How does CROWN Act protect textured hair heritage?

Roots

To those who carry the stories of coils, kinks, and waves within their very being, the CROWN Act arrives not merely as a piece of legislation, but as a whispered affirmation from the ancestral plane. It is a declaration, echoing through generations, that the sacred geometry of our hair, born from the deepest roots of our heritage, deserves protection, respect, and celebration. This is not a detached legal text; it is a living document, its clauses intertwined with the vibrant history of textured hair, seeking to mend the tears in a fabric stretched thin by centuries of misunderstanding and prejudice. As we delve into the core of how the CROWN Act safeguards this precious inheritance, we consider the very foundations of textured hair, its biological marvels, and the language that has both defined and, at times, diminished it.

The Textured Hair Codex ❉ Foundations, Anatomy and Nomenclature

The journey to comprehend the CROWN Act’s profound impact begins with an understanding of textured hair itself, a realm where biology, culture, and ancestral wisdom converge. Our strands are not simply protein structures; they are conduits of history, carrying the genetic echoes of countless forebears. The unique helical structure of textured hair, often an elliptical or flattened follicle shape, gives rise to its characteristic curl patterns, from gentle waves to tightly wound coils. This morphology, a gift of genetic inheritance, dictates how natural oils travel down the hair shaft, influencing its inherent need for moisture and its distinct vulnerability to breakage.

Historically, the scientific gaze has not always approached textured hair with reverence or understanding. Early classifications often mirrored societal biases, positioning Eurocentric hair types as the default. Yet, within diasporic communities, a rich lexicon of description and care has always existed, passed down through the generations.

Terms like “kinky,” “coily,” “nappy,” and “locs,” once weaponized by oppressive systems, are now reclaimed, worn as badges of honor, and woven into the very fabric of identity. The CROWN Act, by specifically naming and protecting styles like braids, locs, and twists, directly acknowledges this traditional nomenclature, elevating it from mere descriptive terms to legally recognized expressions of racial identity.

The CROWN Act stands as a legislative guardian, affirming the intrinsic value and protected status of hair textures and styles that echo centuries of Black and mixed-race heritage.

The hair growth cycle, a seemingly universal biological process, takes on a different rhythm and consideration within the context of textured hair care. The anagen (growth), catagen (transitional), and telogen (resting) phases are present in all hair, yet the unique structure of coiled strands can mean different approaches to manipulation and preservation. Ancestral practices, honed over millennia, often instinctively addressed these biological realities. For instance, the use of rich plant butters and oils in ancient African societies was not merely cosmetic; it was a profound understanding of the hair’s need for lubrication and protection against environmental factors, an intuitive science passed through familial lines.

Understanding Follicle Architecture and Its Heritage

The fundamental shape of the hair follicle, nestled beneath the scalp, orchestrates the very pattern of a strand. For those with textured hair, this follicle is typically oval or even flattened, a stark contrast to the round follicles that yield straight hair. This anatomical distinction causes the hair shaft to grow with inherent bends and twists, forming the spirals, coils, and kinks that define its beauty. This biological reality means textured hair possesses points of natural weakness along its bends, making it more prone to breakage if mishandled.

Ancestral communities, long before microscopes or molecular biology, understood these intrinsic qualities through observation and inherited wisdom. Their care practices, often involving gentle manipulation and protective styles, implicitly acknowledged the hair’s delicate nature. This deep, intuitive knowledge, passed through generations, forms a crucial part of our textured hair heritage, informing how we approach its care today. It is a testament to an ancient science, born from lived experience and respect for the body’s natural expressions.

The Lexicon of Coils and Ancestral Names

The language we use to speak of textured hair carries the weight of history. Terms like “afro,” “braids,” “locs,” “twists,” and “Bantu knots” are not mere descriptors; they are signifiers of identity, resilience, and a vibrant cultural heritage. In pre-colonial African societies, specific styles communicated intricate social codes ❉ age, marital status, tribal affiliation, and even spiritual beliefs.

