How do CROWN Act provisions impact textured hair identity?

Roots

For generations, the strands upon our heads have been more than mere fibers; they have been living archives, repositories of memory, lineage, and spirit. For those of us connected to textured hair heritage, our coils, curls, and locs whisper stories of resilience, of ancestral wisdom, and of identities forged in the crucible of time. Yet, for too long, these deeply personal expressions have been subject to judgment, misunderstanding, and outright discrimination.

The CROWN Act provisions, in their unfolding across various lands, stand as a contemporary echo to a timeless struggle, seeking to mend the dissonance between our natural selves and societal expectations. They ask us to consider ❉ How do CROWN Act provisions impact textured hair identity, particularly when viewed through the profound lens of heritage?

Hair Anatomy and Ancient Perspectives

At its elemental core, textured hair, whether a tight coil or a flowing wave, possesses a unique architecture. The elliptical shape of the hair follicle, a signature of many Black and mixed-race hair types, guides the growth of the strand in a distinct helical pattern. This inherent structure, a biological blueprint passed down through countless generations, defines its spring, its volume, and its tendency to coil.

Ancient societies, particularly those across the African continent, understood this intrinsic nature not as a deviation, but as a gift, a mark of their very being. Their practices, from the earliest recorded adornments to the sophisticated styling techniques, celebrated this biological reality, aligning hair care with natural rhythms and communal values.

For instance, in ancient Egypt, hairstyles were symbols of status and spirituality. Elite individuals, both men and women, often wore elaborate wigs crafted from human hair, wool, and plant fibers, frequently adorned with precious materials, signifying wealth and a link to the divine. The Yoruba people of Nigeria, too, crafted intricate hairstyles, often with deep spiritual significance, performed by skilled braiders. These practices were not about conforming to a singular ideal, but about expressing one’s place within a rich, diverse social and spiritual order.

Classification Systems and Cultural Origins

The modern classification systems for textured hair, while aiming for scientific clarity, sometimes carry the subtle imprint of historical biases. Categories like “Type 4” hair, often associated with tighter coils, have, in the past, been implicitly or explicitly linked to perceptions of “unruliness” or “unprofessionalism” within Eurocentric beauty standards. This historical bias, rooted in the dehumanization of Black people during the transatlantic slave trade, where heads were forcibly shaved to erase cultural identity, has long cast a shadow.

The CROWN Act, by explicitly protecting hair texture and protective styles like braids, locs, and twists, challenges these ingrained biases. It asserts that the natural expression of one’s hair, a direct inheritance from ancestral lines, is not a matter of choice for conformity, but a fundamental aspect of identity that deserves protection. This legislative movement recognizes that hair, for many Black and mixed-race individuals, is not merely aesthetic; it is a declaration of personal identity and a symbol of heritage and ancestry.

The CROWN Act acknowledges the inherent connection between textured hair and ancestral identity, seeking to dismantle discriminatory perceptions.

The essential lexicon of textured hair, therefore, must expand beyond purely descriptive terms to include the cultural weight each style carries. Terms like Cornrows, Locs, and Bantu Knots are not just names for styles; they are echoes of historical practices, acts of resistance, and affirmations of belonging. Cornrows, for example, trace back to 3000 B.C. Africa, where patterns indicated tribal affiliation, social status, and even served as maps for escape during enslavement.

Ritual

Stepping into the realm of ritual, we find ourselves immersed in the practices that have shaped textured hair care for millennia. This is where the wisdom of generations truly comes alive, where hands move with purpose, tending to strands not just as physical entities, but as extensions of self, spirit, and collective memory. The CROWN Act provisions, in their contemporary assertion of dignity and acceptance, acknowledge the long lineage of these rituals, which have too often been misunderstood or devalued in spaces demanding conformity. How do these provisions, then, truly resonate with the ancestral and living practices that form the bedrock of textured hair identity?

Protective Styling Lineage

Protective styles, such as Braids, Twists, and Locs, are more than mere fashion statements; they are deeply rooted in ancestral practices, serving both aesthetic and practical purposes. In pre-colonial African societies, these styles communicated complex social cues, including age, marital status, wealth, and tribal affiliation. The creation of these styles was often a communal activity, fostering bonds and transmitting cultural knowledge across generations.

During the transatlantic slave trade, these practices persisted, often becoming covert acts of resistance. Enslaved Africans used cornrows to carry rice seeds for survival or to map escape routes. This history underscores the profound resilience and adaptability embedded within these styling traditions. The CROWN Act, by explicitly protecting these styles, validates this historical continuity, allowing individuals to wear their heritage openly without fear of professional or educational repercussions.

