Roots
To truly understand the ways hair typing reflects historical biases against textured hair heritage, we must listen closely to the whispers carried by each curl, coil, and wave. These are not merely strands; they are living archives, imbued with the triumphs and struggles of generations. When we categorize hair into rigid numerical systems, we risk reducing a profound legacy to a mere classification, inadvertently echoing old, discomforting narratives. The journey to comprehend the textured hair experience, particularly within Black and mixed-race communities, invites a look beyond the surface, recognizing hair as a sacred connection to ancestry, identity, and spirit.
Early Classifications and the Gaze of Power
The very concept of categorizing human hair, as we know it today, carries a troubling lineage. Long before the popular charts of our contemporary world, early scientific endeavors, often intertwined with colonial expansion and racial ideologies, sought to classify humanity based on physical traits. These efforts, particularly in the 19th and early 20th centuries, frequently positioned textured hair as a marker of perceived inferiority.
Scientific research on hair in the past hundred years typically classified hair based on race with only three types ❉ Caucasian, Asian, and African, categories that failed to represent the actual diversity within populations. This era saw the emergence of tools and systems aimed at measuring proximity to so-called ‘whiteness’ based on hair texture.
Hair typing, in its foundational historical expressions, served as a tool for racial categorization, aiming to quantify proximity to dominant beauty ideals.
One particularly stark example arises from the work of Eugen Fischer, a German Nazi scientist. In 1908, Fischer developed a ‘hair gauge’ to measure Namibians’ perceived proximity to whiteness based on their hair texture. This tool was deployed during a period of immense violence and subjugation in Namibia, a direct link between hair classification and the machinery of racial supremacy.
Such practices found echoes in other discriminatory systems, such as the Apartheid Pencil Test in South Africa, where if a pencil placed in hair stayed, the person could not be classified as white. This history reveals how classifying hair became a means to enforce social hierarchies, denying personhood and perpetuating harmful stereotypes against those with hair that deviated from European standards.
How Did Early Classifications of Textured Hair Reflect Colonial Mindsets?
Early classifications of textured hair were deeply symptomatic of colonial mindsets, which sought to order and control the world through a lens of racial hierarchy. Textured hair, particularly the tightly coiled hair of African peoples, was often deemed ‘uncivilized’ or ‘unprofessional’ by European colonizers. This perception was not simply an aesthetic judgment; it was a strategic dehumanization, stripping enslaved Africans of their ancestral connections and cultural identifiers.
Slave traders would even shave the heads of newly enslaved people to humiliate them and sever their ties with their culture and homeland. The imposed Eurocentric beauty standards created a pressure to conform, where proximity to ‘whiteness’ was not merely a cosmetic preference but sometimes, a matter of survival, with enslaved people possessing more ‘European’ features, including hair, receiving preferential treatment.
The Andre Walker System and Its Legacy
Fast forward to the late 20th century, and a new hair typing system emerged, popularized by celebrity stylist Andre Walker in the 1990s. This system, classifying hair into types 1 (straight) through 4 (coily), with subcategories (a, b, c), became widely adopted within the beauty industry. While Walker’s stated intention was to help consumers understand and care for their hair, the system inadvertently carried forward a legacy of bias.
Its critics often point to an apparent hierarchy that places straighter textures at the top, implying a decreasing desirability or manageability as one moves towards the 4c spectrum. This subtle valuing of looser curl patterns contributed to what is now recognized as texturism, a form of discrimination where tighter, more coiled hair textures face prejudice.
Product formulations and marketing historically neglected or actively targeted textured hair with straightening chemicals. The widespread marketing of chemical relaxers, which semi-permanently alter the hair shaft, became deeply ingrained in Black hair culture. These products, often containing harsh chemicals, were used to achieve straighter hair, a direct response to societal pressures and ingrained beauty standards.
The consumption of hair relaxers has seen a decline since 2011, a testament to the growing natural hair movement. Yet, the desire to alter natural texture persists, sometimes driven by the perception that hair closest to type 4 needs ‘improvement’ or ‘definition.’