The CROWN Act, by explicitly including these terms in its protective scope, validates this ancestral lexicon, elevating it within legal frameworks. It recognizes that discriminating against these styles is not merely about appearance; it is an assault on cultural expression, a denial of identity, and a dismissal of a deeply rooted heritage. This legal recognition helps dismantle the legacy of “unprofessionalism” often attached to these styles, a legacy that has forced countless individuals to conform to Eurocentric beauty standards at personal and professional cost.

Ritual

As we turn our gaze from the fundamental understanding of textured hair to the living traditions that adorn and sustain it, we step into the realm of ritual. Here, the abstract concepts of hair anatomy and nomenclature find their expression in daily practices, communal gatherings, and artistic endeavors. The CROWN Act, in this light, becomes a shield for these cherished rituals, protecting the spaces where hands meet hair, where stories are exchanged, and where heritage is not just remembered but actively lived. This section explores how the Act intertwines with the art and science of textured hair styling, influencing both ancient techniques and contemporary transformations.

The Art and Science of Textured Hair Styling ❉ Techniques, Tools and Transformations

The history of textured hair styling is a chronicle of artistry, innovation, and survival. From the intricate patterns of cornrows dating back to 3000 BC in the Horn and West Coasts of Africa, serving as maps or markers of identity, to the modern resurgence of natural styles, each choice reflects a connection to heritage. The CROWN Act steps into this historical continuum, recognizing that these styles are not fleeting trends but profound cultural expressions. It offers a legal framework to protect the freedom to wear these styles without fear of professional or educational reprisal.

Protective styles, a cornerstone of textured hair care, have deep ancestral roots. Braids, twists, and locs historically offered practical benefits, minimizing manipulation and protecting delicate strands from environmental stressors, while simultaneously serving as powerful cultural statements. The Act’s explicit mention of these styles acknowledges their dual purpose ❉ both a method of care and a symbol of identity. This legislative backing helps to dismantle the discriminatory perceptions that have long labeled these styles as “unprofessional” or “unruly.”,

The practice of styling textured hair, from ancient braiding to modern protective creations, is a vibrant cultural dialogue, now affirmed by legal protections.

The journey of textured hair through the diaspora reveals a persistent ingenuity in adapting care and styling practices. During the transatlantic slave trade, the forced shaving of hair was a deliberate act of dehumanization, a cruel attempt to strip individuals of their cultural identity. Yet, even in the face of such brutality, braiding persisted as a quiet act of resistance, with enslaved women sometimes braiding escape maps into their hair.

The hot comb, introduced later, offered a means to conform to Eurocentric beauty standards, a complex tool that provided both a pathway to assimilation and, for some, economic independence. The CROWN Act, in its modern context, seeks to undo the lingering effects of these historical pressures, allowing individuals to choose styles that honor their heritage without compromise.

What Ancestral Practices Inform Modern Protective Styling?

The concept of protective styling, so central to contemporary textured hair care, is deeply rooted in ancestral wisdom. Across African societies, styles like cornrows, Bantu knots, and various forms of braids were not only aesthetically pleasing but also served to safeguard the hair from harsh elements and reduce breakage. These techniques were often communal activities, strengthening bonds between family and community members.

For example, the Himba tribe of Namibia uses a mixture of clay and cow fat to create a protective hair paste, shielding strands from the sun and aiding in detangling. This practice, like many others, speaks to an ancient understanding of hair’s needs and the environment’s impact. Modern protective styles, while perhaps employing different tools or products, carry this same intention ❉ to minimize manipulation, retain moisture, and preserve length. The CROWN Act’s protection of these styles therefore extends to a legacy of care and preservation that spans continents and centuries.

How Do Styling Tools Echo Historical Innovations?

The tools used in textured hair care, from ancient combs to modern detangling brushes, carry an echo of historical innovation. Early African communities crafted combs from wood or bone, meticulously designed to navigate the unique structure of coiled hair. These were not just utilitarian objects; they were often adorned, becoming extensions of personal and communal artistry.

