
Roots
There exists a profound truth whispered through generations, carried in the very coil and curve of a strand ❉ our hair is a living archive. It holds not merely the stories of our individual days but the vast chronicles of those who came before us, a testament to ancient wisdom and enduring spirit. To speak of the CROWN Act, then, is not to discuss a modern legal construct in isolation. It means journeying back through the ancestral practices it safeguards, understanding the deep heritage etched into every curl, every loc, every braid.
What ancestral hair practices does the CROWN Act protect? It guards the right to wear one’s history openly, without penalty, ensuring that the legacy of textured hair, for so long policed and misunderstood, can flourish in its rightful place of honor.

A Genetic Tapestry of Coils and Kinks
The architecture of textured hair, from the tightest coil to the softest wave, is a marvel of biological design. Unlike straight hair, which typically grows in a circular or oval cross-section, hair with significant texture emerges from follicles that are often elliptical, creating the characteristic curvature along the hair shaft. This unique structure, with its many bends and turns, influences how moisture travels along the strand, how light reflects from its surface, and how it interacts with its environment.
Our ancestral kin, with their intuitive understanding of the earth and its offerings, recognized this inherent nature. They developed ingenious methods of care that worked in concert with the hair’s design, rather than against it.
Consider the very biology of our hair. The outermost layer, the cuticle, is like a shingled roof, protecting the inner cortex and medulla. On highly textured hair, these shingles may not lie as flat as on straight hair, creating points of vulnerability if not properly nurtured.
This fundamental difference underlies the centuries-old emphasis on moisture, protection, and gentle manipulation in traditional Black and mixed-race hair care. It is a biological blueprint that speaks to the ancestral imperative of careful stewardship.

What is the Elemental Structure of Ancestral Hair?
The CROWN Act stands as a sentinel over styles born from this very biological reality, styles that reflect a deep understanding of how to manage and protect textured hair. These styles are not arbitrary choices; they are often deeply rooted in practical necessity and cultural expression. When we look at the intricate patterns of cornrows, the majestic rise of an Afro, or the steady progression of Locs, we are seeing the direct application of ancestral knowledge about the hair’s inherent tendencies.
Each strand, regardless of its curl pattern, shares common microscopic elements ❉ the cuticle, cortex, and medulla. Yet, in textured hair, the distribution of disulfide bonds within the cortex, the very building blocks of the hair’s shape, contributes to its specific curvature. This curvature, repeated along thousands of strands, creates the volume and resilience that characterize Black and mixed-race hair. The ancestral practices were often direct responses to these inherent characteristics, aimed at preserving integrity and promoting growth.

Traditional Classifications and Hidden Biases
For generations, the nuanced spectrum of textured hair was understood through lived experience and communal knowledge, often without the need for formal systems. In pre-colonial African societies, hair styling was a language in itself, indicating social status, tribal affiliation, age, and spiritual standing. The specific techniques and their names were passed down, reflecting a deeply embedded cultural lexicon. However, with the advent of colonization and the transatlantic slave trade, external classification systems began to emerge, often imbued with biases that devalued natural textures.
The CROWN Act seeks to dismantle the remnants of such biased perceptions. It confronts the historical tendency to label coils and kinks as “unkempt” or “unprofessional,” terms that have no basis in the hair’s actual cleanliness or inherent quality. Instead, these labels serve as proxies for racial discrimination, forcing individuals to conform to Eurocentric beauty standards. The Act acknowledges that a person’s natural hair, and the styles that honor its nature, are intrinsic to their racial identity and heritage.
The CROWN Act acts as a shield, protecting the ancestral memory woven into the coils and patterns of textured hair from discriminatory practices.
| Aspect of Hair Hair as Identity |
| Ancestral Understanding A profound symbol of tribe, status, age, spirituality, and community connection. |
| Colonial/Eurocentric Imposition A marker to be controlled, shorn, or straightened for assimilation. |
| Aspect of Hair Hair Health Focus |
| Ancestral Understanding Emphasis on moisture retention, protection, and natural ingredients. |
| Colonial/Eurocentric Imposition Pressure to achieve straightness, often through damaging chemical processes. |
| Aspect of Hair Hair Texture Perception |
| Ancestral Understanding Celebrated for its unique forms and versatility for protective styles. |
| Colonial/Eurocentric Imposition Deemed "unprofessional" or "unkempt," leading to systemic discrimination. |
| Aspect of Hair This table highlights the stark contrast between deeply rooted ancestral respect for textured hair and the damaging narratives imposed through historical oppression, which the CROWN Act aims to rectify. |

