What ancestral hair practices are affirmed by the CROWN Act?

Roots

The coil and curl, the loc and twist – these are more than mere strands; they are living archives, whispering stories from antiquity. For those whose lineage traces through the vast, complex continent of Africa and across the wide diaspora, hair has always been a language, a declaration, a connection to the very earth and spirit of those who came before. In countless ancestral societies, hair was a map of identity ❉ denoting age, marital status, tribal affiliation, spiritual standing, even wealth and power. Imagine, if you will, the daily ritual in an ancient village where the care of hair was not a chore, but a communion, a passing down of wisdom from elder to child, a tactile lesson in self-worth and community belonging.

These traditions, meticulously passed from generation to generation, weathered the storms of displacement, enslavement, and systemic oppression, persisting as defiant acts of cultural continuity. The CROWN Act, in its legislative clarity, arrives not as an innovator, but as a long-overdue echo of recognition, affirming these practices not as trends or fads, but as foundational elements of a people’s heritage.

The CROWN Act’s legal stance reaffirms the deeply held ancestral practices that link textured hair to identity and community.

Hair Anatomy and Textured Hair Physiology

To truly grasp the affirmation embedded within the CROWN Act, one must appreciate the unique biology of textured hair itself. At its core, all hair is protein, primarily keratin, growing from follicles nestled within the scalp. Yet, the journey of this protein from follicle to strand differs remarkably across various hair types. Textured hair, particularly those with tighter curls and coils, emerges from an elliptically shaped follicle, causing the strand to grow in an oval or flattened shape.

This shape compels the hair to spiral and twist as it grows, creating the distinct curl patterns we celebrate. This inherent curvature, while beautiful, also means the cuticle, the protective outer layer of the hair shaft, is more exposed at the bends and turns. Consequently, natural oils produced by the scalp, intended to travel down the shaft, find this journey more arduous, leading to a tendency toward dryness. This structural reality informed ancestral care practices for centuries, long before microscopes revealed these truths. Ancestors understood that the hair needed careful handling, regular moisture, and protective styling to thrive.

Consider the science of Hair Elasticity, a critical aspect of textured hair health. Ancestral methods of detangling and styling, often involving water and natural lubricants like plant oils or butters, were designed to enhance elasticity and minimize breakage. They intuitively understood that wet hair was more pliable, less prone to snapping, an understanding now validated by modern trichology. This continuity of wisdom, from intuitive ancestral care to contemporary scientific validation, underscores the enduring validity of these traditional methods.

Ancestral Classification Systems and the CROWN Act’s Affirmation

While modern hair classification systems, like the Andre Walker typing system, categorize hair by numbers and letters (e.g. 4C, 3B), these systems often fall short in capturing the richness and diversity of textured hair, sometimes even perpetuating a narrow beauty standard. Ancestral societies, in contrast, possessed their own classifications, often based not on a numerical scale of curl tightness, but on attributes that held cultural or spiritual significance.

A woman’s hair might be described by its resemblance to a particular plant, a flowing river, or a celestial body – names imbued with meaning and reverence. These descriptive systems were fluid, personal, and celebrated the inherent beauty of each unique pattern.

The CROWN Act, by protecting styles like braids, locs, twists, and Bantu knots, effectively steps beyond arbitrary classifications and honors the inherent diversity of Black and mixed-race hair as it is naturally worn and traditionally styled. It recognizes that these styles are not merely aesthetic choices, but deeply rooted expressions of a specific heritage, transcending simplistic categorization. The Act’s affirmation allows individuals to reclaim these names and styles without fear of professional or social reprisal.

The Essential Lexicon of Textured Hair

Language shapes perception. The words we use to describe textured hair carry weight, history, and often, the echoes of societal prejudice. The CROWN Act’s very existence challenges a lexicon that historically pathologized Black hair, labeling it “unprofessional,” “messy,” or “unkept.” Ancestral traditions, conversely, offered a vocabulary steeped in admiration and utility.

