In what ways does the CROWN Act seek to protect textured hair heritage in the workplace?

Roots

For those whose heritage whispers through each coil and curve of their hair, the workplace has too often been a realm where identity is challenged, rather than celebrated. The very fibers that grow from our scalps, deeply connected to generations of ancestral wisdom and cultural expression, have been deemed “unprofessional” or “unsuitable.” This is where the CROWN Act enters the dialogue, not as a mere legal formality, but as a recognition of the profound historical and cultural significance of textured hair. It stands as a legislative effort to safeguard the tangible markers of Black and mixed-race heritage within professional spaces, ensuring that the journey of one’s hair from root to tip can be a story of self-acceptance and dignity, rather than a tale of forced conformity.

Hair Anatomy and the Echoes of Ancestry

The biological make-up of textured hair is a testament to its unique resilience and versatility, characteristics that have been both revered and misunderstood across historical epochs. Unlike straight hair, which typically grows from round follicles, coily and kinky hair emerges from more oval or elliptical-shaped follicles. This shape causes the hair strand to twist and coil as it grows, creating natural bends and curves. These structural distinctions contribute to the hair’s ability to hold intricate styles, a quality deeply woven into the cultural practices of African communities for millennia.

The varying keratin distribution along the hair shaft also contributes to its distinct patterns, leading to different textures on a single head of hair. (Welsing-Kitcher, 2021).

From a scientific standpoint, understanding these foundational aspects of textured hair is not merely academic; it is an act of reclaiming knowledge that was often dismissed or devalued. The very characteristics that render textured hair prone to dryness or breakage, such as the difficulty of natural scalp oils traveling down the coiled strand, also contribute to its strength when cared for with ancestral wisdom. This scientific understanding validates traditional practices focused on moisture retention and protective styling, showing a continuum between ancient knowledge and modern findings.

What Historical Narratives Shape Our Understanding of Textured Hair Classification?

Historically, the classification of textured hair has been burdened by systems that prioritized Eurocentric beauty standards, often labeling Black hair as “kinky” or “nappy” with derogatory connotations. These terms, born from periods of enslavement and colonialism, sought to strip individuals of their cultural identity and impose a singular, often unattainable, standard of beauty (Byrd & Tharps, 2014). Yet, within African communities, hair was a sophisticated language. Styles conveyed age, marital status, tribal affiliation, wealth, and even spiritual beliefs (Oforiwa, 2023).

The CROWN Act, by specifically naming and protecting styles such as afros, braids, Bantu knots, and locs, directly confronts these historical biases. It re-establishes a lexicon of respect, acknowledging these styles not as mere fashion choices, but as expressions of deeply rooted heritage .

The CROWN Act stands as a legislative bridge, connecting the ancestral wisdom of textured hair care and styling to contemporary workplace norms.

The act of naming these styles in legislation is a powerful affirmation. It counters centuries of forced assimilation where African people were compelled to alter their natural hair to conform to European ideals, a practice that began with the dehumanizing act of shaving heads during the transatlantic slave trade. The CROWN Act recognizes that these styles are not simply “preferences” but integral components of racial and cultural identity.

• Braids ❉ Dating back to 3500 BC, braids in African cultures identified social status, marital status, wealth, kinship, and religion. During slavery, they were used as communication tools, even concealing escape maps or food.
• Locs ❉ Beyond their association with the Rastafari movement, locs hold ancient significance and symbolize spiritual strength and a connection to ancestry.
• Bantu Knots ❉ An ancient African style, originating from the Zulu tribes, symbolizing cultural continuity and pride across generations.
• Afros ❉ A powerful symbol of Black pride and resistance during the Civil Rights Movement, asserting Black identity against Eurocentric beauty norms.

Hair Growth Cycles and Ancestral Influences

The hair growth cycle, encompassing anagen (active growth), catagen (transitional), and telogen (resting) phases, is a universal biological process. However, environmental and nutritional factors, historically and presently, have played a role in hair health within different communities. Ancestral diets, rich in natural ingredients and unburdened by modern processing, likely contributed to robust hair health. Traditional African societies often relied on indigenous plants and natural resources for hair care, recognizing the importance of nourishing the scalp and strands (Oforiwa, 2023).

