
Roots
Consider a solitary strand. A curl, perhaps, or a coil, a ripple against the scalp. It holds within its very structure echoes of ancestral rhythms, whispers of sun-drenched lands, and the resilience of generations.
How colonial influences shaped textured hair heritage is a question not merely about aesthetics; it is an inquiry into the profound transformations of identity, the forceful imposition of new worldviews, and the enduring spirit of defiance held within each twist and turn of a strand. Our journey into this heritage begins not with a dramatic declaration, but with a quiet observance of the hair itself, a recognition of its intrinsic meaning long before external forces sought to redefine it.

The Hair’s Intrinsic Wisdom
For centuries, across countless communities in Africa, hair was a living symbol, a language written upon the head. It communicated far more than mere beauty; it conveyed age, marital status, social standing, tribal identity, wealth, and even spiritual beliefs. The intricate designs, often woven with care and community, were not random adornments; they were precise declarations of belonging and life journey. The Maasai, for example, wore distinct styles to mark life stages, their hair becoming a re-affirmation of spiritual connection.
Yoruba people in Nigeria crafted styles symbolizing community roles, with hair viewed as sacred, a medium connecting individuals to their ancestors and deities. This deep, multifaceted reverence for hair stood in stark contrast to the burgeoning colonial gaze.
The biological uniqueness of textured hair, with its elliptical follicle shape creating varied curl patterns, from broad waves to tightly packed coils, was a source of aesthetic wonder and practical innovation in pre-colonial societies. Different textures and patterns allowed for a vast lexicon of styles, each with specific cultural resonance. The very act of hairstyling was often a communal activity, a time for sharing stories, wisdom, and strengthening social bonds. This shared experience, often lasting for hours or days, fortified the collective spirit and passed on traditional practices, linking one generation to the next.
Pre-colonial African hairstyles were a profound visual language, communicating identity, status, and spiritual connections across diverse communities.

Anatomy and Identity ❉ Pre-Colonial Understandings
Long before modern science offered its precise anatomical descriptions, African communities possessed an intuitive, experiential understanding of hair’s needs. They recognized the unique characteristics of their hair textures, developing sophisticated care routines and tools. These practices were not divorced from their environment; they were deeply interwoven with the natural bounty of their lands. Consider the indigenous botanicals used for nourishment and protection ❉ shea butter, argan oil, moringa, and baobab oil were not merely ingredients; they were elements of a holistic wellness philosophy, deeply connected to the land and its ancestral wisdom.
The understanding of hair growth cycles, though not articulated in contemporary scientific terms, was embodied in cyclical styling practices. Protective styles that reduced manipulation and retained moisture were commonplace, reflecting a deep respect for hair health and longevity. These protective styles, from various forms of braids to twisted coils, served not only aesthetic and communicative purposes but also preserved the hair’s integrity in diverse climates.
The traditional lexicon of textured hair was one of reverence and practical application, terms descriptive of curl patterns, styling techniques, and the cultural significance of each style, all rooted in an understanding of hair as a living, sacred entity. This communal and spiritual relationship with hair laid a robust foundation, one that would be aggressively challenged by the onset of colonial expansion.
The forced disruption of these practices began almost immediately with the transatlantic slave trade. Enslaved Africans were often subjected to forced head shaving upon arrival in the Americas, a deliberate act of dehumanization and cultural erasure. This violent act stripped individuals of a vital marker of identity, family ties, and spiritual connection, severing a lifeline to their homeland and their people.
The intent was clear ❉ to break the spirit, to sever the individual from their collective heritage, and to reduce them to mere commodities. This profound trauma marked a turning point in the heritage of textured hair, forcing adaptation and clandestine resilience.
| Pre-Colonial Significance Social Status ❉ Indicated rank, wealth, and community roles. |
| Colonial Period Transformation or Attack Forced shaving; reduction to common, "unkempt" appearance. |
| Pre-Colonial Significance Spiritual Connection ❉ Linked individuals to ancestors and deities. |
| Colonial Period Transformation or Attack Missionary schools sometimes required shaving to suppress cultural ties. |
| Pre-Colonial Significance Tribal Identity ❉ Distinct styles marked ethnic affiliation. |
| Colonial Period Transformation or Attack Erasure of identifying styles to homogenize and dehumanize. |
| Pre-Colonial Significance Rite of Passage ❉ Signified life transitions like marriage or adulthood. |
| Colonial Period Transformation or Attack Disruption of communal styling rituals that reinforced these markers. |
| Pre-Colonial Significance Colonial practices systematically undermined the rich, layered meanings embedded in ancestral textured hair heritage. |

Ritual
The ritual of hair care, in pre-colonial societies, was a sacred communion, a deliberate act of reverence for the self and the collective. It was rooted in a profound understanding of the natural world, a careful dance with botanicals and communal wisdom. The imposition of colonial rule, however, sought to sever this connection, to dismantle these deeply held practices, and to replace them with a new order of beauty and acceptability. The story of textured hair through this era is one of a forced adaptation, a quiet resistance, and a relentless pursuit of self-preservation against a tide of imposed standards.