Ritual
The threads of heritage, though sometimes strained by history, hold firm through ritual. Ancestral hair practices were more than just styling; they were acts of communal bonding, expressions of artistic prowess, and profound statements of cultural continuity. What ancestral hair practices does the CROWN Act protect, in the realm of ritual? It safeguards the living performance of these traditions, from the rhythmic parting of sections to the skilled intertwining of strands, recognizing their inherent worth beyond mere aesthetic appeal.

The Living Encyclopedia of Protective Styles
Among the ancestral practices most overtly shielded by the CROWN Act are the multitude of Protective Styles. These styles, including Braids, Twists, Locs, and Bantu Knots, served ancient communities by safeguarding the hair from environmental elements, reducing breakage, and promoting growth. They were born from a practical wisdom—a deep understanding of how to manage and preserve textured hair’s delicate nature, particularly its propensity for dryness and tangling. From the intricate cornrows of ancient Ethiopia to the majestic locs worn across the African continent, these styles carried profound social and spiritual meanings, often communicating a person’s marital status, age, or tribal affiliation.
The CROWN Act explicitly names many of these styles, offering a legal bulwark against their dismissal as “unprofessional” in schools and workplaces. This recognition validates not only the styles themselves but the generations of skilled hands and communal spaces where these rituals were, and continue to be, performed. These are not passing fads; they are cultural mainstays, honed over millennia.

What is the Deep Heritage of Braiding Techniques?
Braiding, in its myriad forms, stands as a cornerstone of Black hair heritage. Documented as early as 3000 BCE in ancient Egypt, braiding techniques were central to various West African societies like the Yoruba, Wolof, and Fulani. Each tribe often possessed distinct patterns, conveying specific social signals.
For instance, the Yoruba people of Nigeria created intricate patterns that were not merely decorative but held deep spiritual significance, often crafted by highly respected braiders. This practice was a communal affair, mothers, daughters, and friends gathering to intertwine strands, thereby strengthening family and community bonds while preserving cultural identity.
During the harrowing period of the transatlantic slave trade, these practices took on new, heartbreaking significance. Enslaved Africans, stripped of their overt cultural markers, found subversive power in their hair. Braids became silent maps to freedom, intricate patterns used to communicate escape routes, or even to hide rice seeds and beans for survival during arduous journeys. This history underscores the profound resilience embedded in these hair practices, transforming them from mere adornment into symbols of resistance and survival.

Hair as Communication and Community
Beyond the physical protection, ancestral hair practices were deeply communal. The act of styling hair was often a shared experience, a time for storytelling, intergenerational teaching, and the strengthening of social ties. These traditions provided a space for cultural transmission, where younger generations learned not only the techniques but also the deeper meanings and histories associated with each style. The rhythmic motions of braiding, the quiet focus of coiling, the shared laughter and conversation—these elements formed a living social fabric.
Even today, for many Black and mixed-race individuals, a visit to the hair stylist or a communal braiding session with family carries echoes of these ancient gatherings. It is a moment of care, connection, and affirmation of identity. The CROWN Act, by safeguarding the right to wear these styles, implicitly protects these vital spaces of cultural expression and communal practice.
- Cornrows ❉ Intricate patterns braided close to the scalp, originating in various African societies and used for identity, social status, and even communication during enslavement.
- Locs ❉ Freeform or cultivated strands of hair that coil and interlock, often associated with spiritual beliefs and a symbol of standing firm in one’s heritage.
- Bantu Knots ❉ A protective style where sections of hair are twisted and coiled tightly to form small knots, with roots tracing back to the Bantu-speaking communities of Africa.