The Language of Hair Classification ❉ A Deep Dive
The very words we use to describe hair are imbued with historical connotations. Terms like ‘kinky,’ ‘woolly,’ or ‘nappy,’ historically applied to Afro-textured hair, have been used in derogatory ways. Even within systems that seem neutral, the descriptive language can inadvertently perpetuate negative associations. For instance, the Andre Walker system uses descriptors like ‘kinky-coily’ for type 4 hair, which critics argue carries a form of bias by focusing too much on race.
Ancestral communities understood hair not through such rigid classifications, but through its spirit, its needs, and its deep connection to the individual and their community. Their lexicon for hair was rooted in observations of its qualities, its resilience, and its inherent beauty, rather than comparative judgments. The wisdom of these communities centered on responsive care, respecting hair’s natural inclinations, and celebrating its unique expressions.
The Biology of Textured Hair ❉ Unpicking Innate Qualities
From a biological standpoint, textured hair possesses unique characteristics that dictate its appearance and behavior. The shape of the hair follicle plays a significant role; those with curly and coily hair possess hook-shaped follicles, while straight hair grows from round follicles. This structural difference, along with the way disulfide bonds are arranged within the hair shaft, creates the spiraling pattern we recognize as texture. Dr.
Tina Lasisi, a biological anthropologist, theorizes that tightly coiled hair may have evolved as an adaptation to hot climates, offering protection from intense ultraviolet radiation. This biological reality speaks to hair’s natural diversity, a spectrum of beautiful variations that should be honored, not judged by systems that prioritize one form over another. An important insight from her research suggests that a truly diverse hair typing system would likely devote more than 75% of its categories to the vast diversity within very curly and tightly coiled hair. This highlights how current systems overemphasize the smaller range of variation seen in European hair, while minimizing the considerable spectrum within African and African-descendant hair.
Ritual
The tending of textured hair has always been a profound ritual, a dialogue with ancestral memory and a living expression of communal artistry. These practices, often passed through generations, stand as testament to ingenuity and resilience, revealing how notions of hair typing have influenced, and at times, been resisted by, the heritage of care and styling. Each braid, each coil, each twist holds a story, a connection to ways of being that predate the imposition of external beauty standards.
Protective Styling ❉ A Shield of Cultural Memory
Protective styles, such as cornrows, braids, twists, and locs, represent ancient forms of hair artistry with deep roots in African cultures. Before the transatlantic slave trade, hairstyles served as complex visual codes, communicating a person’s age, marital status, wealth, ethnic identity, and even spiritual beliefs. These intricate designs were not mere adornments; they were historical documents, community identifiers, and even, at times, secret maps to freedom during enslavement. The continued practice of these styles today connects individuals to this powerful heritage, offering both physical protection for the hair and a strong affirmation of cultural identity.
Protective styles are living embodiments of ancestral wisdom, offering a shield for hair and a canvas for cultural narratives.
The influence of hair typing on these practices has been insidious. When hair types deemed ‘easier’ or ‘more manageable’ are implicitly or explicitly favored, the very act of protective styling can be framed as a necessity to control ‘unruly’ hair, rather than a celebration of its innate qualities or a preservation of ancestral practices. This bias can diminish the cultural significance of these styles, reducing them to mere maintenance techniques rather than expressions of a vibrant lineage.
| Traditional African Styling Techniques Cornrows ❉ Intricate patterns often signifying status, tribe, or religious belief. Used for moisture retention and scalp health. |
| Modern Adaptations and Continuity Braided Extensions ❉ Contemporary versions often incorporate synthetic or human hair for length and volume. Still valued for hair protection and styling versatility. |
| Traditional African Styling Techniques Locs/Dreadlocks ❉ Spiritual and communal significance in many cultures, often representing a sacred commitment or life phase. |
| Modern Adaptations and Continuity Freeform Locs, Sisterlocks, Microlocs ❉ Modern approaches offering variations in size and maintenance, yet retaining the deep cultural symbolism and low-manipulation benefits. |
| Traditional African Styling Techniques Threading ❉ A technique using thread to stretch and protect hair, often without heat. |
| Modern Adaptations and Continuity Banding/African Threading ❉ Revitalized as a heatless stretching method in the natural hair community, highlighting a return to gentler, older ways. |
| Traditional African Styling Techniques The enduring presence of these styling traditions shows how ancestral practices continue to shape contemporary textured hair care, adapting yet holding firm to heritage. |
How Did Hair Typing Influence the Development of Tools for Textured Hair Care and Styling?