Terms like Tresses, used in many West African cultures, denote not just hair, but a precious, flowing entity. The act of “combing out” or “plaiting” was often accompanied by specific chants or stories, weaving a narrative of identity into the very strands.

• Knotting ❉ A West African technique where hair is twisted into small, tight coils, often to protect ends or create curl patterns upon release.
• Braiding ❉ A universal ancestral practice, with variations like cornrows (often called “canerows” in some regions) and box braids, signifying intricate artistry and social cohesion.
• Locing ❉ The ancient art of encouraging hair strands to intertwine and bind into ropes, a practice found in numerous cultures globally, carrying spiritual and cultural weight for millennia.

The power of the CROWN Act lies in its ability to reclaim and legitimize this ancestral lexicon within modern professional and educational spaces, allowing individuals to speak the language of their hair heritage freely.

Ritual

The rhythm of ancestral hair care was a dance of intention, a sequence of actions that extended beyond mere aesthetics. It was a ritual, a sacred cadence connecting the individual to their lineage, to the earth, and to the community. These rituals were not static; they were dynamic, adapting across varied landscapes and generations, yet always retaining a core reverence for the hair itself.

The CROWN Act, then, serves as a legislative balm, offering protection for the public expression of these rituals that have, for too long, been marginalized or misunderstood. It speaks to the right to wear one’s hair not only as a style but as a continuation of these profound, often spiritual, practices.

Ancestral hair practices, from cleansing to protective styles, formed holistic rituals that the CROWN Act now legally upholds.

Protective Styling Encyclopedia

Many ancestral hair practices centered on Protection, a recognition of textured hair’s inherent tendencies towards dryness and fragility. Styles like braids, twists, and locs were not simply decorative; they were ingenious methods of safeguarding the hair shaft, retaining moisture, and minimizing breakage. In ancient Egypt, elaborate braided styles and wigs protected the scalp from the harsh desert sun, while also signifying status and divine connection (Thompson, 2001).

Across various West African cultures, intricate cornrow patterns conveyed social standing, marital status, or even acted as maps, guiding those who could decipher their complex designs (Byrd & Tharps, 2014). These protective measures also reduced daily manipulation, allowing hair to rest and grow.

The CROWN Act explicitly affirms the right to wear these protective styles in professional and academic settings. This legal affirmation is a vital step in dismantling generations of prejudice that labeled these styles “unprofessional” or “distracting.” It acknowledges that a style like a Cornrow or a Loc is not a deviation from a norm, but an enduring, culturally significant tradition. The Act essentially declares that the ritual of protection, passed down through the ages, is worthy of respect and legal safeguarding.

Natural Styling and Definition Techniques

Beyond long-term protective styles, ancestral practices also included daily methods for defining and accentuating natural curl patterns. Techniques such as Finger Coiling, where individual strands or small sections are twisted around a finger to create defined spirals, find their roots in practices that predated modern styling products. Similarly, the use of natural substances – plant-based gels from flaxseed or aloe vera, or rich butters like shea and cocoa – were crucial for enhancing curl definition and providing moisture.

The essence of these practices was to work with the hair’s natural inclination, not against it. This contrasts sharply with historical pressures to chemically alter or straighten textured hair to conform to Eurocentric beauty standards. The CROWN Act supports this intrinsic desire to celebrate one’s natural texture, a sentiment that resonates deeply with ancestral wisdom advocating for the well-being of the hair in its authentic state.

Relay

The CROWN Act’s enactment is a relay baton passed from the hands of ancestors to the present generation, carrying forward the profound legacy of hair as a cultural artifact, a symbol of resistance, and a testament to enduring identity. This legislative action acknowledges that the historical subjugation of Black and mixed-race hair was never simply about aesthetics; it was a mechanism of control, a systemic denial of self-expression rooted in a deeply Eurocentric worldview. By explicitly protecting hair texture and protective styles, the Act begins to dismantle these deeply entrenched biases, allowing the relay of ancestral practices to continue unhindered in public spheres.

The CROWN Act represents a critical legal intervention, validating ancestral hair practices against historical discrimination.