The CROWN Act indirectly supports healthy hair growth by reducing the pressure to engage in damaging practices. When individuals are forced to chemically straighten their hair or apply excessive heat to conform to workplace standards, it can lead to breakage, thinning, and scalp conditions. By protecting the right to wear natural styles, the Act lessens the burden of these harmful practices, allowing individuals to care for their hair in ways that honor its natural structure and ancestral wisdom, promoting healthier growth cycles. The freedom to maintain hair in its natural state permits a more aligned approach to care, one that respects the inherent biology of textured hair rather than fighting against it.

Ritual

Stepping from the foundational knowledge of textured hair, we now turn to the realm of its styling, a domain where heritage is not merely remembered but actively lived. The CROWN Act, in its legislative reach, touches upon these very rituals, recognizing that how one adorns their hair is often a profound act of cultural continuity. For generations, the techniques, tools, and transformations of Black and mixed-race hair have been passed down, each twist and braid carrying the echoes of communal gatherings and shared wisdom. This section explores how the Act provides a protective canopy over these ancestral practices, ensuring that the art of textured hair styling can flourish, unburdened by discriminatory pressures in professional settings.

Protective Styling as a Heritage Practice

Protective styles, such as braids, twists, and locs, are more than aesthetic choices; they are deeply ingrained practices rooted in African history, serving functional roles in hair health and cultural expression. These styles shield delicate strands from environmental damage, reduce manipulation, and aid in length retention. Their origins date back thousands of years in various African civilizations, where they conveyed messages about identity, status, and spiritual beliefs. During periods of enslavement, these styles took on additional layers of meaning, serving as covert communication systems and even hiding sustenance for survival.

The CROWN Act directly addresses the historical and ongoing discrimination against these protective styles in the workplace. For instance, the case of Chastity Jones, who had a job offer rescinded because she refused to cut her locs, illustrates the direct impact of such biases (EEOC, 2013). Such instances reveal how employers often perceive these styles as “unprofessional” or “unclean,” echoing colonial-era prejudices. By prohibiting discrimination based on these styles, the CROWN Act aims to dismantle these systemic biases, allowing individuals to wear their hair in culturally significant ways without fear of professional repercussions.

What is the Historical Context of Natural Styling and Definition Techniques?

The quest for natural hair definition and its careful styling has always been a significant part of textured hair care, even before the contemporary “natural hair movement.” Ancestral methods involved the careful application of natural oils, butters, and plant-based concoctions to define curl patterns, add luster, and maintain scalp health. The Himba tribe, for example, utilizes a mixture of clay and cow fat for hair protection and detangling, a tradition passed down through generations. Similarly, the use of Chebe powder in Chad is an age-old ritual for promoting hair growth and vitality, a practice inherited from mothers and grandmothers (Moussa, 2024). These methods reflect a profound understanding of the hair’s needs, developed over centuries through observation and communal knowledge sharing.

The Act acknowledges that personal appearance, particularly hair, is a powerful declaration of identity and cultural connection.

The CROWN Act’s scope encompasses the right to wear hair in its natural, defined state, which includes these traditional techniques. It recognizes that the smooth, straightened aesthetic often imposed in professional environments runs counter to the natural inclination and historical practices associated with textured hair. By protecting hair texture, the Act supports the freedom to use techniques that honor the hair’s inherent structure, rather than forcing alterations that can compromise its health and diminish cultural expression.

Wigs and Hair Extensions ❉ A Heritage of Adornment and Adaptation

The practice of wearing wigs and hair extensions also possesses a rich historical and cultural lineage within Black communities. In ancient Egypt, elaborate wigs signified status and divinity. Throughout the diaspora, wigs and extensions served as means of protection, versatility, and cultural expression, especially when traditional styles were suppressed.

They allowed for adaptability in challenging environments while still connecting to a broader aesthetic heritage. During times of overt discrimination, they offered a means of conformity while privately maintaining natural hair beneath.