Hair typing systems, particularly those that implicitly ranked textures, profoundly influenced the development and marketing of hair care tools. Early in the 20th century, as Eurocentric beauty ideals became dominant, tools designed to alter natural texture became widespread. The metal hot comb, invented in the 1880s, and later chemical relaxers, marketed by African Americans like Garrett Augustus Morgan in the early 1900s, offered pathways to straighten hair. These tools and chemical processes gained traction within communities where textured hair was often stigmatized, leading to the unfortunate reality of scalp burns and damage as a common part of the Black female experience.
The availability of products and tools often aligned with the perceived ‘manageability’ of certain hair types. For those with tighter coils (often categorized as 4C), the market historically offered fewer products designed to nourish their natural texture, instead pushing solutions that would loosen or straighten it. This created a cycle where the very tools and products available reinforced the idea that certain hair types needed ‘fixing.’
Reclaiming Styling Autonomy ❉ A Return to Heritage
The natural hair movement, gaining prominence in the 1960s and 70s as part of broader civil rights and Black power movements, represented a powerful rejection of these ingrained biases. It marked a conscious return to embracing one’s natural texture, shifting away from conformity and towards a celebration of inherent beauty. This movement challenged the notion that straight hair was the sole standard of beauty, promoting self-acceptance and a deeper connection to ancestral roots.
This reclaiming of styling autonomy led to a renewed interest in traditional methods and ingredients that supported hair in its natural state. It was a conscious decision to value healthy, thriving hair over hair that conformed to a biased ideal. This cultural shift led to increased visibility of diverse textures and a demand for products designed to cater to the unique needs of coily and curly hair, rather than alter it.
Community and Shared Rituals ❉ The Intergenerational Exchange
Hair care in many African and diasporic communities has always been a communal activity, a social event where women gathered, shared stories, and strengthened familial bonds. These intergenerational spaces served as crucial sites for transmitting knowledge about hair care, styling techniques, and the cultural significance of hair. Practices like braiding circles fostered a sense of belonging and reinforced shared heritage, far removed from the isolating, often damaging, practices driven by external beauty standards.
The wisdom passed down in these communal settings focused on understanding individual hair needs through observation and tradition, rather than relying on generalized categories. It was a deep, intuitive knowledge of what the hair needed to flourish, built upon centuries of lived experience and collective wisdom. This rich heritage stands in contrast to rigid typing systems that can abstract hair from its living, breathing cultural context.
Relay
The journey of textured hair is an ongoing dialogue, a relay race where ancestral wisdom is passed to contemporary hands, continually shaping our understanding of holistic care and problem-solving. Hair typing, with its inherent biases, has often presented a hurdle in this race, yet the resilience of heritage ensures that the wisdom persists, offering paths to wellness that transcend reductive classifications. The very fiber of textured hair, with its unique structure and inherent needs, calls for a responsive, holistic approach, one rooted in a deep respect for its origins.
Holistic Health ❉ Hair as a Reflection of Our Being
Ancestral wellness philosophies often viewed hair not merely as an appendage but as an extension of the self, deeply connected to one’s spiritual, physical, and emotional wellbeing. This perspective stands in stark contrast to the atomizing effect of hair typing systems, which tend to isolate hair into categories, disconnecting it from the whole person and their lived experience. In many traditional African cultures, hair held deep spiritual significance, considered a bridge between the living and the ancestral world, with specific rituals performed before important life events. This reverence meant that hair care was an act of nourishment for the body and the soul.