Relay
The transmission of ancestral wisdom, often a silent and steady current, finds powerful voice in the contemporary landscape through legislation like the CROWN Act. This act is not merely a legal decree; it is a recognition of the intergenerational relay of cultural practices and a stand against the historical erasure of Black and mixed-race identity. How does the CROWN Act ensure the continuity of our textured hair heritage? It provides a framework for dignity, allowing the echoes of ancient care rituals to resonate in modern spaces without fear of prejudice.

Sustaining Ancestral Regimens in a Modern World
Ancestral hair care regimens were intrinsically tied to the natural resources available and a holistic understanding of well-being. Ingredients like Shea Butter, Coconut Oil, and Aloe Vera were not just topical applications; they were seen as gifts from the earth, imbued with restorative properties. The Chadian practice of using Chébé Powder, derived from the seeds of the chébé plant, illustrates a specialized ancestral approach to length retention and hair health, often mixed with moisturizing substances and applied with deep intention. These traditions prioritize scalp health, moisture, and gentle treatment, insights that modern hair science often validates.
The CROWN Act’s protections for styles such as locs, braids, and twists indirectly support these ancestral regimens. These styles are often chosen precisely because they are protective, allowing hair to rest, retain moisture, and grow without constant manipulation or exposure to harsh elements. This practical aspect connects directly to the historical emphasis on preserving the integrity of textured hair, a heritage of care that prioritizes health over conformity to external standards.
The CROWN Act bridges the wisdom of ancient hair care rituals with the necessity for contemporary protections against deeply rooted biases.

Addressing the Historical Weight of Discrimination
The need for the CROWN Act springs directly from a painful historical reality ❉ the systematic policing of Black hair. From the forced shaving of heads during the transatlantic slave trade, a deliberate act to strip identity and heritage, to the ongoing pressures to conform to Eurocentric beauty standards, Black hair has been a site of struggle and resilience. The CROWN Act acknowledges that discrimination against natural hair and protective styles is a manifestation of racial bias, often used as a proxy for anti-Blackness in schools and workplaces.
Consider the stark realities faced by Black individuals ❉ a 2019 Dove study revealed that Black Women are 30% More Likely to Be Subjected to Strict Grooming Policies and Subsequently Sent Home from Work Due to Their Hairstyles compared to their white counterparts (Dove, 2019). This statistic illuminates the systemic disadvantage and the very real consequences of hair discrimination. Such policies, masquerading as neutral grooming standards, disproportionately affect Black men, women, and children, perpetuating cultural and racial discrimination. The CROWN Act directly challenges these discriminatory practices by legally defining hair texture and protective styles as attributes of race, thereby extending civil rights protections.