Natural Styling and Ancestral Methods

The movement towards natural styling today mirrors a return to ancient methods of hair care that celebrated the inherent qualities of textured hair. Our ancestors utilized what the earth provided, crafting nourishing elixirs and treatments from plants and natural butters. These traditions were not about altering the hair’s natural form but about enhancing its vitality and strength.

• Shea Butter ❉ Used for centuries across Africa, this rich butter from the shea tree provides deep moisture and protection, shielding hair from dryness.
• Aloe Vera ❉ A staple in African hair care, it soothes the scalp and provides hydration, promoting shine.
• Marula Oil ❉ Often called “The Tree of Life” oil, it is rich in antioxidants and fatty acids, protecting against breakage and adding softness.
• Chebe Powder ❉ Originating from the Basara Arab women of Chad, this blend of herbs, seeds, and plants coats and protects natural hair, promoting length retention.

These ingredients, passed down through generations, speak to a holistic approach to wellness where hair care is intertwined with connection to the land and ancestral wisdom. The CROWN Act, in protecting the right to wear hair in its natural state, creates a space for these traditional practices to flourish in contemporary settings, bridging the gap between historical reverence and modern-day acceptance.

Ancestral care rituals, once confined to private spaces, now gain public recognition through CROWN Act provisions, honoring their cultural significance.

The Nighttime Sanctuary and Bonnet Wisdom

The seemingly simple act of covering one’s hair at night, often with a bonnet or scarf, also holds a subtle yet significant place in textured hair heritage. This practice, deeply ingrained in many Black communities, serves not only to protect delicate strands from friction and moisture loss but also to honor the hair as a sacred aspect of self. While specific historical documentation on bonnets might be sparse, the tradition of headwraps and hair coverings in African and diasporic cultures is ancient, often signifying status, marital state, or spiritual devotion. The modern bonnet, in a way, is a continuation of this legacy of protecting and revering the hair, even in repose.

The CROWN Act, by addressing discrimination against protective styles, indirectly validates the care practices that sustain these styles. When a workplace or school accepts braids or locs, it implicitly acknowledges the need for practices like nighttime protection that preserve the health and integrity of these styles, thereby affirming a holistic approach to textured hair care that is deeply rooted in heritage.

Relay

As we move into the realm of “Relay,” our inquiry into how CROWN Act provisions impact textured hair identity deepens, shifting from the foundational and ritualistic to the profound interplay of legislation, psychology, and the ongoing cultural narrative. The CROWN Act, a contemporary legal instrument, serves as a crucial relay point, transmitting the enduring values of textured hair heritage into the legal frameworks of the present. How does this legislation, then, truly reshape the landscape of identity for those whose hair carries centuries of stories, struggles, and triumphs?

Legislation as a Cultural Affirmation

The CROWN Act, an acronym for “Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair,” was born from a pressing need to address systemic hair discrimination. While the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provided protections against race-based discrimination, it did not explicitly cover hair texture or protective styles, leaving a loophole that allowed for discrimination against Black and brown individuals in schools and workplaces. This legal gap meant that policies prohibiting natural hairstyles, such as afros, braids, Bantu knots, and locs, were used to justify the removal of Black children from classrooms and adults from their employment.

The CROWN Act directly addresses this historical oversight by expanding the definition of race to include hair texture and styles historically associated with race. As of 2024, the CROWN Act has been enacted in 24 states, with a federal bill passing the House in 2022, though it stalled in the Senate. This legislative movement is a powerful cultural affirmation, declaring that one’s natural hair, an intrinsic part of Black and mixed-race identity, is not a basis for prejudice.

The CROWN Act represents a legal recognition of textured hair as an indelible aspect of racial identity, challenging long-standing biases.

Psychological Resonance of Legal Protection

The psychological impact of hair discrimination has been profound. Black women, in particular, report being frustrated by the effort required to conceal their racialized hair characteristics to conform in professional or academic settings. This pressure to alter natural hair, which for many is a significant part of their identity, can lead to negative psychological consequences, including lowered self-esteem, heightened anxiety, and feelings of inauthenticity. A 2019 study by Dove revealed that Black women are 1.5 times more likely to be sent home from the workplace due to their hair, and 80% reported feeling the need to change their natural hairstyle to fit into office settings.

The CROWN Act provisions offer a vital shield against this psychological burden. By creating legal recourse, they alleviate the pressure to conform to Eurocentric beauty standards, allowing individuals to express their authentic selves without fear of professional or educational detriment. This legal protection fosters a sense of psychological safety, affirming that one’s natural hair is not a barrier to opportunity but a celebrated aspect of identity.