Consider the journey from the rudimentary hot combs of the late 19th century, designed to straighten hair for conformity, to the diverse array of heat-free tools available today that celebrate natural texture. While the former represented a response to oppressive beauty standards, the latter reflects a reclamation of ancestral preference for minimal heat and chemical intervention. The CROWN Act supports this evolution, ensuring that individuals are free to choose tools and techniques that align with their hair’s inherent nature and their cultural heritage, rather than being forced into damaging practices for acceptance.

Here is a list of traditional hair care elements:

• Shea Butter ❉ A rich, nourishing fat extracted from the nuts of the African shea tree, historically used for its moisturizing and protective qualities on hair and skin.
• Chebe Powder ❉ Originating from Chad, this blend of herbs, including the Chebe plant, is traditionally applied as a paste to hair to promote length retention and strength.
• Aloe Vera ❉ Used across various ancient cultures, including in Latin America, for its soothing, conditioning, and growth-promoting properties for the scalp and hair.
• Natural Oils ❉ A diverse category including coconut, castor, and olive oils, employed for centuries in African and diasporic communities to seal moisture, add shine, and nourish strands.
• Combs and Picks ❉ Crafted from wood, bone, or horn in ancient times, these tools were designed to navigate and detangle coiled hair, often serving ceremonial or artistic purposes.

Relay

As we traverse the historical and practical landscapes of textured hair, we arrive at the “Relay” — the most profound and interconnected exploration of how the CROWN Act serves as a conduit for heritage, shaping not only individual identity but also the collective narrative of Black and mixed-race communities. This section invites a deeper contemplation, moving beyond surface-level discussions to reveal the intricate interplay of biological, psychological, social, and historical factors that the CROWN Act addresses. It is here that the legislation’s true scope, as a protector of an enduring legacy, comes into its sharpest focus.

The Unbound Helix ❉ Voicing Identity and Shaping Futures

The CROWN Act, standing for “Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair,” is more than a legal decree; it is a profound societal statement that aims to dismantle systemic discrimination against hair textures and styles historically associated with Black and mixed-race communities. Its genesis stems from a long history of prejudice where natural hair, in its myriad forms, has been deemed “unprofessional,” “unruly,” or simply unacceptable in schools and workplaces. This perception has forced countless individuals to alter their hair, often through damaging chemical processes or restrictive styling, to conform to Eurocentric beauty standards.

The legislative journey of the CROWN Act began in California in 2019, passed unanimously in both chambers of the state legislature, and signed into law on July 3, 2019. Since then, its influence has expanded, with at least 24 states and over 40 local areas enacting similar protections. At the federal level, the CROWN Act has been introduced multiple times in the U.S. House of Representatives, passing in 2020 and 2022, but has faced obstacles in the Senate, underscoring the ongoing struggle for nationwide protection.

The CROWN Act is a contemporary testament to the resilience of ancestral practices, providing legal grounding for the right to wear one’s hair in styles rooted in cultural heritage.

The psychological and economic impact of hair discrimination is substantial. Research reveals that Black women’s hair is 2.5 times more likely to be perceived as “unprofessional” than white women’s hair. This bias extends to hiring decisions, with Black women 54% more likely to feel compelled to straighten their hair for a job interview to achieve success. Beyond the workplace, children as young as five years old experience racial discrimination based on their hairstyles, leading to negative impacts on self-esteem and a sense of belonging.

How Does Hair Discrimination Impact Mental Wellbeing?

The constant pressure to conform, to alter one’s natural hair to meet biased standards, inflicts a heavy toll on mental and emotional wellbeing. For individuals within Black and mixed-race communities, hair is deeply intertwined with identity, pride, and cultural continuity. When this expression is policed or deemed unacceptable, it can lead to internalized racism, negative self-image, and chronic stress.

A study found that 53% of Black mothers reported their daughters experienced racial discrimination based on hairstyles as early as five years old, with 66% of Black children in majority-white schools facing such discrimination. These experiences can contribute to anxiety, hypervigilance about how others perceive one’s hair, and a diminished sense of belonging, particularly in environments where Black individuals are underrepresented. The CROWN Act, by providing legal recourse, offers a crucial layer of protection against these psychologically damaging experiences, allowing individuals to express their heritage without fear of punitive measures.