How Does the CROWN Act Counter Historical Prejudice?
The legislation explicitly covers styles like Afros, Locs, Braids, Twists, and Bantu Knots, recognizing them as integral to Black identity and heritage. This legal recognition counters centuries of implicit and explicit messages that deemed these styles “unprofessional” or “unclean,” forcing individuals to chemically straighten their hair or wear wigs to avoid penalization. The case of Chastity Jones, who in 2010 had a job offer rescinded because she refused to cut her dreadlocks, stands as a stark example of the very discrimination the CROWN Act seeks to prevent (Clayton, 2024).
Although her initial claim of racial discrimination was not upheld by the 11th Circuit, which stated that Title VII protected immutable characteristics, not cultural practices, this case galvanized the movement for the CROWN Act, highlighting the critical need for explicit protections for textured hair styles. The Act redefines race to include traits associated with hair, closing this legal loophole.
The Act also plays a significant role in promoting educational equality. Policies prohibiting natural hairstyles in schools have resulted in Black students being suspended or expelled, disrupting their education. The CROWN Act works to dismantle these barriers, ensuring that children can attend school without having to sacrifice their cultural identity or face disciplinary action due to their hair. It cultivates an environment where all students can feel seen, valued, and respected for who they are, including the heritage they carry on their heads.
- Legal Redefinition ❉ Expands the legal definition of “race” to include hair texture and styles historically associated with racial identity.
- Protective Scope ❉ Specifically lists afros, braids, locs, twists, and Bantu knots as protected styles.
- Anti-Discrimination ❉ Prohibits discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations, and education based on these protected hairstyles.
| Protected Hairstyle Braids (e.g. Cornrows, Box Braids) |
| Ancestral/Cultural Origin Ancient Egypt (3000 BCE), West African societies like Yoruba, Fulani. |
| Heritage Significance Identity marker, social status, spiritual meaning, means of communication/survival during enslavement. |
| Protected Hairstyle Locs (Dreadlocks) |
| Ancestral/Cultural Origin Ancient origins across various cultures, including Africa. |
| Heritage Significance Symbol of identity, spiritual connection, resilience, self-expression. |
| Protected Hairstyle Twists |
| Ancestral/Cultural Origin Pre-colonial African societies. |
| Heritage Significance Protective style, signifying tribe, status, family background. |
| Protected Hairstyle Afro |
| Ancestral/Cultural Origin Naturally occurring textured hair, gaining prominence during Civil Rights Movement. |
| Heritage Significance Symbol of Black pride, resistance against Eurocentric norms, unity. |
| Protected Hairstyle Bantu Knots |
| Ancestral/Cultural Origin Traced to Bantu-speaking communities in Africa (2nd millennium BCE). |
| Heritage Significance Cultural identity, protective styling. |
| Protected Hairstyle The CROWN Act's protection extends to these styles, recognizing their deep roots in Black and mixed-race heritage and their historical role in cultural identity. |

Reflection
To walk with textured hair, in its myriad forms, is to carry a legacy. It is to wear a living crown, intricately tied to the stories of resilience, creativity, and profound cultural wisdom spanning millennia. The journey of Black and mixed-race hair, from ancient communal rituals to modern legislative battles, reflects a continuous striving for self-definition and affirmation in a world often too quick to dismiss or devalue that which it does not understand. The CROWN Act stands as a beacon in this journey, not as an endpoint, but as a crucial waypoint.
It is a legal affirmation that the inherent beauty and cultural significance of ancestral hair practices are deserving of protection, respect, and celebration within every sphere of life. This legislation, with its focus on styles like braids, locs, and twists, ensures that the unique architectural elegance of textured hair is not only acknowledged but revered. It allows individuals to move through the world authentically, their heritage openly expressed upon their heads, a vibrant, visible reminder of their roots. In so doing, the Act helps us all understand that the true “Soul of a Strand” lies not in conformity, but in the freedom to express one’s sacred, inherited identity.

References
- Byrd, Ayana, and Lori Tharps. Hair Story ❉ Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America. St. Martin’s Griffin, 2001.
- Clayton, Jackye. “Strands of Change ❉ How the CROWN Act Shapes Our Understanding of Professionalism.” Forbes, 1 May 2024.
- Diedrich, Nicole. “Remedying Trait-Based Employment Discrimination ❉ Lessons from the CROWN Act.” Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, 2022, pp. 201-240.
- Dove. The CROWN Research Study ❉ Hair Discrimination in the Workplace. 2019.
- Gale, Victoria. “The ‘Dreaded’ Colonial Legacy ❉ African Hair in the History of Colonialism.” The Gale Review, 23 Nov. 2021.
- Omotos, Adetutu. “The Significance of Hair in Ancient African Civilizations.” Journal of Pan African Studies, 2018.
- U.S. House of Representatives. H.R. 5309, The CROWN Act of 2020. 116th Congress, 2020.
- Walker, Toni. Remarks to Connecticut House of Representatives on An Act Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair. 25 Feb. 2021.
- White, Deborah Gray. Ar’n’t I a Woman? ❉ Female Slaves in the Plantation South. W. W. Norton & Company, 1999.