Shifting Landscapes of Care
With forced displacement and enslavement, access to traditional tools and natural ingredients vanished. Enslaved individuals were cut off from the very resources that had sustained their hair for generations—the shea butter, the red ochre, the indigenous oils—and the communal spaces where styling knowledge was shared. This absence created a void, leading to improvised solutions. Reports describe enslaved individuals using unconventional substances such as kerosene, bacon grease, or butter to lubricate their hair, and even combs meant for livestock.
These were not acts of choice, but acts of necessity, a testament to the desperate ingenuity required to maintain a semblance of care under extreme hardship. The very act of attempting to groom hair in these circumstances became a quiet act of dignity, a refusal to completely succumb to dehumanization.
The colonial agenda extended beyond physical deprivation. It actively propagated a new aesthetic, one that deemed textured hair “unkempt,” “unprofessional,” or “dirty,” contrasting it sharply with the idealized straight hair of Europeans. This deliberate disparagement of indigenous features, including hair, served as a tool for dehumanization and to justify enslavement. Such messaging became deeply ingrained, leading to generations internalizing a negative perception of their natural hair.
The hierarchy of hair types, favoring looser curls and straighter textures, became a mechanism of social control, with those exhibiting features closer to the European ideal sometimes receiving preferential treatment, such as being assigned to house work over more arduous field labor. This subtle, yet insidious, form of discrimination, known as texturism, created divisions within communities, perpetuating the colonial beauty standard long after overt slavery had ended.
The disruption of ancestral hair care practices during colonialism forced improvisation, while the imposition of European beauty standards ignited deep-seated self-perception challenges within textured hair communities.

Traditional Styling Under Duress
Despite these immense pressures, the spirit of ancestral styling persisted, transforming into quiet acts of defiance and cultural continuity. Cornrows, for instance, became a powerful example of resistance. These intricate braids, lying flat against the scalp, were not merely a practical way to manage hair; they served as a covert means of communication.
Enslaved Africans braided messages into their hair, patterns that could encode escape routes, maps, or even hide rice seeds for survival. This profound ingenuity transformed hair into a silent, living archive of resistance, a testament to the enduring human need for freedom and connection.
The practice of communal braiding, though often forced into secrecy or limited spaces, also endured. These sessions, even under the watchful eye of oppressors, served as vital moments of social solidarity, allowing community members to share experiences, maintain unity, and transmit cultural knowledge. The very act of caring for one another’s hair became an act of reclaiming humanity, a gentle rebellion against systems designed to strip individuals of their dignity.
Here are some of the ways traditional African hair practices adapted and persisted during colonial periods:
- Ingenuity in Tool Substitution ❉ Without access to traditional combs and styling instruments, communities repurposed available materials, such as metal from discarded items or even animal grooming tools, to tend to their hair.
- Adaptation of Protective Styles ❉ Styles that required minimal maintenance and offered protection from harsh conditions, such as simple braids or wrapped hair, gained prominence, ensuring hair health and manageability amidst forced labor.
- Secret Communication Through Patterns ❉ Specific cornrow patterns were developed to convey coded messages, map escape routes, or conceal valuable items like seeds, demonstrating a powerful form of non-verbal communication.
- Continuance of Communal Grooming ❉ Despite oppressive conditions, the social ritual of hair care, even if limited to brief moments, continued to foster community bonds and the quiet exchange of cultural heritage.
The advent of commercial hair care products in the 19th and 20th centuries, particularly hair straighteners and hot combs, further solidified the colonial beauty standard. These products, initially marketed for “taming” hair, offered a means for Black women to conform to Eurocentric ideals, often as a perceived pathway to social and economic advancement. Figures such as Madam C.J.
Walker built fortunes by creating and distributing these products, highlighting the immense demand for hair alteration within the Black community, a demand shaped by centuries of discrimination and the deeply ingrained notion of “good hair” being synonymous with straighter textures. This created a complex legacy ❉ while it offered economic opportunity for some Black entrepreneurs, it also reinforced a standard that often required chemical or heat alteration, sometimes at the expense of hair health.
| Product Type Traditional Oils/Butters (e.g. Shea Butter, Palm Oil) |
| Origin/Historical Context Indigenous African botanicals, used for centuries for nourishment and protection. |
| Colonial Influence/Impact on Textured Hair Access disrupted by colonialism and displacement; later devalued in favor of Western products. |
| Product Type Hair Straighteners/Relaxers |
| Origin/Historical Context Developed in the late 19th/early 20th century, popularized by figures like Madam C.J. Walker. |
| Colonial Influence/Impact on Textured Hair Perpetuated Eurocentric beauty ideals; offered a means to conform but often caused damage and internalized self-negation. |
| Product Type Hot Combs/Pressing Combs |
| Origin/Historical Context Became popular in the late 1800s. |
| Colonial Influence/Impact on Textured Hair Provided a temporary method to achieve straighter hair, supporting the push for Eurocentric appearance. |
| Product Type The shift from ancestral plant-based care to chemical alteration reflects the profound impact of colonial beauty standards on textured hair practices. |

