsic elements of Black and mixed-race heritage. The movement to pass the CROWN Act is gaining momentum, reflecting a broader societal shift towards valuing diversity and dismantling discriminatory norms that have historically constrained self-expression.
- Protection of Natural Styles ❉ The CROWN Act explicitly shields individuals from discrimination based on hair texture and protective styles like Braids, Locs, Twists, and Afros.
- Addressing Systemic Bias ❉ The law confronts deeply ingrained biases that often deem natural Black hair as “unprofessional” in academic and workplace settings.
- Cultural Affirmation ❉ It provides legal recognition and validation for hair practices that are central to Black and mixed-race identity and heritage.

Holistic Influences and the Legacy of Wellness
Ancestral wellness philosophies often viewed the body, mind, and spirit as interconnected, and hair health was no exception. Practices were not isolated to topical applications but encompassed a broader approach to well-being. This perspective suggests that stress, diet, and spiritual harmony all played a role in hair’s vitality. The communal aspect of hair care, for instance, offered social support and reduced isolation, contributing to overall mental and emotional wellness.
The CROWN Act, in its own way, contributes to this holistic wellness. By alleviating the psychological burden of hair discrimination, it supports mental and emotional well-being. The constant pressure to conform, to alter one’s hair to fit narrow beauty standards, creates stress and diminishes self-esteem.
Legal protection allows individuals to experience greater peace of mind, embracing their natural hair without fear of negative consequences, thus promoting a more authentic and whole sense of self. This aligns with ancestral wisdom that valued inner harmony as much as outer appearance.

Reflection
The journey of textured hair identity is a timeless echo, a living narrative that traverses ancestral plains, endures periods of suppression, and ultimately reclaims its rightful place in the world. Each coil, every kink, every intricate braid tells a story of survival, creativity, and profound connection to a rich cultural heritage. The passage of the CROWN Act in various states marks a significant, yet continuing, chapter in this narrative. It is a legislative recognition of what our ancestors knew instinctively ❉ that hair is more than mere keratin and pigment; it is a profound extension of self, identity, and collective memory.
This legislation does not create new rights so much as it reaffirms ancient ones, protecting the freedom to express one’s heritage through the very crown of one’s head. It allows the tender thread of ancestral care, the vibrant art of traditional styling, and the deep science of textured hair to continue their relay across generations, unburdened by prejudice. As we move forward, the spirit of Roothea’s ‘Soul of a Strand’ ethos calls us to honor this ongoing legacy, ensuring that the wisdom whispered through centuries of hair traditions continues to flourish, a testament to resilience and an ever-unfolding story of identity. Our textured strands remain a beautiful, living archive, forever connected to the source, forever unbound.

References
- Arnoldi, Mary Jo, and Christine Mullen Kreamer. Cloth That Does Not Die ❉ The Woven Art of Africa. Smithsonian National Museum of African Art, 1995.
- Duke, Ashleigh. “Beauty in the Eye of the Beholder ❉ The Impact of Hairstyle on Professionalism and Competence Perceptions for Black Women.” Journal of Management Inquiry, 2020.
- Evelyn, Kenya. “Texas Teen Barred from Graduation for Dreadlocks after School Policy Change.” The Guardian, January 2020.
- Gould, Elise, and Lauren deCourcy. “Black Women’s Wages ❉ A Summary of Earnings in 2022.” Economic Policy Institute, July 2023.
- Locke, Michelle. “Girl, 9, Sent Home From School for Curly Hair ❉ ‘She Feels Like She’s Not as Pretty as Other Girls.’” Essence, April 2022.
- NAACP Legal Defense Fund. “The CROWN Act.” Accessed June 13, 2025.
- Patton, Tracey Owens. “Hey Girl, Am I More Than My Hair? African American Women and Their Hair.” Journal of Black Studies, vol. 40, no. 5, 2010, pp. 605-620.
- Sieber, Roy, and Frank Herreman. Hair in African Art and Culture. Museum for African Art, 2000.
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. “EEOC Files Lawsuit against Catastrophe Management Solutions for Race Discrimination.” Press Release, September 2013.
- U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 2021 .
- Dove and LinkedIn. 2023 CROWN Workplace Research Study. 2023.