Does the CROWN Act Address All Forms of Hair Discrimination?

While the CROWN Act represents a significant step forward, its scope and application continue to evolve. The legislation primarily prohibits discrimination based on hair texture and protective styles such as braids, locs, twists, and Bantu knots. However, cases like that of Darryl George in Texas highlight a continuing challenge ❉ discrimination based on hair length, particularly for Black men wearing locs, may not always be explicitly covered by existing CROWN Act interpretations.

George, a high school junior, was suspended for the length of his locs, despite Texas having a CROWN Act in place. The judge in his case sided with the school’s argument that if the law intended to protect hair length, it would have specified it. This instance underscores the need for continued advocacy and legislative refinement to ensure comprehensive protection that truly encompasses the full spectrum of textured hair expressions within Black and mixed-race heritage. It points to a broader conversation about what other protections might be missing when the experiences of Black men are not fully considered in anti-discrimination legislation.

The case of Deandre Arnold, a Texas high school student prevented from participating in his graduation ceremony because of his locs, provides a poignant example of the discrimination the CROWN Act seeks to combat. Arnold’s family, with roots in Trinidad, emphasized that his locs were a part of his identity and culture. This instance, prior to Texas’s CROWN Act passage, illustrates the direct conflict between Eurocentric grooming policies and the deep cultural significance of textured hairstyles. The CROWN Act aims to prevent such exclusions, ensuring that individuals are not penalized for embodying their heritage.

The economic ramifications of hair discrimination are also considerable. The need to chemically straighten hair, for example, can be a significant financial burden, with permanent straightening costing hundreds of dollars per session. Beyond direct costs, discrimination limits career advancement and contributes to wage disparities.

Black women, in particular, face a disproportionate impact, with over 44% of Black women workers living in states where they remain vulnerable to hair-based discrimination due to the absence of CROWN Act protections. By mitigating these biases, the CROWN Act seeks to promote economic equity and stability within communities where textured hair is a common, celebrated characteristic.

Reflection

The journey through the CROWN Act’s protective embrace of textured hair heritage reveals a narrative far grander than mere legal statutes. It is a profound meditation on the enduring spirit of a people, etched into every curl, kink, and coil. This legislation, a contemporary response to historical injustices, does not simply grant permission; it echoes a long-held truth that the hair growing from one’s scalp is a sacred extension of identity, a living archive of ancestral wisdom, and a vibrant expression of self.

As the ‘Soul of a Strand’ ethos reminds us, each hair carries the memory of journeys taken, traditions kept, and resilience embodied. The CROWN Act, in its quiet power, helps to ensure that these invaluable stories continue to be told, freely and proudly, by those who carry them, safeguarding a legacy that is both deeply personal and universally resonant.

References

• Omotos, A. (2018). The Significance of Hair in Ancient African Civilizations. Journal of Pan African Studies, 11(7), 132-148.
• Tharps, L. & Byrd, A. (2001). Hair Story ❉ Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America. St. Martin’s Press.
• Byrd, A. & Tharps, L. (2022). Hair Story ❉ Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America. St. Martin’s Press.
• Mensah, C. (2020). Good Hair ❉ The Essential Guide to Afro, Curly and Coily Hair. Quadrille Publishing.
• Warner-Lewis, M. (2003). Central Africa in the Caribbean ❉ Transcending Time, Transforming Cultures. University of West Indies Press.
• Dove and LinkedIn. (2023). 2023 Workplace Research Study. The CROWN Act.
• Dove. (2021). 2021 CROWN Research Study for Girls. The CROWN Act.
• Dove. (2019). 2019 CROWN Research Study for Women. The CROWN Act.
• Stiel, L. et al. (2015). Hair Relaxer Use and Breast Cancer Risk. Carcinogenesis, 36(8), 868-874.
• Chang, C. J. et al. (2022). Hair Product Use and Uterine Leiomyoma in the Sister Study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 130(3), 037001.