Relay
The relay of heritage is never a static transmission; it is a dynamic journey, shaped by every hand that touches it. The legacy of colonial influences on textured hair continues to echo through contemporary experiences, manifesting in both overt and subtle forms of discrimination, while simultaneously fueling powerful movements of reclamation and pride. This section will explore the enduring complexities of this history, examining how the past continues to inform the present understanding of textured hair, urging a deeper understanding that moves beyond surface-level aesthetics.

Lingering Shadows and Systems of Control
Despite significant strides, the remnants of colonial attitudes toward textured hair persist in modern society, particularly in institutional and professional settings. The notion that Afro-textured hair, in its natural state, is “unprofessional” or “unacceptable” remains a pervasive issue. This is not merely a matter of personal preference; it is a direct continuation of racial hierarchies established during colonialism, which positioned European features as the epitome of beauty and respectability.
Legal battles over workplace hair discrimination, such as the case of Rogers v. American Airlines in 1981, which initially upheld an employer’s right to prohibit braided hairstyles, highlight the ongoing struggle for recognition and acceptance of natural hair in professional spaces.
A poignant example of this systemic discrimination is the historical “Comb Test” or “Pencil Test” used in some contexts, particularly during apartheid in South Africa. In the “Pencil Test,” individuals were classified racially based on whether a pencil placed in their hair would fall out when they shook their head. If the pencil remained, indicating tightly coiled hair, it often led to classification as “Black” or “Coloured,” which carried severe social and economic disadvantages. This profoundly illustrates how hair texture was weaponized as a phenotypic marker for racial group membership, directly assigning or denying privilege, a practice deeply rooted in colonial racial stratification.
Such mechanisms underscored the belief that proximity to whiteness, including hair texture, granted greater social value. This legacy of discriminatory practices has led to a societal pressure for many Black and mixed-race individuals to alter their hair to conform to Eurocentric standards, a phenomenon that has had significant psychological and economic consequences.
Colonial attitudes continue to influence contemporary perceptions of textured hair, often manifesting as systemic discrimination and a persistent devaluation of natural styles.

