What is the historical context of discrimination against textured hair?
The historical context of discrimination against textured hair is rooted in systemic bias that devalued ancestral beauty, forcing conformity to Eurocentric ideals.
Meaning ❉ Hair Care Oppression gently points to the subtle yet persistent pressures that have historically hindered individuals with textured hair, especially those of Black and mixed heritage, from fully understanding and nurturing their unique coils and strands. This encompasses a delayed growth in precise knowledge about natural hair’s inherent structure and needs, often rooted in societal beauty norms that once overlooked its specific requirements. It also describes the challenges in developing systematic, almost rhythmically predictable, care routines when information or suitable products have been scarce or misleading, making true hair wellness feel elusive. Furthermore, this term addresses the practical application of hair care, where external expectations or a lack of culturally attuned resources can impede the joyful implementation of practices that truly honor one’s heritage and foster vibrant hair health. Such limitations have historically shaped how individuals approach their hair, influencing product choices, styling options, and even the confidence with which they wear their natural crown.