The CROWN Act, by safeguarding against discrimination based on hair texture and styles, implicitly supports the freedom to choose how one adorns their hair, including the use of wigs and extensions. While the Act primarily addresses natural hair and protective styles, its broader intent to prevent race-based hair discrimination extends to choices made to present oneself professionally without sacrificing cultural authenticity. This means that individuals should not be penalized for choosing a wig or extensions that align with their cultural aesthetic, particularly if their natural hair, when worn openly, might still invite scrutiny in environments yet to fully internalize the Act’s spirit.

The Complete Textured Hair Toolkit and Its Ancestral Echoes

The tools used for textured hair care are as varied as the styles themselves, many with roots stretching back to antiquity. From intricately carved wooden combs in Ghana, some dating back to the 1950s, to the widespread use of the Afro pick as a symbol of Black pride in the 1960s, these implements are extensions of cultural practice. Traditional hair care often involved simple, natural materials and communal settings where skills were passed down through generations. These tools and techniques are part of a continuous lineage of care and styling that prioritizes the health and beauty of textured hair.

The CROWN Act, by affirming the right to wear natural and protective styles, indirectly validates the tools and techniques necessary for their maintenance. It acknowledges that the grooming requirements for textured hair differ from those for straight hair, and that the methods and implements used are part of a distinct cultural practice. The Act’s intent is to remove barriers that force individuals to abandon their heritage-informed hair care practices for Eurocentric norms, thus supporting the continued use and cultural transmission of the textured hair toolkit.

Relay

As we move into this exploration, we confront the deeper currents of the CROWN Act’s purpose ❉ how it seeks to mend historical fissures and project a vision of equity into future professional landscapes. The question extends beyond mere compliance; it invites contemplation of how this legislation actively shapes cultural narratives and supports the continuity of hair traditions. We consider the interplay of biological realities, psychological impacts, and societal structures, all through the lens of a heritage that has long endured scrutiny in the workplace. The CROWN Act does not merely forbid; it affirms, it protects, and in doing so, it facilitates a return to authenticity for countless individuals.

How Does the CROWN Act Confront Systemic Hair Bias in the Workplace?

The CROWN Act directly challenges a longstanding history of racial discrimination that has often used hair as a pretext for exclusion and marginalization. Before this legislation, existing federal anti-discrimination laws, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, did not explicitly protect against discrimination based on hair texture or style, leaving a significant loophole (EPI, 2023). This legal gap allowed employers and educational institutions to enforce grooming policies that disproportionately affected Black individuals, often deeming natural styles like afros, braids, and locs as “unprofessional”.

This perception is not benign; a CROWN Workplace Research Study found that Black women’s hair is 2.5 times more likely to be perceived as unprofessional. This statistic underscores a pervasive bias rooted in Eurocentric beauty standards that has historically penalized Black women in professional settings.

The Act’s legislative intent is to rectify this by explicitly defining race to include “traits historically associated with race, such as hair texture and protective hairstyles”. By doing so, it eliminates the ambiguity that allowed for discriminatory practices to persist. This legal clarity is crucial, as prior court rulings often sided with employers, arguing that hairstyles were mutable characteristics, not immutable racial traits (JSTOR Daily, 2019). The CROWN Act counters this by recognizing that these hairstyles are inextricably linked to racial identity and cultural heritage .

For example, the 2013 case of Chastity Jones, where a job offer was rescinded due to her locs, exemplifies the kind of discrimination the CROWN Act directly addresses (Fisher Phillips, 2020). This move is not merely about legal definitions; it is about recognizing the inherent dignity and right to cultural expression for individuals whose hair has been a site of struggle and resilience for generations.

What is the Psychological and Societal Impact of Hair Discrimination?

The impact of hair discrimination extends far beyond mere appearance; it strikes at the core of an individual’s self-worth and mental well-being. Studies indicate that discrimination, including that based on hair, is linked to negative mental health outcomes such as reduced self-esteem, altered self-identity, anxiety, and chronic stress (PMC, 2023). For Black individuals, whose hair is often a significant part of their identity and cultural heritage, being told that their natural hair is “unprofessional” or “messy” can result in internalized racism and a diminished sense of belonging. This psychological burden can lead to a “suppression of identity traits,” where individuals feel compelled to alter their hair to assimilate, thereby sacrificing a part of themselves for perceived professional acceptance (Opie & Phillips, 2015).