Reclaiming the Strand ❉ Resilience and Resistance
Against this backdrop of enduring pressure, movements celebrating natural hair have surged as powerful acts of cultural reclamation and resistance. The “Black is Beautiful” movement of the 1960s and 1970s, concurrent with the Civil Rights Movement, challenged Eurocentric beauty norms, asserting the inherent beauty of Black features, including Afro-textured hair. Figures like Angela Davis, sporting her iconic Afro, transformed natural hair into a symbol of political power, self-love, and solidarity. This era marked a profound shift in self-perception, encouraging a return to styles that were once symbols of African heritage but had been suppressed by colonial imposition.
More recently, the natural hair movement of the 21st century, amplified by social media, has continued this legacy, fostering a global community dedicated to embracing and celebrating natural textures. This movement is not just about aesthetics; it is about self-acceptance, connection to ancestral heritage, and challenging discriminatory practices. Legislation like the CROWN Act in the United States, designed to prohibit discrimination based on race-based hairstyles and hair texture, represents a significant step in dismantling the legal and social structures built upon colonial beauty ideals. Such legal protections acknowledge that hair discrimination is a direct extension of racial discrimination, rooted in historical oppression.
The journey of textured hair through the colonial era and into the present day is a profound narrative of resilience. It is a story of how communities, stripped of so much, clung to the cultural significance of their hair, transforming it from a site of oppression into a symbol of unwavering identity. The act of wearing one’s natural hair, or embracing protective styles, becomes a conscious connection to a heritage that survived centuries of attempts at erasure.
- Symbolic Protest ❉ Growing natural hair during periods of intense discrimination served as an act of defiance, particularly during anti-colonial movements and the Civil Rights era. The Mau Mau Rebellion in Kenya, for example, saw individuals grow their hair as a form of rebellion against colonial authorities, who often associated it with being “dreadful”.
- Community Building ❉ Natural hair gatherings and online communities serve as spaces for shared experiences, knowledge exchange, and mutual support, mirroring the communal styling practices of pre-colonial Africa.
- Economic Empowerment ❉ The rise of Black-owned hair care brands catering to natural textures represents a reclaiming of economic agency within an industry historically dominated by products promoting hair alteration.
- Educational Advocacy ❉ Efforts to educate about the history and science of textured hair challenge ingrained biases and promote a more inclusive understanding of beauty, linking modern understanding to ancestral wisdom.
The scientific understanding of textured hair has also evolved, providing a deeper appreciation for its unique structure and needs. Modern research validates many ancestral care practices, showing how traditional ingredients like shea butter and coconut oil provide genuine benefits for moisture retention and scalp health. This intersection of scientific validation and traditional knowledge strengthens the argument for embracing textured hair in its natural state, further decolonizing beauty standards. The legacy of coloniality is not merely a historical footnote; it is a lived reality for many, yet the strength of heritage, passed down through generations, continues to shape and inspire the path forward for textured hair.
| Colonial Era Discriminatory Practice Forced Head Shaving ❉ Used to dehumanize and erase cultural identity. |
| Post-Colonial / Modern Resistance Natural Hair Movement ❉ Celebration of Afros, locs, and braids as symbols of pride and self-acceptance. |
| Colonial Era Discriminatory Practice "Comb Test" / "Pencil Test" ❉ Used to enforce racial hierarchies based on hair texture. |
| Post-Colonial / Modern Resistance CROWN Act Legislation ❉ Legal protection against hair discrimination in schools and workplaces. |
| Colonial Era Discriminatory Practice Promotion of "Good Hair" (straight/loose curl) ❉ Associated with whiteness and social mobility. |
| Post-Colonial / Modern Resistance Texturism Awareness ❉ Challenging internal biases within the Black community; valuing all curl patterns. |
| Colonial Era Discriminatory Practice The enduring struggle for hair acceptance reveals how colonial standards continue to shape contemporary biases, yet resilience drives ongoing movements for reclamation. |

Reflection
To contemplate the path of textured hair heritage is to witness a profound journey of resilience, a narrative etched deeply into the very helix of each strand. From the communal wisdom of pre-colonial Africa, where hair was a profound language of identity and spirit, to the devastating ruptures of colonial oppression, and then to the vibrant reclamations of today, textured hair has carried the weight of history and the promise of self-determination. It is a living archive, each coil and curl a testament to ancestral practices, enduring struggles, and an unyielding spirit of beauty.
The “Soul of a Strand” ethos calls us to recognize this intricate lineage. It invites us to honor the practices that sustained hair through displacement and forced assimilation, to learn from the ingenuity that transformed a bodily feature into a tool of resistance, and to understand the deep, sometimes painful, psychological shifts wrought by external impositions. Our appreciation for textured hair, today, finds its deepest resonance when connected to this rich, complex past.
It is not merely about styling or care; it is about recognizing the echoes of history in every brushstroke, every twist, every adornment. The ongoing celebration of natural hair represents a powerful reclaiming of ancestral selfhood, a radiant continuation of a heritage that refused to be silenced, choosing instead to bloom in defiant, unbounded forms.

References
- Byrd, A. and Tharps, L. (2001). Hair Story ❉ Untangling the Roots of Black Hair in America. St. Martin’s Press.
- Chavez-Dueñas, N. Y. Adames, H. Y. & Organista, K. C. (2014). Skin Color, Ethnocultural Identity, and Latino/a Identity in the United States. Springer.
- Erasmus, Z. (1997). Looking for Gladde Haren ❉ Passing as Coloured in the 1970s and 1980s South Africa. In Discourses of the Mixed-Race Experience ❉ Negotiating Identity in Historical and Contemporary Contexts.
- Fanon, F. (1967). Black Skin, White Masks. Grove Press.
- Heaton, S. (2021). Hair ❉ Public, Political, Extremely Personal.
- Knowles, S. (2016). Don’t Touch My Hair. On A Seat at the Table. Columbia Records.
- Mercer, K. (1987). Black Hair/Style Politics. New Formations.
- Parris, C. (2015). The Psychology of Black Hair.
- Thompson, R. (2009). Black Women, Beauty, and the Shaping of Black Feminist Thought. University of North Carolina Press.