Hair as a Symbol of Resistance and Identity

Throughout history, textured hair has served as a powerful symbol of resistance and identity assertion. In the post-slavery era, when Black people with more Eurocentric features often found greater acceptance in white spaces, there was immense pressure to straighten hair. However, during the Civil Rights era, the afro became a potent symbol of Black empowerment and political consciousness, a declaration of “Black is Beautiful” that challenged mainstream ideals.

Consider the powerful narrative of the Tignon Laws in 18th-century Louisiana. In 1786, these laws mandated that free Black women, known for their elaborate hairstyles, cover their hair with tignons or headwraps to distinguish them from white women and assert a social hierarchy. However, these women ingeniously transformed the tignon into an artistic expression, using vibrant fabrics and ornate tying techniques, effectively subverting the law and turning a symbol of oppression into a statement of cultural pride and creativity.

This historical example illuminates how Black communities have consistently used hair as a canvas for self-expression and resistance, even under duress. The CROWN Act echoes this historical defiance, offering legal protection for contemporary expressions of textured hair identity.

The CROWN Act, therefore, is not merely a legal document; it is a profound recognition of this enduring heritage. It acknowledges that hair discrimination is not simply about appearance; it is about racial discrimination, upholding white supremacy, and policing Black identity. By prohibiting such discrimination, the Act contributes to a broader societal shift towards valuing diversity and respecting the ancestral stories held within every strand of textured hair.

Reflection

The journey through the impact of CROWN Act provisions on textured hair identity reveals a deep and abiding connection to heritage, a story whispered from ancient times to the present day. Each coil, every twist, every loc carries the memory of resilience, the wisdom of ancestral practices, and the undeniable spirit of self-affirmation. The CROWN Act, in its legislative reach, does more than prohibit discrimination; it serves as a contemporary guardian of this living, breathing archive that is textured hair.

It helps to ensure that the “Soul of a Strand” can truly flourish, unbound by narrow perceptions, celebrated for its inherent beauty and its profound lineage. This ongoing conversation, this persistent advocacy for recognition and respect, reminds us that the quest for dignity is intertwined with the freedom to be, authentically and completely, ourselves, with every hair on our heads telling its magnificent, unwritten story.

References

• Afriklens. (2024). African Hairstyles ❉ Cultural Significance and Legacy .
• BLAM UK CIC. (2022). The history of Black Hair .
• Chatelaine. (2023). What My Mother Taught Me About My Hair .
• Dove. (2019). The CROWN Research Study .
• Economic Policy Institute. (2023). The CROWN Act ❉ A jewel for combating racial discrimination in the workplace and classroom .
• Expedition Subsahara. (n.d.). Braids ❉ A Brief Cultural History .
• Genesis Career College. (n.d.). History of Braids ❉ More Than Just a Hairstyle .
• HiPeople. (2024). What is Hair Bias? Definition, Types, Examples .
• Katherine Haircare. (2025). This Homemade Afro Hair Product is 10x Better than Just Shea .
• Legal Defense Fund. (n.d.). The CROWN Act .
• Legal Defense Fund. (n.d.). Hair Discrimination FAQ .
• My Sasun. (2023). Exploring the Rich World of Nigerian Hair and Beauty Products .
• NPR. (2024). Black lawmakers reintroduce federal CROWN Act legislation to ban hair discrimination .
• Odele Beauty. (2024). A History Lesson On Hair Braiding .
• Ottosen DiNolfo Hasenbalg & Castaldo, Ltd. (2022). CROWNing Moment ❉ Implications for Employers as CROWN Act Expands .
• ResearchGate. (2024). Don’t Get It Twisted ❉ Untangling the Psychology of Hair Discrimination Within Black Communities .
• Roosted. (2025). A Heads Up on The CROWN Act ❉ What Employers Need to Know About Hair .
• Sister Sky. (2019). The Significance Of Hair In Native American Culture .
• Substack. (2025). Ancestral Hair Rituals to Nourish Your Hair and Soul .
• TestGorilla. (n.d.). How hair bias affects Black women in the workplace .
• The Curl Boutique. (n.d.). Concerning the History of Hair Discrimination .
• The Kurl Kitchen. (2024). The Cultural Significance Of Natural Hair In Different Communities .
• Wikipedia. (n.d.). African-American hair .
• Wikipedia. (n.d.). CROWN Act of 2022 .
• Wikipedia. (n.d.). Discrimination based on hair texture .
• YorkSpace. (2021). Braided Archives ❉ Black hair as a site of diasporic transindividuation Océane Nyela A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Gradua .