The CROWN Act seeks to alleviate this mental and emotional strain by creating legal safeguards. By validating natural and protective hairstyles, the Act sends a clear message that these expressions of heritage are acceptable and worthy of respect in all settings. This affirmation can foster a greater sense of psychological safety and belonging for Black professionals, reducing the need to constantly negotiate their appearance to fit Eurocentric norms. When individuals are free to bring their authentic selves, including their natural hair, to the workplace, it can lead to increased productivity and a more inclusive environment (Smith et al.

2019). The Act is not just a legal instrument; it is a statement of societal progress, acknowledging that true professionalism lies in competence and character, not in conformity to arbitrary beauty standards. It is a step towards healing the historical wounds inflicted by hair bias, allowing individuals to stand tall in their ancestral beauty.

By safeguarding natural hair, the CROWN Act enables individuals to carry their ancestral stories into modern professional spaces without fear of judgment.

Legislative Trajectories and the Path to Wider Acceptance

The CROWN Act’s journey began in California in 2019, becoming the first state to prohibit discrimination based on hairstyle and texture. Since then, the movement has gained significant momentum, with over two dozen states enacting similar legislation. At the federal level, the CROWN Act was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2020 and passed in 2022, though it currently awaits Senate approval.

This staggered legislative progress reflects a growing, yet still incomplete, societal recognition of hair discrimination as a form of racial bias. The ongoing legal challenges, such as the case of Darryl George in Texas, where a judge ruled that the state’s CROWN Act did not apply to hairstyle length, highlight the continued need for explicit and comprehensive protections.

The Act’s intent is to create a unified standard across the nation, ensuring that protections for textured hair heritage are not subject to varied interpretations or regional disparities. Senator Cory Booker, a key proponent, articulated that the Act is an “effort to heal a systemic bias that tells Black people that who they inherently are is wrong”. This speaks to the broader societal shift the CROWN Act seeks to inspire ❉ a move towards valuing diversity and acknowledging the rich cultural contributions that textured hair represents. The Act’s success will ultimately be measured not only by its passage in all jurisdictions but by its ability to reshape perceptions, dismantle implicit biases, and cultivate truly respectful and open environments where all hair stories can be told without reservation.

Reflection

The journey of textured hair, from the ancient rhythms of ancestral care to the contemporary battlegrounds of the workplace, is a testament to resilience and an enduring spirit. The CROWN Act, in its quiet strength, serves as a beacon along this path, recognizing that a strand of hair is never simply a biological filament; it is a repository of memory, a symbol of identity, and a vibrant declaration of heritage. This legislation does not merely address a superficial aspect of appearance; it speaks to the soul of a strand, affirming the right of every individual to carry their ancestral stories, their cultural practices, and their authentic selves into every corner of their lives, including the professional sphere. It reminds us that true progress lies in honoring the diverse beauty that springs from the very roots of our shared humanity, allowing every textured coil to stand unbound, a testament to a legacy that continues to flourish.

References

• Byrd, A. D. & Tharps, L. (2014). Hair Story ❉ Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America. St. Martin’s Press.
• Dawson, G. A. Karl, K. A. & Peluchette, J. V. (2019). Hair Matters ❉ Toward Understanding Natural Black Hair Bias in the Workplace. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(3), 389-401.
• Oforiwa, A. (2023). The History and Culture of African Natural Hair ❉ From Ancient Times to Modern Trends. AMAKA Studio.
• Opie, T. R. & Phillips, K. W. (2015). The Effect of Afrocentric Hairstyles on Perceptions of Professionalism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1488-1498.
• Smith, L. et al. (2019). The Economic Impact of Hair Discrimination. Unpublished Manuscript.
• Welsing-Kitcher, A. (2021). The Science of Textured Hair. Carra.