The CROWN Act and Its Historical Context

To truly comprehend the significance of the CROWN Act, one must cast a gaze back through the annals of history, particularly the period following the transatlantic slave trade. During this era, and extending through Jim Crow and into contemporary times, Black individuals were often coerced, both overtly and subtly, to alter their hair to conform to dominant societal norms. This wasn’t a matter of personal choice; it was a tool of racial oppression, a barrier to employment, education, and social acceptance. Consider the infamous 1976 case of Rogers v.

American Airlines, where flight attendant Renee Rogers was denied the right to wear cornrows at work, sparking a significant legal battle over hair discrimination. Though Rogers ultimately lost her case, the fight itself laid groundwork for the future legal challenges that would culminate in the CROWN Act (Neal & Bailey, 2019). The Act directly addresses this historical pattern, affirming that the very styles once used to exclude, are now legally protected forms of self-expression.

A powerful statistical example illustrating this historical burden comes from a 2019 study by the Dove CROWN Research Study. It found that Black women are 80% More Likely to Be Perceived as Unprofessional when they wear their hair in natural hairstyles compared to white women with straight hair (Dove CROWN Research Study, 2019). This statistic powerfully underscores the systemic bias that the CROWN Act seeks to counteract, demonstrating that discrimination against natural hair is not anecdotal but widespread and quantifiable. The Act, therefore, does not just affirm practices; it affirms dignity and equitable access.

Interpreting the Affirmation of Ancestral Practices

What, then, are the specific ancestral practices that the CROWN Act, through its legislative lens, affirms? The Act typically defines protected hairstyles to include, but not limit to, styles such as braids, locs, twists, and knots. These are precisely the styles that have been foundational to Black hair culture for centuries.

1. Braids (including Cornrows and Box Braids) ❉ These styles, with roots spanning millennia across various African civilizations, served not only practical purposes of hair maintenance but also conveyed social narratives, tribal identities, and even spiritual messages. The Act’s protection of braids validates their historical and cultural significance.
2. Locs (Dreadlocks) ❉ A powerful, ancient form of hair formation found in numerous cultures globally, including many African societies. For many, locs are a spiritual journey, a declaration of freedom, and a connection to ancestry. The Act ensures that individuals cannot be penalized for this deeply personal and culturally resonant choice.
3. Twists (Two-Strand Twists, Flat Twists) ❉ Often used as a protective style or a foundational method for creating other styles, twists are a versatile and common practice in textured hair care. They mirror ancestral techniques for grouping hair to prevent damage and promote growth.
4. Bantu Knots ❉ Originating from the Bantu-speaking people of Southern Africa, these are small, coiled buns that can be worn as a style or undone to create voluminous curls. Their inclusion in the Act recognizes a practice with deep historical roots, highlighting its aesthetic and protective utility.

The CROWN Act, in its explicit inclusion of these terms, translates cultural respect into legal standing. It provides a shield for the continuity of heritage, ensuring that the wisdom of generations past can flow freely into the present, without fear of economic or social penalty. This legal framework represents a powerful recognition of cultural legacy, making space for ancestral practices to flourish as markers of identity, not targets of discrimination. It is a legislative acknowledgment of the inherent connection between hair, history, and human rights.

Reflection

As the final threads of this exploration settle, we are left with a quiet reverence for the journey of textured hair. From the deepest roots of our collective memory, through the tender rituals of daily care, to the bold statements of identity voiced in the world, hair has always been a conduit. The CROWN Act, in its quiet strength, serves as a reaffirmation of something ancient and enduring ❉ the undeniable right to embody one’s heritage, outwardly visible in the very texture and style of our hair. This legislative stride does not grant new dignity to textured hair; that dignity has always existed, carried in the spirit of every ancestor who braided, coiled, or loc’d their strands in defiance, celebration, or simple maintenance.

What the Act does, with profound implication, is remove artificial barriers, allowing the radiant soul of each strand to reflect the luminous wisdom passed down through time. It is a call to remember, a gentle reminder that our hair is not just fiber and protein, but a living, breathing connection to a rich, uninterrupted history, forever unbound.