The Nighttime Sanctum ❉ Bonnet Wisdom and Protective Legacies
The practice of covering hair for protection, particularly during sleep, holds a long and multifaceted heritage. From ancient Egypt, where head coverings protected hair from the desert environment, to traditional African communities using headwraps to maintain styles and signify status, the wisdom of protecting hair has been consistent. During slavery, African American women used headwraps and bonnets as a crucial tool for protection against harsh conditions, and as a symbol of resilience and identity. By the 1950s, the bonnet had become a staple in textured hair care, preventing friction and moisture loss during sleep.
The enduring practice of wearing bonnets or headwraps for hair protection reflects a continuous thread of ancestral wisdom in hair care.
This tradition directly addresses the needs of textured hair, which is prone to dryness and breakage due to its unique coil pattern. The very act of wearing a bonnet safeguards moisture and preserves styles, an act of self-preservation and care passed down through generations. Hair typing systems, by focusing solely on curl pattern, often fail to adequately account for these underlying needs and the historical solutions that have emerged to address them. The modern resurgence of bonnets represents a reclaiming of this ancestral practice, prioritizing hair health over perceived conformity.
Do Hair Typing Systems Hinder a Holistic View of Hair Wellness Rooted in Ancestral Practices?
Hair typing systems can indeed hinder a holistic view of hair wellness, especially when that view is rooted in ancestral practices. Traditional hair care was not about fitting a curl into a predefined box; it was about observing the hair’s natural state, its response to the environment, and its individual needs, drawing upon a deep understanding of botanical and natural remedies. The wisdom of ancestral communities, like the Basara Tribe of T’Chad using chebe to retain length, or Ethiopian and Somali women using whipped animal milk as “hair butter,” shows a sophisticated understanding of hair’s needs, often relying on fats, oils, and herbs to maintain health and moisture. These practices address the hair’s density, porosity, and strength, elements that modern science also recognizes as critical for hair health, often more so than mere curl pattern.
When a system categorizes hair primarily by its curl pattern, it can overshadow other vital considerations such as porosity (how well hair absorbs and retains moisture), density (how many strands are on the head), and strand thickness. These latter qualities are often more pertinent to determining a hair’s true needs and how it will respond to various products and treatments. A system that overemphasizes curl pattern can inadvertently lead to a misdiagnosis of hair needs, pushing individuals to use products or techniques not suitable for their hair’s actual porosity or density, merely because they share a “type.” This can perpetuate cycles of damage or frustration, distancing individuals from the intuitive, responsive care that ancestral practices advocated.
Ingredients and Ancestral Wisdom ❉ A Natural Pharmacy
The traditional pharmacopeia of textured hair care is rich with ingredients understood for their nutritive properties long before laboratory analysis. Natural butters, herbs, and powders were essential for moisture retention and scalp health. Shea butter, coconut oil, castor oil, and various herbal infusions have been used for centuries to moisturize, protect, and fortify hair. These ingredients were chosen for their proven efficacy in supporting the unique needs of diverse textures, promoting softness, strength, and resilience.
- Shea Butter ❉ Extracted from the nuts of the African shea tree, it is renowned for its moisturizing and conditioning properties, widely used to seal in moisture for dry, textured hair.
- African Black Soap ❉ Traditionally used for cleansing the hair and scalp, it offers gentle yet effective purification, often made from plantain skins, palm tree leaves, cocoa pods, and shea tree bark.
- Chebe Powder ❉ Originating from Chadian communities, this blend of herbs is applied to hair strands to prevent breakage and promote length retention by fortifying the hair shaft.
- Castor Oil ❉ Known for its thick consistency, this oil, especially Jamaican Black Castor Oil, is prized for stimulating hair growth and strengthening hair roots, a common practice across the diaspora.
The knowledge of these ingredients and their targeted application was passed down through generations, forming a practical and deeply intuitive science. This body of knowledge offers a stark contrast to modern marketing that often categorizes products solely by hair type, sometimes overlooking the foundational elements of hair health rooted in this ancient wisdom.
Beyond the Strand ❉ Hair as a Medium for Self-Determination
Challenging the limitations of hair typing systems allows for a profound liberation, moving beyond prescribed notions of beauty towards a celebration of inherent diversity. This shift supports individual and collective identity, fostering self-acceptance and pride in one’s textured hair heritage . When we recognize that hair is a symbol of resilience, cultural heritage, and connection to ancestral roots, we dismantle the biases that have historically marginalized it.
The ongoing conversation about hair discrimination, evidenced by movements like the CROWN Act, underscores the persistent impact of these biases in various settings. The CROWN Act, which aims to prohibit discrimination against natural hair in workplaces and schools, highlights the reality that Black women, especially those with coily or textured hair, are twice as likely to experience microaggressions at work. A 2023 study found that Black women’s hair is 2.5 times as likely as white women’s hair to be perceived as ‘unprofessional,’ leading 66% of Black women to change their hair for a job interview, with 41% altering it from curly to straight.
This data powerfully illuminates how hair typing, even if an informal understanding, has real-world consequences, reflecting systemic inequities that demand deep reconsideration. The embrace of natural hair becomes an act of self-determination, a powerful statement of cultural pride and a rejection of narratives that diminish any aspect of one’s inherited self.
Reflection
The journey through the intricate world of textured hair, from its foundational biology to the echoes of ancestral rituals, reveals a profound truth ❉ hair typing, while seemingly a neutral classificatory tool, carries the indelible imprint of historical biases. It stands as a silent testament to centuries of imposition, where Eurocentric beauty standards attempted to flatten the glorious spectrum of human hair into a hierarchy, devaluing the vibrant, resilient textures that are intrinsic to Black and mixed-race heritage.
Yet, within every curl and coil resides a spirit of unwavering resilience. The very acts of cultivating natural hair, of embracing protective styles, and of returning to the wisdom of ancestral ingredients are not mere trends; they are continuous acts of reclamation. They are a profound meditation on self-acceptance, a conscious unearthing of a heritage that was systematically suppressed. The Soul of a Strand, then, is not merely a metaphor; it is the enduring narrative of identity, connection, and liberation, written in the very fiber of our being.
By understanding the historical undercurrents that have shaped hair typing, we equip ourselves to dismantle remaining prejudices and to champion a future where every texture is celebrated as a unique, powerful expression of its ancestral lineage. This collective wisdom, passed down through generations, invites us to look beyond rigid classifications and instead, to see hair as a living, breathing archive of identity, deeply rooted in the enduring spirit of heritage.
References
- Byrd, Ayana. Hair Story ❉ Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America. St. Martin’s Press, 2001.
- Dabiri, Emma. Twisted ❉ The Tangled History of Black Hair Culture. Harper Perennial, 2020.
- Donaldson, Star. “The Controversial History of the Hair Typing System.” Byrdie, 25 Oct. 2021.
- Donaldson, Star. “4c Hair Discrimination ❉ An Exploration Of Texturism.” Forbes, 24 July 2022.
- Donaldson, Star. “The History of Hair Typing Systems.” Byrdie, YouTube, 18 Oct. 2021.
- Irizarry, Yasmiyn. The Irizarry Hair Texture Scale. OSF, 2023.
- Johnson, Chelsea Mary Elise. Natural ❉ Black Beauty and the Politics of Hair. New York University Press, 2024.
- “The Science of Curly Hair Typing.” CurlsBot, 8 Mar. 2025.
- Walker, Susannah. Style and Status ❉ Selling Beauty to African American Women, 1920-1975. Ohio University Press, 2007.
- WebMD Editorial Contributors. “Hair Types ❉ Straight, Wavy, Curly, and Coily.” WebMD, 2 May 2025.
- Wilcox, Amanda. “Femininity, Hair Relaxers, and the Impact of Beauty Standards on Black Women’s Health.” The Yale Global Health Review, 27 Oct. 2017.